It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by benrl
Originally posted by Openeye
reply to post by benrl
hell I'd throw military service as a req as it shows not only a commitment but a willingness to sacrifice for the sake of all of us.
A requirement for military service would not really be logical, there is a a plethora of individuals who either cannot serve or morally object to serving in armed forces.
Same could be said for the bachelor suggestion.
Originally posted by beezzer
How about;
1) Be over 35 years of age.
2) Has held a job for 10 years or more. Has earned a pay check. Has paid taxes. Has supervised people. Has had to fire people. Has had to worry about bills. Has had to budget. Has had to go without in order to pay the utility bills.
Originally posted by benrl
There are other ways to show those, perhaps a simple general testing like the asvab, hell I'd throw military service as a req as it shows not only a commitment but a willingness to sacrifice for the sake of all of us.
Sounds like you're equating military service to some sort of criminal activity.
Originally posted by DiscreteParticle
I really like where this thread is going. I would like to add to this wishlist that extended military actions and big-ticket items need to be approved by referendum of the entire electorate.
The big problem is, how to get the current Congress and President to support it.edit on 14-5-2013 by DiscreteParticle because: (no reason given)