It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
and apologies if i dampened your morning and again thank you for your reply
Originally posted by Raxoxane
reply to post by Pinke
I feel,as the mother of a young son,that i would rather check a sex-offender list,than run the risk of placing my child in a school where he could fall prey to a cruel person like this.
Are you so lacking in your understanding of basic anatomy to comprehend the implications of a 13 year old raping a 4 year old?
Originally posted by RalagaNarHallas
from what the schools response was...
Detective Chief Inspector Fox, who has alleged a "Catholic mafia" of police and others tried to cover up the clergy's pedophilia in the NSW Hunter Valley, told an inquiry in Newcastle on Tuesday he was ordered off the case at a "hostile" meeting in December 2010.
*That's a great idea too.The point is that this oversized rapist IS OBVIOUSLY A THREAT TO THE SAFETY OF OTHER CHILDREN.Your absolutely right about how schools get their funds as well.That school would fail in a week if parent boycot.
Originally posted by RalagaNarHallas
reply to post by TDawg61
thank you for your reply,and that issue you bring up is why i felt the need to post this as i had no idea this kind of thing was even possible. i dont think they can sue the school as it did not happen during like normal hours(dont think im describing it correctly) but im sure if the parents make a stink and pull the kids out like some other members have stated that it will financially impact the school as they get funding for each kid in a chair so you start taking them out of school you can make an impact.
schools rarely do well with bad press so i feel that is the best avenue for fixing this situation
Silo13, I may hit you up in U2U, because I've been through the 'lets demonize Pinke' journey with you in particular before, and persons will just offensively reframe someone's comments however well they feel like it.
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by Pinke
Me in particular demonize you? I don’t remember ever having a conversation with you before. If I did it was not at all memorable. FYI - I treat you with the same respect as I do any ATS member, no more no less.
I asked you for an explanation for statements you made. I didn’t get the answers. No problem. I feel confident leaving your words to speak for themselves is enough.
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by Pinke
Do you somehow mistakenly believe if it was an 'all game' scenario for the abuser it would somehow magically make the rape less traumatic physically, mentally and emotionally for the 4 year old baby boy? ANd not once but twice?
The sentence served by the abuser was/is inexcusably short. The actions taken by the school board - if at all - equally inexcusable.
Enough said. I’ll not derail this thread over your need for more personalized attention.
Therefore why doesn't the state do the world a favour and terminate his existence before he ruins another childs life.
Originally posted by Gazrok
Therefore why doesn't the state do the world a favour and terminate his existence before he ruins another childs life.
You're advocating the death penalty for minors? Granted, the crime certainly should call for it, but that would be quite a slippery slope, don't you think?