It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by sulaw
I'm taking that bastard and his company out and saving the indians!
Originally posted by hisshadow
well considering the key to bending spacetime is gravity... and to do that really good you need something the size of a star... or the energy equilivent of a star (e=mc2) ...
now that you can warp spacetime, the problem is howto contain that mass or power in a ship.
which i'll probably stop there, you'd more than likely need the mass of a black hole....
barring shortcuts and physics cheats
Originally posted by Kashai
Originally posted by hisshadow
well considering the key to bending spacetime is gravity... and to do that really good you need something the size of a star... or the energy equilivent of a star (e=mc2) ...
now that you can warp spacetime, the problem is howto contain that mass or power in a ship.
which i'll probably stop there, you'd more than likely need the mass of a black hole....
barring shortcuts and physics cheats
E=mc2 depends upon mass so if you have a object made of Plutonium about 10X10 inches you get a response under the correct circumstances, that the result of a fission reaction.
Electron are known in theory to travel backwards in time they do not need the power of a star or for that matter that of a black hole to do so.
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by 19KTankCommander
I know this something probably we have all thought of at one point and time in our lives.
I have been doing some reading and watched a few shows like accient alliens, which got me thinking, in the past we as a human race have document mentions of time travelers, for example the latest one is the Charlie Chaplin time traveler talking on the cell phone, but it don't stop there, in the bible you have the Profit Ezekiel talking about his sight which can be inturpitiud as seeing a chanook Helocopter. Or the Myans with the doorway carvered into the face of a mountain which is to be a time portal.
Also we have heard that space travel is a form of time travel or they fold or bend space, use worm holes ect.
I guess we can all find a story related to time travel which I would like to read and hear from you all. So with a two part question next have fun.
1. What other time travelers do we know about.
2. If you could go back in time were would you go and when, you can only take two things with you and what would they be.
Have fun looking foward to what you all have to say on this topic.
Originally posted by 19KTankCommander
1. What other time travelers do we know about.
Originally posted by geo1066
Originally posted by ChuckNasty
Not possible. You can slow down current time, but you cannot go back further than now.
I have always heard this but haven't ever seen a link as to why this is so. I would think the opposite would be true
My feeble understanding is that a place in time, and time being a relative term, is nothing but an image of light. If you were accelerating fast enough, yes, you would be observing that one image of light for a longer amount of time- cyclical time that is. Now if you could accelerate to the same speed as that one image of light, you would in essence, stopping time. This is where I 'no comprende'. If you where able to surpass that image, wouldn't you be seeing the previous image of light hence being able to see in the past?
As for the future, that image of light hasn't been conceived yet, so how would you be able to travel into a future? I understand that there's different concepts of time, cyclical, dimensional and physical and without getting to in depth and giving myself a headache, my above understanding takes in effect all three of these concepts.
Thanks in advance for any 'simple understanding' that you may be able to give me - geo
Originally posted by geo1066
reply to post by LocalGenius
See, this is what I don't get so please bear with me -
Now traveling at the speed of light would be that you are basically "freeze framing" that sole image of light patterns which were produced at a specific point in time, which would be considered in 'cyclical time'. Just for definitional purposes 'cyclical time' is a manmade term representing our second by second, minute by minute, hour by hour, day by day, etc., concept of the speed of light...
( Here comes my headache! )
...Now presently you have, what could be considered, stopped time. So, if we could 'put the pedal to the metal' so to speak and surpass that pattern of light, wouldn't it stand to reason that the very next pattern of light would be the pattern preceding?
While you're cruising along catching up with each previous pattern of light, you would be seeing the past related to the given point of where you started.
( This is where my thought patterns really get jumbled..)
All the while this is going on, you would be in your own little bubble of cyclical time because you are still producing patterns of light which are now taking off into the neither. This, I would think, would be a separate time line or dimension of time.
Physically you couldn't do this because of our 'properties of physical laws' in relationship to gravity, i.e.- we'd get ripped apart, but .....................(blank)...................