Nixon's Apollo: Howard Hughes and the Apollo Hoax

Dick gave himself away with that remark about Apollo 8 when he said,

"It was too good to be planned."

Of course it was planned. I suspect that Nixon may be alluding to the fact that he helped plan it along with HRH from before the 1960 election, most likely around that "hot-spot" of history between Sputnik and the 1960 U.S. (s)election.

Nobody had the technology at the time to fake something like this

Obviously you haven't seen 2001.

Whenever I see those moon shots it looks just like the painted background technique Kubrick used in 2001- very fake looking.

Elvis Presley, seen here planning a series of benefit concerts on the moon, and Ron Ziegler, Richard Nixon's press secretary.

a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

SJ just gave himself away with another blunder

read the freaking date of that byline

29th DECEMBER 1968

nixon is not yet president - yup he won the election but his inauration will not occur untill :

20th JANURARY 1969

explain HOW nixon had any role in the apollo program at this time

a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

logic has letf the thread

a reply to: CB328

the sets of 2001 are obviously sets and backrops - but the footage from the apollo program is utterly diferent - and undeniably genuine

a reply to: SayonaraJupiter
If you believed.

a reply to: ignorant_ape

Read the OP:

The Skunk Works Forum Rules - SkepticOverlord

"As mentioned, this forum is for your most outlandish and extreme speculative conspiracy theory ideas. The intent is for like-minded members to engage in collaborative discussions about these theories in an environment that embraces and encourages extreme thought."

Immediately upon on winning the election Nixon begins the process of taking over the administration. He does not sit on his ass for over two months doing nothing, playing golf or bowling. No president-elect has ever just sat on their ass until the inauguration day... I think, ignorant_ape that you don't understand the transition of power in American politics. And Please keep your Defender attitude out of this Skunk Works thread. Thanks in advance.

a reply to: galadofwarthethird

....there is nothing to see....

a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

again - explain NOW nixon alledgedly influenced the apollo program prior to :

2oth JANURARY 1969

skunkworks does not give you some immunity to criticism

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter
skunkworks does not give you some immunity to criticism

Here I'll make it bigger for you

The Skunk Works Forum Rules - SkepticOverlord

"As mentioned, this forum is for your most outlandish and extreme speculative conspiracy theory ideas. The intent is for like-minded members to engage in collaborative discussions about these theories in an environment that embraces and encourages extreme thought."

originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter

OMG!!! That looks exactly like the Apollo photographs, right down to rhe craggy mountains and bullet shaped rocketship! You've convinced me at last! [/sarcasm]

a reply to: CB328

Obviously you haven't seen 2001.

Whenever I see those moon shots it looks just like the painted background technique Kubrick used in 2001- very fake looking.

Actually, you seem to be the one who has never seen 2001. If you did, you would know Kubrick did not use painted backgrounds. Al;so, you would know that for scene involving spacecraft, he used photographs of actual star fields. The technology of the time was so primitive that he could not have the stars eclipsed by the sharp edge of the photographed models. Look closely: the stars fade out as the approach the limb of the spacecraft. For the same reason, spacecraft are never seen transiting the surface of a planet. We see the space station and the shuttle against the black of space, not the blue and white of the Earth because the black fade line would be too noticeable. Here:



And here:



Compare this to typical Apollo photography:



They did not have the technology to fake that sort of image in 1968.

a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

here - i will make it simple for you :

answer the bloody question :

HOW did nixon influence the apollo program prior to 1969 ??????

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter

here - i will make it simple for you :

answer the bloody question :

HOW did nixon influence the apollo program prior to 1969 ??????

Don't you know about the secret CIA time machine that Nixon stole? This is the Skunk Works after all.

a reply to: ignorant_ape
again - explain NOW nixon alledgedly influenced the apollo program prior to : 2oth JANURARY 1969

there is an overwhelming consensus that Nixon was behind the vested hidden agenda

a reply to: Misinformation

you obviously didnt learn from the last episode :

posting irrelevant crap that actully talks about something totally different doesnt work

your " source " which - has been edited to eliminate context ACTUALLY discuses the condut of miliary operations in south east asia - DURING the time of nixons presidency

here is a quote :

Ellsberg disclosed for the first time the contents of a report he prepared in December, 1968, for President-elect Nixon. Ellsberg was working at the time as an analyist for the Rand Corporation, and he said the report listed seven options the President could pursue in his Indochina policy. The options ranged from military escalation and resumption of the bombing of North Vietnam to unilateral U.S. withdrawal. Ellsberg contended that during the first 10 weeks of the new administration Nixon escalated the war through bombing in Cambodia and sending Navy frogmen into Haiphong harbor in North Vietnam. Nixon intended to demonstrate "that he was not going to be constrained by the ground rules of the previous administration's war policies," Ellsberg said.

and now the all impoertant bit you" forgot "

source


so nothing to do with apollo - or how nixon could have influenced the program before his presidency

your dishonesty is gold star material - but your actual " arguments " are " nil points "

if you wish to try ahain - use citations and stick to the topic

a reply to: ignorant_ape
Stanley Kubrick’s 1964 classic, Dr. Strangelove




Nixon rides the bomb


Nixons Treason

a reply to: Misinformation

so you have nothing relevant to add - would it be so painfull for you just to admit it ???

ETA :

just for curiosity - where did you get the image of the newspaper clip - and more important - who edited out all the context ???

i only ask as an insight into the intergrity of hoax believers