It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shino
What he doesn't make clear, crucially, is whether his fabricated explanations were his own doing or whether he was encouraged to dismiss UFO reports by making absurd claims.
Neither does he state whether or not there was a conspiracy to cover something up. So really we can't come to much of a conclusion with his commentsedit on 1-5-2013 by Shino because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by cconn487
Either we have crazy people running our armed forces.
Or we have liars running our armed forces.
I feel bad for anyone who joins up to serve a country that couldn't care less about the majority of its people. Let alone the population of the planet if it were true.edit on 30-4-2013 by cconn487 because: (no reason given)edit on 30-4-2013 by cconn487 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Arken
Originally posted by Imurxtacy247
Hello All;
Not sure if this is where I am suppose to post. I have never posted anything......I searched and found no mention of the following Apollo 12 Images. Can someone review an tell me what you think these images captured.
Thanks and sorry if im doing this wrong...
AS12-48-7163HR-www.hq.nasa.gov...
AS12-48-7166HR-www.hq.nasa.gov...
AS12-48-7167HR-www.hq.nasa.gov...
AS12-48-7168HR-www.hq.nasa.gov...
PS..I have a bunch of other images that nobody is talking about.....if your interesed...edit on 30-4-2013 by Imurxtacy247 because: (no reason given)
Hi Imurxtacy247.
Very interested!
Please share your images. Thanks.
And welcome on ATS
Originally posted by JayinAR
reply to post by JimOberg
I dont know of any other cases with the swamp gas explanation.
But that doesnt mean other explanations werent equally as abaurd.
The DC flap comes to mind. Official explanation? Temperature inversion and mirage effects. Silliness. These objects had radar return. And one would expect to see this sort of thing often if this were true at all.
It was a sweep under the rug type deal and this is exactly what the OPs witness is describing.
Also, you are putting words in the witnesses mouth a little here. Never did he say swamp gas was used repeatedly. He was saying 'swamp gas...anything really that would satisfy the public's curiosity in the matter'edit on 1-5-2013 by JayinAR because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by JayinAR
reply to post by JimOberg
I would like to see that for myself. The initial number of unknowns in the project is like 1,600 or some odd cases, but I have seen estimates as high as 4,000 in followups by other researchers. I am unaware of Hynek and Hendry ever doing a review. If they did I would like to see it honestly, because what you just said doesnt seem to jive with statements Hynek made years later.
Originally posted by deloprator20000
They also found that the higher quality of the case the MORE likely it was to be classified as unknown. This was about 1952, before the research protocols at Project Blue Book were completely compromised.
The skeptics do have one point, simply because it doesn't appear natural or man made it does not logically follow that it must be ET. Yet, when you start putting all the evidence together, you will see that there are intelligently controlled craft with performance parameters far outside what is achievable with publicly known science and engineering.
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by Arken
Originally posted by Imurxtacy247
Hello All;
Not sure if this is where I am suppose to post. I have never posted anything......I searched and found no mention of the following Apollo 12 Images. Can someone review an tell me what you think these images captured.
Thanks and sorry if im doing this wrong...
AS12-48-7163HR-www.hq.nasa.gov...
AS12-48-7166HR-www.hq.nasa.gov...
AS12-48-7167HR-www.hq.nasa.gov...
AS12-48-7168HR-www.hq.nasa.gov...
PS..I have a bunch of other images that nobody is talking about.....if your interesed...edit on 30-4-2013 by Imurxtacy247 because: (no reason given)
Hi Imurxtacy247.
Very interested!
Please share your images. Thanks.
And welcome on ATS
And what is supposed to be fake about these images? Have you checked the crew EVAs timelines for Apollo-12 over at ALSJ? I still don't understand what you're so excited about.
Originally posted by JayinAR
reply to post by JimOberg
I would like to see that for myself. The initial number of unknowns in the project is like 1,600 or some odd cases, but I have seen estimates as high as 4,000 in followups by other researchers. I am unaware of Hynek and Hendry ever doing a review. If they did I would like to see it honestly, because what you just said doesnt seem to jive with statements Hynek made years later.
"Dr. Hynek had the Center for UFO Studies workers re-examine all of the 13,000
cases collected by the Air Force throughout the summer of 1976. The Center wound
up confirming what the Air Force had alreadyh established: only about 5 per cent of the
cases in Project Blue Book are worthy of being considered genuine UFOs."
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by JayinAR
reply to post by JimOberg
I would like to see that for myself. The initial number of unknowns in the project is like 1,600 or some odd cases, but I have seen estimates as high as 4,000 in followups by other researchers. I am unaware of Hynek and Hendry ever doing a review. If they did I would like to see it honestly, because what you just said doesnt seem to jive with statements Hynek made years later.
Thanks to an associate of mine I offer you this documentation:
Page 245, The UFO Handbook by Allan Handry, Doubleday & Co; 1979
"Dr. Hynek had the Center for UFO Studies workers re-examine all of the 13,000
cases collected by the Air Force throughout the summer of 1976. The Center wound
up confirming what the Air Force had alreadyh established: only about 5 per cent of the
cases in Project Blue Book are worthy of being considered genuine UFOs."
Originally posted by Shino
What he doesn't make clear, crucially, is whether his fabricated explanations were his own doing or whether he was encouraged to dismiss UFO reports by making absurd claims.
Originally posted by Elvis Hendrix
Sounds familiar, EH phage, Jim?
Originally posted by Arken
reply to post by FaceLikeTheSun
There are dozens of new followers right here on ATS......
S&F.