It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Solway Firth Spaceman (also known as the Solway Spaceman and the Cumberland Spaceman) is a mysterious figure seen in a photograph taken by Jim Templeton in 1964 at Burgh Marsh, situated near Burgh by Sands and overlooking the Solway Firth in Cumbria, England. Templeton claims the photograph shows a background figure wearing a space suit and has insisted that he did not see anyone present when the photograph was taken. Templeton said the only other people on the marshes that day were a couple of old ladies sitting in a car at the far end of the marsh.
In a letter to the Daily Mail in 2002, Templeton stated, "I took three pictures of my daughter Elizabeth in a similar pose – and was shocked when the middle picture came back from Kodak displaying what looks like a spaceman in the background."[2][not in citation given] Templeton insists that he did not see the figure until after his photographs were developed, and analysts at Kodak confirmed that the photograph was genuine.[1]
Templeton claims to have been visited after the photograph was published by two men from "Her Majesty's Government" who refused to show their identification. Templeton claims that when he refused to admit the photo was of a passer-by, the men became angry and drove away leaving him to walk home
Responding to a request from ufologists to know if the photo was of interest to the authorities, a British Ministry of Defence official said that the Templeton photo was of no interest to them.
In a BBC Look North interview and a letter to The Daily Mail, Templeton also claimed that a Blue Streak missile launch at the Woomera Test Range had been aborted because the figures of two large men were seen on the firing range. Templeton alleged that technicians later saw his photograph in an Australian newspaper and found the figures to be "exactly the same type of man, same dress, same figure, same size.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
There's already numerous threads on this, but the most plausible explanation is the "spaceman" is the girl's mother in the background. See this post for more information.
edit on 25-4-2013 by _BoneZ_ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
There's already numerous threads on this, but the most plausible explanation is the "spaceman" is the girl's mother in the background. See this post for more information.
edit on 25-4-2013 by _BoneZ_ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Zcustosmorum
I'm not saying I know what it is, or even if it's a "spaceman", but I know what it isn't and it certainly isn't the mother. I would have to say that debunking effort is clutching at straws at best.
And, why would the family decide to make public the rest of the photos if that were the case? Makes absolutely no sense at all.
And that is the best and most likely explanation. Overexposure and wife standing behind little girl facing away from the camera. If you look at the other existing photo, you see the wife with the same light blue dress and the overexposure causing her to look way too white.
Mystery solved and case closed.
Not all the photos were made public. A few were....not all. And yes, if you look closely, you can tell its a person facing away from the camera with their arm bent (Elbow back). The sun in her shiny brown hair and the overexposure creates the illusion of a "helmet" and as seen in the other photo where the wife is leaning, the overexposure is quite evident.
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
reply to post by WilliamOckham
Not all the photos were made public. A few were....not all. And yes, if you look closely, you can tell its a person facing away from the camera with their arm bent (Elbow back). The sun in her shiny brown hair and the overexposure creates the illusion of a "helmet" and as seen in the other photo where the wife is leaning, the overexposure is quite evident.
nah i dont see, it. I have seen plenty of overposed photos in my time, and just amy not convinced. Sorry.
as pointed this was posted some months ago in a great thread, and is pretty clearly the guy's wife once we all calm down and look at the various pics closely. big storm in a tea cup and a testament to the power of suggestion.
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
reply to post by skalla
as pointed this was posted some months ago in a great thread, and is pretty clearly the guy's wife once we all calm down and look at the various pics closely. big storm in a tea cup and a testament to the power of suggestion.
Its not clearly the mans wife., go fool a child with that argument.