It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
just out right shot dead
Originally posted by missvicky
Originally posted by DarKPenguiN
Originally posted by ikonoklast
So if the US invades countries that have and might use weapons of mass destruction, this means the US can now invade any country with a weapon as powerful or more powerful than a homemade bomb made out of a pressure cooker?
Yes. And thank God for this- its about time.
I know for certain that our neighbors to the North (Canada)while pretending to be nice, civil , peaceful people- Really have WMDs all over the place. A virtual Axis of Evil those canadians are.
I have been promoting a War with the canadians for 27 years now- This could finally be the spark which will allow us to Liberate the canadians and give them freedom.
-Its for the children.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! "- its for the children" ROFLMAO! "
Originally posted by DarKPenguiN
the 711 wasnt them. Its been redacted.
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by oldmeatwad
By the definitions I have seen used on this thread, many people in the states own a WMD of some sort, and I dont see them being dragged from thier homes in manacles, riddled with holes and in such a state of collapse that speech is impossible for the next forty eight hours.
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by oldmeatwad
Honestly though, this madness has to stop. Lets be realistic shall we? A weapon of mass destruction ought to be one that causes such utterly cataclysmic damage, that a bare minimum of a thousand people die per deployment, a weapon so powerful that it can fracture the crust of the planet, or irradiate hundreds of square miles in a single fell swoop. It is inappropriate and dishonest to lump in mortars, grenades, silenced weapons, and IED devices in with that top ten of chaos.