It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jonnywhite
Lets assume that the space command has kept secrets and has created hybrid low-earth-orbit/earth craft that fit the descriptions of many of the flying triangle sightings. The questions is WHY?
Why would they spend the billions of dollars to research and develop these triangles? Why not just develop better ICBM's or stealth-satellites or whatnot? No other nation has admitted to having a fleet of hybrid earth/space vehicles with crews, so there's no reason to be so dominating. And why risk breaking the trust of the public? For example, what if these triangles use something illegal?
Like what if they have nuclear engines or something or use plutonium?
There was an article in my paper recently titled "We need to properly examine the shame of deference." What it was about was hdow the US government can stop investigations by destroying evidence and suppressing evidence and relying on its authority to halt further inquiry.
Without oversight that's in the open we cannot ensure that the public is being served. National security is both necessary and dangerous. There needs to be state secrets, but when is it too much?edit on 6-5-2013 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SloAnPainful
Who is in charge of it then? Since most of the space missions in the U.S are done by the private sector now...
Originally posted by SloAnPainful
reply to post by Aliensun
I wasn't actually asking for someone to explain it and I also wasn't aware this info was there. So thank you.
-SAP-
Originally posted by Bedlam
Behold - Lance Lord, Space Command.
...
I used to crack up every time I ran into this guy, the name just kills me. He's a nice guy, too, but the name is awesome.
Originally posted by guppy
The $2.3 trillion dollars unaccounted for in the US DOD budget