It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NotAConsumer
reply to post by goou111
I dont need nasa to tell me there may be life out there. I already know that and havent had any alien encounters, its easy, i think for myself.
Originally posted by Covertblack
So the first alien we encounter will be a whale.
Originally posted by pacifier2012
"Believed"..."We think..." !!!
The truth is they have no idea really. It's all guess work and 'hope' that it was the case because if they could find one it would support big bang evolution theories.
The trouble is they are thinking evolution in the terms of life as we know it, they way we see it and experience it so they look for planets like ours that support life they way ours does,
How dumb is that for a group of scientists !!!!.
Originally posted by goou111
Originally posted by gortex
Originally posted by goou111
everytime I take more than 2 minuts to write something I get timed out wtf
Yeah I've been having that with Chrome ... Firefox Is OK though .
On topic .
Great find and exiting news
Any mention of distance ?
cosmiclog.nbcnews.com...
NASA's Kepler planet-hunting probe has identified two potentially habitable planets only a little bigger than Earth, circling a star that's 1,200 light-years from Earth
Originally posted by Skywatcher2011
Forget about sending people to Mars...how about finding ways to send people into outer space to observe these water planets! That's what aliens do
Astronomers said Thursday that they had found the most Earth-like worlds yet known in the outer cosmos, a pair of planets that appear capable of supporting life and that orbit a star 1,200 light-years from here, in the northern constellation Lyra.
[Astronomers] took the first stab at trying to model conditions on the Kepler 62 planets. That is a tough job because the system is too far away for astronomers to measure the masses of these planets, which would allow the densities and compositions of the planets to be pinned down, or to inspect and analyze their atmospheres with telescopes.
Originally posted by goou111
Two water worlds, planets apparently covered completely by oceans, are within their star's "habitable zone" and represent the most exciting discovery yet by the planet-hunting Kepler telescope, NASA announced Thursday
They say there may be life but any life would be underwater life and the planets would be beautiful blue worlds orbiting an orange star exciting
nasa live video at the link
www.dailybulletin.com...
[
These planets are unlike anything in our solar system. They have endless oceans," said lead author Lisa Kaltenegger of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy and the CfA. "There may be life there, but could it be technology-based like ours? Life on these worlds would be under water with no easy access to metals, to electricity, or fire for metallurgy. Nonetheless, these worlds will still be beautiful blue planets circling an orange star -- and maybe life's inventiveness to get
eta
cnn is saying 3 planets
3 new planets could host life
www.cnn.com...
Scientists announced Thursday the discovery of three planets that are some of the best candidates so far for habitable worlds outside our own solar system -- and they're very far away.
NASA's Kepler satellite, which is keeping an eye on more than 150,000 stars in hopes of identifying Earth-like planets, found the trio.
Two of the planets -- Kepler-62e and Kepler-62f -- are described in a study released Thursday in the journal, Science. They are part of a five-planet system in which the candidates for life are the farthest from the host star.
The host star -- the equivalent of Earth's sun -- takes the name Kepler-62, where the individual planets are designated by letters thereafter.
edit on 18-4-2013 by goou111 because: (no reason given)
you'll notice that "the potential for water MUST be taken with a grain of salt", so says the astronomer lady kaltenegger.