It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Boston Bombings took place to test martial law

page: 6
13
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 12:20 PM
link   
reply to post by Covertblack
 
That makes absolutely no sense...what you are essentially saying is that there will in no point in the future where the government denies it citizens their freedom. Ironically it's already happening and have been for quite some time how is that not obvious? It might not be the north korea type of obvious, but every restriction applied to those who have committed no sins is quite literally a deprivation of freedom?



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 12:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Konoyaro
reply to post by Covertblack
 
That makes absolutely no sense...what you are essentially saying is that there will in no point in the future where the government denies it citizens their freedom. Ironically it's already happening and have been for quite some time how is that not obvious? It might not be the north korea type of obvious, but every restriction applied to those who have committed no sins is quite literally a deprivation of freedom?



Well if you think that doesn't make sense, see my previous question.



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 12:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by extraterrestrialentity
reply to post by Covertblack
 


Nah, I'm pretty sure it's going to happen. They just got to move slowly. Too many still have weapons, and not enough laws are passed yet, for complete martial law to take over.


Alright, but who is "they"? The president changes every 4/8 years. Congress also has term limits. So who is this evil government individual that is trying to make us slaves? It obviously isn't the same people from 20 years ago, so now it's just the current individuals trying to do so?



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 12:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Covertblack
 


The people who rule behind the government. Bankers, corporations, etc.



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 12:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by extraterrestrialentity
reply to post by Covertblack
 


The people who rule behind the government. Bankers, corporations, etc.


Alright, so what is their end game?



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 12:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Covertblack
 


Well, in my opinion, total control. Pretty much like Nazi Germany.



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 12:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Covertblack
 


I have to say I am really enjoying this you are getting into the very difficult questions that the more extreme elements of the conspiracy movement struggle with, motivation!

“Why would a bunch of capitalist bankers want to turn American into a communist utopia Mr. Conspiracy theorist?”

“errrr…”



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 12:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Covertblack

Originally posted by extraterrestrialentity
reply to post by Covertblack
 


Too early to start kicking down doors and saying you're all terrorists to innocent people. They have to go slowly.

It may be legal now, but soon more and more of your liberties will be taken away. You don't have to look at Boston to see that, just look at all of America, and you'll see.


I respect your opinion. My question to you would be why now? Why wait until 2013 to do this? Surely there have been better times for the government to enact a total take over. Before the internet I feel like it would have been fairly easy.

Could be "the internet" is what made them raise their sinister plan.



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 12:50 PM
link   
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
 


Why would a person in Germany want complete control over people as well as kill them just because he doesn't like them? Learn to think a little.



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 12:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by extraterrestrialentity
reply to post by Covertblack
 


Well, in my opinion, total control. Pretty much like Nazi Germany.


So is this to commit genocide, war, money?
edit on 23-4-2013 by Covertblack because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 12:52 PM
link   
reply to post by extraterrestrialentity
 





Why would a person in Germany want complete control over people as well as kill them just because he doesn't like them?


Unless you’re trying to claim that the Nazi’s are trying to take over the world (again) I don’t think your post really has much merit and if this thread has demonstrated anything so far it’s that you might need to work on some of your thought processes not me.



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 12:53 PM
link   
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
 


What about the navy seals?



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 12:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by AhuraMazdah
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
 


What about the navy seals?


what about them?



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 12:58 PM
link   
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
 


Your attempts to derail these kind of threads show me what kind of a person you truly are.

I'm sure you did not understand what I wrote. If a person many, many years ago was willing to brainwash and kill people just because of a hatred towards jewish people, why is it so hard to understand that there are people like that today? That not only hate jewish people, but hate anyone who they believe is inferior.

There is a perfectly valid reason as to why the elite would want complete control.

I will no longer reply to you, as I do not feed trolls.
edit on 23-4-2013 by extraterrestrialentity because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 01:10 PM
link   
reply to post by extraterrestrialentity
 


you're right, you can't get everything from the internet. unlike yourself, I draw most of my conclusions from life experiences and education. i don't sit in the dark recesses of my mind and continuously come up with more outlandish scenarios in an effort to defend my point of view.

i'm still looking for an explanation that requires the armed response of 70,000 personnel, but is an isolated event. the number you're throwing around is almost half of what we had deployed to Iraq during the surge in 2007. it's also close to half of what we had deployed to Afghanistan at the highest point of troop level. so you're telling me that there would be an event requiring almost half the number of people the government deployed to a combat theater, entire countries mind you, but that it would be an isolated event and allow the massive drawn down of manpower in neighboring areas? pure fantasy my friend.



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 01:16 PM
link   
reply to post by Shamrock6
 


You're actually comparing Afghanistan to a terror attack against major US cities with thousands of members? Doesn't sound like you've had much life experience.



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 01:18 PM
link   
reply to post by extraterrestrialentity
 





I will no longer reply to you, as I do not feed trolls.


Yes you do not feed trolls and you have just realised that I have bested you in this debate because no, the events in Boston were not a elaborate guise to test martial law.

As such it is much easier to ignore me.



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 01:22 PM
link   
Yup a test.

Think about it. They mobilized about 10,000+ "troops" (SWAT, police etc) of various kinds in the matter of a few hours.

They took over the streets with their armored vehicles, assault rifles and black outfits. And the sheep chanted USA, USA...

Mission accomplished. Martial law and the sheep loved it.



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 01:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by davjan4
Yup a test.

Think about it. They mobilized about 10,000+ "troops" (SWAT, police etc) of various kinds in the matter of a few hours.

They took over the streets with their armored vehicles, assault rifles and black outfits. And the sheep chanted USA, USA...

Mission accomplished. Martial law and the sheep loved it.


You do realize that when people are being blown up, they usually want help?



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 01:26 PM
link   
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
 


You bested me in nothing. You derailed my thread over a term, just so no one else will agree with me. You clearly do not understand how evil people can be, and so you will find any "logical" explanation just so you can still hold your beliefs without questioning them.

And do not forget that this is a conspiracy site, so don't go around attempting to convert conspiracy theorists into sheep.

And once again you will reply about how I am defeated, and you will find a term that I said wrong, and will once again attempt to derail my thread.







 
13
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join