It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Trueman
Originally posted by wildespace
reply to post by Trueman
Yes, let's dismiss the whole space and science program because you think this particular piece of news is boring.
Brilliant idea. We can survive without high tech stuff like Tang and Velcro...
Originally posted by sylent6
since there is no oxygen on the moon or in space where would the explosion come from?
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by Trueman
Originally posted by wildespace
reply to post by Trueman
Yes, let's dismiss the whole space and science program because you think this particular piece of news is boring.
Brilliant idea. We can survive without high tech stuff like Tang and Velcro...
...and the microprocessor and DRAM memory that are in the computer I'm using...
Oh, wait.
Originally posted by Trueman
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by Trueman
Originally posted by wildespace
reply to post by Trueman
Yes, let's dismiss the whole space and science program because you think this particular piece of news is boring.
Brilliant idea. We can survive without high tech stuff like Tang and Velcro...
...and the microprocessor and DRAM memory that are in the computer I'm using...
Oh, wait.
They told you they invented it, and you believe it. Ever wonder where did they got the idea from ?
Probably one of the better ideas I've seen for a lunar habitation is to construct it inside an old lava tube. They are naturally hollow features which can probably survive some fairly decent impacts without collapsing if the site is chosen well. (Some are millions or billions of years old and if they haven't collapsed by now....there is probably a reason).
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
That's quite a problem to have to overcome, isn't it? I can only think underground is shelter enough?
There is a continuum of particles striking the moon from dust which man-made structures can survive to larger particles. Even the dust would be abrasive and would eventually be like sand-blasting to glass surfaces, I would guess. But in general engineers can calculate what material/thickness can survive what kind of impact. I wouldn't feel very safe in a surface habitation, but the lava tube habitation might be pretty safe. That also addresses the radiation problem in addition to the impact problem.
Does man make any material that would take a full energy strike from even a small meteor fragment?
Source?
Originally posted by SheopleNation
reply to post by Arbitrageur
I still think that we can use Graphene for the smaller meteorites and hope for the best. At the end of the day,The chances of something large hitting one of our man made environments would be like getting struck by lighting here on Earth.
Originally posted by SheopleNation
reply to post by Trueman
It's Alien technology that has been gradually handed down to the sheople by the generosity of the deciders as they see fit. Nothing more, nothing less really. Enjoy your IPhones ect. ~$heopleNation
Originally posted by DocHolidaze
did anyone notice when they were showing all the impacts within the past year or so, there was about a third of the moon that had been un touched, if these thing hit randomly the odds of leaving such a large space untouched is interesting to say the least,
who or what is protecting that part of the moon and why?