Authorities say landing gear may have been planted: Lowered in on rope!!

ETA: Authorities are the ones investigating this. Lets try to keep this thread relative to that, and please, if you do not agree with someone, that great, lets just keep the rude remarks and namecalling out please?! Now, It is my opinion that NYC officials feel as though their terror tragedy is being overshadowed in wake of the Boston bombings. Now exactly what I thought could be happening as authorities believe that the gear was placed there on purpose. In fact, they believe it to have been lowered in on a rope! They said that the way it was positioned that it would have had to had come in at precisely the right angle! So, what is YOUR opinion ATS?

"The odds of it entering that space at exactly that angle that would permit it to squeeze in there ... it had to come in at almost precisely the right angle," a police spokesman told The New York Times. Investigators are considering the possibility that it was deliberately stuck in the spot, CNN reports. "We are also looking into a possibility it was lowered by a rope," said NYPD commissioner Raymond Kelly, who noted that some rope seemed to be wrapped up in the landing gear.

www.usatoday.com...

The commissioner noted that a piece of rope intertwined with the part looks like a broken pulley that may have come down from the roof of the Islamic community center.

Medical examiner to search for human remains amid landing gear debris near World Trade Center

Lets look at all angles here.

If they planted it then the question is why would they plant that evidence, the internet is full of sites dedicated to 9/11 truth and conspiracies (probably second only to porn ).

For that reason it would be a massive risk for “them” to plant any kind of evidence when the official story has already been established.

I can’t see why “they” would bother planting this landing gear seems totally unnecessary and risky.

Unless someone can explain why they would bother planting and describe how they done this without being exposed then for now I am going to be of the position that no, this was not planted.

Now what has made me come to this conclusion on NYC feeling "left out" is because within a few days of the bombing in Boston, they hold a news conference to announce that the "suspects" were headed to Manhattan to carry out more attacks. When that did not seem to garner more attention than they had planned on, now they come out with this. Is it just a coincidence that earlier this month they started "going through" the rubble from 9/11 as part of their ongoing investigation. All of a sudden, here is a perfectly placed landing gear found 12 years later, that just happens to have "pieces of rope" caught up in it from being lowered into place. All in my opinion, in a cheap way to garner attention and spotlight the the city of New York. Am I the only way that sees this? What are you opinions on this?

reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin


I understand your point, but can you explain how the landing gear could have gotten in that position where it was found. Even investigators are saying it would have had to come in at a right angle, perfectly.

More than WHY did they plant it...

I feel the question should be....WHERE THE HELL DID THEY GET IT FROM.....

Originally posted by thesmokingman
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin

 

I understand your point, but can you explain how the landing gear could have gotten in that position where it was found. Even investigators are saying it would have had to come in at a right angle, perfectly.

I am going to be totally honest and say that no I cant.

But I would say that unless you can explain why they would bother planting the evidence and how they done it and kept it a secret, it doesn’t really matter if I can’t explain how it got there only that it did.

reply to post by andy1972


As GenRadek posted above, as did I in the op, the medical examiner is looking for human remains from the debris of the WTC. They started doing that recently, and they probably got it from the massive debris piles from that day.

reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin


I am just passing on what the authorities working on the case are saying. I am not trying to push my personal agenda here, this thread is stating that this is what the people working on the case are wondering.

They are probably just saying that because it took eleven years for them to find the thing They are embarrassed. It could have been lowered down off a roof to put new roofing on it. Funny that no government helicoptors would have seen it up there

Oh yeah, the PLANE was incinerated on impact...except this.

Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING, to do with 9-11 is an obvious sham. I am just glad they are even considering planted evidence.

reply to post by thesmokingman
The alley's wide enough for the photographer to get in there - '....about 3 feet wide.'

Wouldn't that mean person or persons could have put it there without all the drama of a helicopter or pulley to lower it in?

Let's say some conspirators went to that trouble? Would they leave the rope and undermine the grand scheme? Doubtful...

Maybe someone found it and tried to drag it out of the alley by a rope for scrap value?

I'm not saying the rope isn't peculiar...just that there may be more reasonable explanations than the landing gear was 'planted.'

Obviously, you guys are starting to make me wonder if your just a bunch of grade 8's coming to this site looking for something to talk about...


anyone that believed they actually found the real landing gear was probably busy trying to wash gullible off the roof at the same time

Originally posted by thesmokingman
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin

 

I understand your point, but can you explain how the landing gear could have gotten in that position where it was found. Even investigators are saying it would have had to come in at a right angle, perfectly.

Aircraft wreckage went every which way that morning.

If it was planted why has it only come to light now when allegations of an "inside job" were hotter a few years back ?

How about we see what the National Transportation Safety Board say about it.

reply to post by rickymouse

The twisted metal part, jammed in a sliver of open space between the buildings, has cables and levers on it and is about 3 feet wide and 1.5 feet deep.

This was the size of the piece found. I do not believe there would be a need to have it placed there by helicopter.
blog.al.com...

Originally posted by thesmokingman
reply to post by rickymouse

 

The twisted metal part, jammed in a sliver of open space between the buildings, has cables and levers on it and is about 3 feet wide and 1.5 feet deep.

This was the size of the piece found. I do not believe there would be a need to have it placed there by helicopter.
blog.al.com...

you always seem to be on ATS a conspiracy site disscussing how much you believe the true story, doesn't really make sence i can direct you to some more comfortable websites


the fact is its impossible, they didn't even find parts of the engines which are the heaviest and hardest to destroy parts of the plane, then 13 years later they find untouched landing gear that i guess fell off on the way to hit the building?....

thinking caps boys, and i'm not talking about tinfoil lol

reply to post by Alfie1

Is it just a coincidence that earlier this month they started "going through" the rubble from 9/11 as part of their ongoing investigation. All of a sudden, here is a perfectly placed landing gear found 12 years later, that just happens to have "pieces of rope" caught up in it from being lowered into place.

Again, if one were to read the entire OP, one would clearly see that investigators have been sifting through debris from the WTC.

reply to post by WanderingThe3rd


Grade eights means good quality nuts, not the plain old grade five crap out there. A little lock tight and it stops the loose screws in their tracks.

reply to post by thesmokingman

Haha good find OP.

Well, according to the establishment gatekeepers on ATS, Raymond Kelly should now be considered a "conspiratorial nutjob", like the rest of us who viewed this finding with skepticism.

reply to post by Kandinsky


You know, its funny, the title of this thread is "Authorities say landing gear may have been planted: Lowered in on rope!!"
I am curious why people in this thread are acting as if I had said this was or was not the case. Now, I do have an opinion on WHY it could have been planted there. Other than that, I do believe it says AUTHORITIES are questioning and investigating this, not ATS member thesmokingman.