posted on Apr, 24 2013 @ 05:57 AM
Six attacks?
Paulty.
The question to ask, is why haven't six or even 1000's of simultaneous, relatively small bombings already happened?
If i were a would be chief bomber, and relax - i'm not, but hypothetically if i were, this would be a tactic i would most definitely persue.
Small untraceable devices in their 100's, packed with shrapnel and low grade radioactive material (easily obtainable, even online) and placed around
the entire country, set to go off sequencially within minutes of each other would cause absolute terror.
Of course, this isn't something any reasonably minded person would want to see happen, let alone decide to carry out, but why hasn't someone or one
of the many hordes and groups perportedly in the 'business' of Terror or to call them by their official title - Terrorists...already done so?
Nothing would be easier to do. Not much would come close to the levels of fear generated in the public of a radiological bomb, which even relatively
harmless levels of radioactive material would be seen and reported as, since it would contain radioactive material (terror - remember, is designed to
cause maximum terror leading to alteration of the way of life of your target).
The fact that the radioactive material would be pretty much harmless would be irrelavent..it would be a 'dirty radioactive bomb' in the peoples
minds, and that would be enough to cause maximum fear. Multiplied by 100's of devices going off one by one around the country.
After the first 10 or so, there would be mind blowing panic, across the entire country.
Again...why hasn't this already happened?
Security obviously isn't on top of the situation, if we're to believe the Boston bombings are legit...so, are we to assume the gangs of Terrorists
we are being told are focused and solely intent on murdering all of us in our beds, are relentlessly plotting to cause maximum disruption to our way
of life 24 hours a day, 7 days a week...simply what...unimaginative?
Not clever enough to think big? 9/11 was pretty big and imaginative...so it can't be that reason.
Could it be, possibly that the 'Terrorism threat' is actually more just an imagined threat, repeatedly ramped up by the MSM and Government, than it
is actually a real threat?
The absence of the 6 bombs or even 1000's of bombs scenario you put forward seems to prove it is so.
IMO, we are all being had BIG time and have been for well over a decade.