It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by buckrogerstime
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
If two kids can cause so much mayhem then I can't fathom how much mayhem an organised state-backed terrorist plot would cause. Sure a few people died and many were injured, but who did it and why? Why would chechans attack america when we have never bothered them before?
Not to mention the media retracted on the whole shoot-out between the culprits and the police, when it was later determined that the dead MIT cop was gunned down by two irrellevant 7-11 gangbangers who sticked up the joint. Two black males and one was wearing a cowboy hat.
It seems to me they used the two gangbangers who stuck-up the 7-11 TO FILL IN the for the boston marathon culprits who were most likely blackwater/craft professionals.
The story we have been getting thus far has more holes than swiss cheese. They probably wanted people to remain inside so that they would not have many eyewitness accounts of the cops chasing the two black suspects.
TWO GANGBANGERS CONFUSED WITH THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBERS. Pathetic!!edit on 20/4/13 by EarthCitizen07 because: (no reason given)
So you think two black robbers were patsies for two Chechen immigrants, who were patsies for Blackwater mercenaries? Yeah, that seems "most likely."
Guess we'll all get our turn to be patsies in this incident!edit on 20-4-2013 by buckrogerstime because: (no reason given)
The chechen immigrants had nothing to do with the boston bombings. They were never chased I think. Why did the media say that the two black men robbed the 7-11, shoot the MIT police officer, stole a car and ran off?
I don't know it is tooooo confusing.
Originally posted by buckrogerstime
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Wasn't the MIT officer at the 7-11 OR was he somewhere else
If he was at the 7-11 then how is it possilbe the chechens shot him, rather than the black dudes who were robbing? The chechens were watching the robbery?
Who stole the car with the hostage inside? Who robbed the gasoline station afterwards?
Some of this information still hasn't come out, but my current understanding is that the MIT officer was shot down near the campus, not at the Central Square 7-11. (That seems to have been an unrelated robbery in another neighborhood).
After shooting the officer, the brothers stole the car and let the driver out at the Shell gas station.edit on 20-4-2013 by buckrogerstime because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by buckrogerstime
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Wasn't the MIT officer at the 7-11 OR was he somewhere else
If he was at the 7-11 then how is it possilbe the chechens shot him, rather than the black dudes who were robbing? The chechens were watching the robbery?
Who stole the car with the hostage inside? Who robbed the gasoline station afterwards?
Some of this information still hasn't come out, but my current understanding is that the MIT officer was shot down near the campus, not at the Central Square 7-11. (That seems to have been an unrelated robbery in another neighborhood).
After shooting the officer, the brothers stole the car and let the driver out at the Shell gas station.edit on 20-4-2013 by buckrogerstime because: (no reason given)
Ok. That makes more sense. Thanks for clarifying. I still don't buy the original story because I can't see why a chechen would have an axe to grind against america, and because of the events of 9-11-2001. Somehow the big picture tells me there is something wrong with everything.
I am about 50-50 on boston.
Originally posted by Glowd33
reply to post by MusicMaker
I agree with you here. I have been looking for inconsistencies from the start, and nothing has yet to really jump out at me. Sure there are a few discrepancies but that information is from the MSM which is always the case with them.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by stussy123
The federal government has earned my distrust for reasons I should not be bothered to list. However since the boston bombings were rather of minor significance but exaggerated by the media and because we are dealing with local government(state and city officials) I am willing to think "outside job" possible.
9-11-2001 was false flag(inside job 100%). Even the general of all american intelligence admitted it. Bush and Cheney said missle instead of plane about pentagon. Locals in nyc said cargo plane with no windows. The videos exist on youtube.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by buckrogerstime
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Wasn't the MIT officer at the 7-11 OR was he somewhere else
If he was at the 7-11 then how is it possilbe the chechens shot him, rather than the black dudes who were robbing? The chechens were watching the robbery?
Who stole the car with the hostage inside? Who robbed the gasoline station afterwards?
Some of this information still hasn't come out, but my current understanding is that the MIT officer was shot down near the campus, not at the Central Square 7-11. (That seems to have been an unrelated robbery in another neighborhood).
After shooting the officer, the brothers stole the car and let the driver out at the Shell gas station.edit on 20-4-2013 by buckrogerstime because: (no reason given)
Ok. That makes more sense. Thanks for clarifying. I still don't buy the original story because I can't see why a chechen would have an axe to grind against america, and because of the events of 9-11-2001. Somehow the big picture tells me there is something wrong with everything.
I am about 50-50 on boston.
The only thing I see wrong with that thought process is the people whom were killed, died by the bombs. The cop was shot, yes and although its unfortunate, cops die every week from related crimes. The manhunt, big on scale and publicity because it dealt with the bombers, has happened before on smaller scales. Unlike Sandy hook, and Arora I don't think there is enough juice to back a gun control measure on this. If the guns the suspects had were illegally obtained, that argument will go out of the window. Not via government, but the people who support our 2nd amendment rights. That and bombs are already illegal so..
Originally posted by stussy123
Originally posted by Glowd33
reply to post by MusicMaker
I agree with you here. I have been looking for inconsistencies from the start, and nothing has yet to really jump out at me. Sure there are a few discrepancies but that information is from the MSM which is always the case with them.
We'll see how this pans out in the near future. I think this event has the capability to alter a lot of reforms that are debated today. Like gun control, immigration, and NDAA.
People killed, cop shot, massive manhunt= Gun control
These "terrorists" came from Chechnya with radical ideals= Immigration
10000 cops looking for a dangerous 19 yr old dropping bombs= Drones for terrorists on US soil to reduce police casualties.
Originally posted by old_god
Whatever is posted on this subject ATS, some sensitivity should be shown to the tragedy, people died here folks, regardless of what, who when and why, innocent people and there is no justification.
However there are massive holes in the story which I hope do get plugged and on a positive note, the quick turn around of these events will at least bring closure to the families involved which has to count for something.
But...this is worth looking into for those that are capable and willing:
1. The FBI were caught a while ago in a sting operation that they instigated from start to finish trying to entrap various people in Canada to the point where one of the guys actually complained to the authorities that he was being setup by agents.
2. The drills, everyone went on about the drills - perfectly normal thing to do in any large event and something I would expect by the local forces however what is alarming is how on the speakers 5 minutes before the bombs went off people were being repeatedly told "It's a drill, don't be alarmed" or something to that effect.
3. The props: the people in and around the event that were supposedly taking part in the drill and then some how ended up being the victim. Take the chap in the wheelchair, an Vet who was injured in the line of duty being wheeled away and no one corrected the public on the actuality of the photo (i.e. that he was just a prop but quite rightly was being wheeled away from what had become a real scenario).
4. The exact specific event occurred as the drill being carried out, the exact...think about that for those that are of a mathematical and statistical mind - here science will be bent out of shape to fit the will of the story.
5. Two popular and maybe slightly troubled guys who suddenly turn into explosive experts and are able to run rings around the police and the more advanced tactical forces.
6. Even more disturbing - if the older sibling was wearing some kind of mobile IED device and/or suicide device why the **** did the police go in gung-ho and run him over?! Not being funny but if someone said he was armed like that I would stay well away to ensure I don't make go bat-# crazy and set it off and also to not get blown to bits myself!
7. The FBI had these guys under surveillance for ages but did nothing? And those tweets, who doesn't say stuff like that, hell if they scan ATS they will find ripe material on sides of any fence black or white!
Here is what I think happened...
They were being monitored for ages, either part of some entrapment operation and/or just good patsies for a future operation.
One or both are approached under the guise of making good money if they get involved in some drill and/or movie as props.
They are told the whole event start to finish so they go in and fulfill their roles believing they will get paid well after the job, oblivious to the fact that the so called props explosives were real.
They go off, killing and injuring so many...the two would be culprits see the mayhem and realize something is wrong and probably quite quickly (too quickly for the agencies involved) workout they are being setup so leg it. They also find out the were equipped with real items and/or they happened to have stock of the weapons because they really did have extreme views which the FBI took advantage of (as they have a track record of doing).
This is just an idea...takes nothing away from the tragedy and the loss that occurred and boggles the mind that there are people out these (not these two though) who have some very twisted views of the world and are capable of writing off people just to push a cause through.
The real drama is how the media raped the story non-stop, slapped into peoples faces, stories filled with racist xenophobic overtones.
The real tragedy folks is how so many bills have been fast tracked through now, taking away any liberties Americans have or had and more tragic the systematic witch hunt of two innocent people, namely the guy Sunil (who is not even remotely a Muslim) who was a victim of false reporting and a nationwide/internet wide crowd sourced open court where he was guilty from the word go.
Add all the threats he received its not surprise and shock he is missing now for two days, either dead or on the run for nothing.
And then Salah, the 17 year old boy whose life is ruined now by the same witch hunt, made worse by the fact that an entity like the New York Times not even remotely apologizing or accepting they were the ones who instigated the whole sordid affair (the witch hunt and vilification of these individuals).
This is the real America, deeply racist, xenophobic, paranoid, schizophrenic, psychotic and completely deluded.
The sad thing, the rest of the world is becoming just like that...god help us all.