It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source: www.govtrack.us...
(1) GENERAL RULE- An employee may receive, in accordance with this subsection and in lieu of monetary overtime compensation, compensatory time off at a rate not less than one and one-half hours for each hour of employment for which overtime compensation is required by this section.
Restaurants & drinking establishments
Food stores
Electrical contractors
Hotels & motels
Health, Education & Human Resources
Special trade contractors
Builders associations
Retail trade
General business associations
Funeral services
Food & Beverage Products and Services
Commercial printing & typesetting
Chambers of commerce
Wholesale trade
Manufacturing
Small business associations (split)
Democratic/Liberal
Women's issues
Teachers unions
Manufacturing unions
State & local govt employee unions
Abortion policy/Pro-Choice
Food service & related unions
Federal employees unions
Commercial service unions
Minority/Ethnic Groups
Gay & lesbian rights & issues
Elderly issues/Social Security
Labor Unions
Children's rights [About]
Churches, clergy & religious organizations
Welfare & Social Work
Health & welfare policy
Other unions
Human Rights
Consumer groups
Small business associations (split)
H.R. 1406, named the “Working Families Flexibility Act,” would give employers the ability to avoid paying time-and-a-half overtime wages by offering compensatory time off, to be taken at the employer’s discretion. The bill’s proponents say workers get to choose between comp time and overtime pay, hence the “flexibility.” It passed the House on Wednesday 223-204 on a mostly party-line vote, with all six Democratic House members from Washington State voting “no.”
H.R. 1406 does not allow workers to choose when they take comp time. That would be up to management. They say employers could simply refuse to schedule the comp time and pay the wages owed at the end of the year, amounting to employees giving a no-interest loan to their employer. But more importantly, opponents say workers who choose to keep their overtime pay could see their hours cut or be fired and would have no legal recourse
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by DarKPenguiN
Sadly it will play into the hands of temployer no you the worker.
Republicans’ comp-time bill: More work, less pay, This is how is been sold by the proponents
H.R. 1406, named the “Working Families Flexibility Act,” would give employers the ability to avoid paying time-and-a-half overtime wages by offering compensatory time off, to be taken at the employer’s discretion. The bill’s proponents say workers get to choose between comp time and overtime pay, hence the “flexibility.” It passed the House on Wednesday 223-204 on a mostly party-line vote, with all six Democratic House members from Washington State voting “no.”
This is what the bill really do
H.R. 1406 does not allow workers to choose when they take comp time. That would be up to management. They say employers could simply refuse to schedule the comp time and pay the wages owed at the end of the year, amounting to employees giving a no-interest loan to their employer. But more importantly, opponents say workers who choose to keep their overtime pay could see their hours cut or be fired and would have no legal recourse
www.thestand.org...
If you work for a good company that respect you as a worker you are ok, but if you work for an all for profit employer he or she now can short hand you at will.
edit on 13-5-2013 by marg6043 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MilesTeg
reply to post by TheRedneck
Time and a half pay. That's what I'm talking about. No more time and a half pay for working more hours. It completely removes time and a half pay.
Originally posted by DarKPenguiN
I once had a job where we worked 65 hours a week for over a year straight (I left the job so have no idea how long the "mandatory overtime " went on-) 6 days a week for a year can kill you. There was no choice in the matter as it was "mandatory".
My Family life suffered . I had tons of money but was far too tired to spend it. I missed parent/teacher conference and for a year I was just the guy who left in the morning, came home at night and slept.
Originally posted by burdman30ott6
Originally posted by MilesTeg
reply to post by TheRedneck
Time and a half pay. That's what I'm talking about. No more time and a half pay for working more hours. It completely removes time and a half pay.
No it doesn't and you should seriously read the bill before you comment on it because your understanding of it seems to be 180 degrees off of the reality of the bill. It effectively moves workman's comp into a law which all workers will have available to them. Historically, workman's comp has just been a benefit to unionized laborers. It doesn't eliminate time & a half, it enhances time and a half, giving any employee who has worked overtime the option of either taking 1.5X their hourly pay or 1.5 hours of paid time off per hour worked.
You ripped a member above because their work in the performance industry "doesn't represent real world" work... have you ever had a real world job? Usually you earn between 1 and 2 weeks off per year when you first start a job. People have long loved to complain about how little time off they actually get... well, under this law a worker can realistically triple the available time off to them by investing just 3 hours of OT per week. It amuses me because, usually, you hear people bitching about how many hours they're working and how much they could use a break. Well, here's that paid break and still bitching ensues.
Originally posted by burdman30ott6
Originally posted by DarKPenguiN
I once had a job where we worked 65 hours a week for over a year straight (I left the job so have no idea how long the "mandatory overtime " went on-) 6 days a week for a year can kill you. There was no choice in the matter as it was "mandatory".
My Family life suffered . I had tons of money but was far too tired to spend it. I missed parent/teacher conference and for a year I was just the guy who left in the morning, came home at night and slept.
Originally posted by MilesTeg
reply to post by randomtangentsrme
You have to read the fine print. From what I understand of this bill..... it completely abolishes overtime. No matter what..... your paycheck is going to be the same whether you work a 40 hour week or a 60. I want my money this week, not next week. Beyond that..... if you have a death in the family or a sick kid etc. your employer can tell you
NO. You can't leave or you will lose your job. So there will be no attending gramma's funeral or sitting home with little Johnny or Jane when they are sick. They can tell you that you have to stay at work or your fired. How exactly is that a good thing?
(E) WRITTEN REQUEST- An employee may withdraw an agreement described in paragraph (2)(B) at any time. An employee may also request in writing that monetary compensation be provided, at any time, for all compensatory time accrued that has not yet been used. Within 30 days of receiving the written request, the employer shall provide the employee the monetary compensation due in accordance with paragraph (6).
‘(B) who has requested the use of such compensatory time, shall be permitted by the employee’s employer to use such time within a reasonable period after making the request if the use of the compensatory time does not unduly disrupt the operations of the employer.