BOSTON BOMBING breaking supposed hacked photos of suspects now on alex jones navy seal hats?

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000

Originally posted by Tahnya86
reply to post by Wrabbit2000

 

i think the point is any person who is not blinded by the American brainwash campaign can tell that its abit to perfect and like something out of hollywood when those bombs went off, its been a while since america has had a "Terroist attack" so the GOV decided to put the people on their toes and in fear again and with the shootings aswell this is perfect to gain gun control, surveilance and potentialy martial law over the people, when i saw those bombs go off i thought to perfect, to, perfect, and then i thought, wait for the lies, boston was perfect because no one would expect there to be the place to face a attack. ball bearings in a black bag, how... cliche'.

Yeah, right. ....because Governments always set up murderous scenarios while taking unbelievably reckless chances and all to kill a small handful of people with dozens more injured. All that risk and cost, for what accomplished again? 'to keep people on their toes'??

I think folks need to slowly put down the super size cups of cool-aid and take a BIG step back for a moment. The paranoia reaches near clinical illness levels in some areas here where there is STILL nothing beyond speculation for cause or basis to theorize that direction.

again Wrabbit
911 777 accrding to people who were THERE this was also a DRILL
like HITLER's riechstag fire,,and the POLISH ATTACK on Germany

Originally posted by Danbones

Originally posted by Echtelion
"BOSTON BOMBING breaking supposed hacked photos of suspects now on alex jones navy seal hats?"

Huh....

What is that supposed to mean? THat Alex Jones is wearing Navy Seals hats, and Boston bombing is breaking apart photos?

Could you care writing real, intelligible titles, OP? That's just a bunch of keywords put together... lazy.

edit on 18/4/13 by Echtelion because: (no reason given)

what no opinion on the avctual topic at hand?
thats what you think is important?
lol
thats just dimb

say you wouldn't be one of those folks running this "drill" would you
cause that is something they would say if they were here

edit on 18-4-2013 by Danbones because: (no reason given)

Why should I make the effort of giving my opinion on a subject you're not doing the effort of articulating?

It's like some wild crazy guy gets in my face on the sidewalk, shouting "Obama minions taking over UN DHS Big Brother drones FALSE FLAG!!!" And I'll be like... "Uh, okay... whatever you say!"

I mean... just write a real title, and intro for your link, that's all. It's not that hard, you know...

reply to post by Danbones

I'll just say that comparing 2-3 dead in Boston to what started World War II IS paranoid to the point of disturbing and cause to step wayyyyy back from where you're standing. Give some basis.. some suggestion beyond amateur sleuthing to the point of silliness and maybe it'll be considered but it's *ALL* speculation with *NO* logic or even gain that the U.S. Government would have gotten. They couldn't even get their gun control garbage passed.

I'd call it a 100% failure of a false flag. A failure with bells on if THAT was the case here.

*I hate to be so critical but c'mon ... Theory needs SOMETHING to hang on for basis. Paranoid claims of 'The Government did it' with 100% empty reserves to give depth or meaning to that claim are beyond just tough to handle ....it's embarrassing. it's.....the national enquirer.

question the govt as much as the next person, but this one is a reach. Those guys in the tan cargo pants and matching jackets are obviously officials in some capacity. I think they were there monitoring the event, as is probably likely with most large events of this nature. They are way too obvious to be planting bombs, imo. Why the heck would they dress the same? I looked at these pics yesterday and immediately felt that the two guys together (one with white hat and bag, and the guy in bright blue with duffel bag), seemed to be the most viable suspects. On the news last night, they described the FBI suspects and that description matched the two guys I reference.

What is more suspicious to me is the Saudi "person of interest" they had initially. The guy was questions, they searched his apt, took stuff out, then he was released. Then Obama meets with the Saudi prince last night in an unscheduled meeting, and magically that Saudi suspect is deported as a matter of "national security." In this situation, I am way more concerned with the administration covering this one up, then I am with them being the perpetrators. Just my two cents...

deadspin.com...

well AJ said these TWO guys were PATSIES now looks like they will be suing some papers

again
its the drill aspect that is the key to this

Ya know I question the government as much as the next guy, but wouldn't you suppose that they would claim this was a drill if they had prior intel and needed to try and find the bombs or suspects without causing a panic? Seems plausibe to me and makes more sense than most anything else.

It explains the claims of DRILLS

It explains the dogs and military personnel searching before the explosion

I mean what would you do? Immediately stop the marathon and possibly find nothing (who knows how much intel they had) or send in a small group of professional folks to look for suspects before they plant the bombs.

Idk, people are doing some crazy ish these days

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by Danbones

 

I'll just say that comparing 2-3 dead in Boston to what started World War II IS paranoid to the point of disturbing and cause to step wayyyyy back from where you're standing. Give some basis.. some suggestion beyond amateur sleuthing to the point of silliness and maybe it'll be considered but it's *ALL* speculation with *NO* logic or even gain that the U.S. Government would have gotten. They couldn't even get their gun control garbage passed.

I'd call it a 100% failure of a false flag. A failure with bells on if THAT was the case here.

*I hate to be so critical but c'mon ... Theory needs SOMETHING to hang on for basis. Paranoid claims of 'The Government did it' with 100% empty reserves to give depth or meaning to that claim are beyond just tough to handle ....it's embarrassing. it's.....the national enquirer.

edit on 18-4-2013 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)

you forgot:
911
started a war

gulf of tonkin
started a war
no dead

paranoid?
never let a few fackys get in the way of a selfserving opinion eh?
GET REAL Wrabbit
GET REAL

reply to post by Danbones


For a drill to work properly it needs to be planned and advertised...

Where's the planning and advertising of it?

Originally posted by phishfriar47
Ya know I question the government as much as the next guy, but wouldn't you suppose that they would claim this was a drill if they had prior intel and needed to try and find the bombs or suspects without causing a panic? Seems plausibe to me and makes more sense than most anything else.

It explains the claims of DRILLS

It explains the dogs and military personnel searching before the explosion

I mean what would you do? Immediately stop the marathon and possibly find nothing (who knows how much intel they had) or send in a small group of professional folks to look for suspects before they plant the bombs.

Idk, people are doing some crazy ish these days

a might be is not always an is
911 and the dancing Israelis kinda refutes your theory

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Danbones

 

For a drill to work properly it needs to be planned and advertised...

Where's the planning and advertising of it?

dunno
advertising: most of the people in the NATO countries STILL don't know that 911 and 777 were drills
the planning:
mmmm if it ever came out there was drill that killed people?
hmmm remember the tonkin incident the US guv sat on that for how long?

I am part of the Navy Seals also because I have a hat.

reply to post by Ozymandias121


Navy Seals or not it seems they were there in an official capacity, there is more than just the 2 Photographed, there is a picture of 7 of them together including the 2 mentioned.. Chatting by some type of Black SVU after the explosions. I'm leaning towards they had intel and were there for that reason.



In fact I count 8

reply to post by Taggart


Or they were there to make sure everything goes according to plan....

reply to post by Ozymandias121


Not very inconspicuous vs hiding in plain sight.

Lets skip the dance.

some one may have wanted to frame the seals too...

reply to post by Danbones


Just google mass casualty drill

Hundreds of articles about different drills being held all over the place.

Perhaps you can point us to one about the Boston drill?

reply to post by Chadwickus


Didn't the Boston Globe tweet there was going to be a bomb squad drill that day?

Originally posted by FlyingFox
lol, pre planted? I guess people were tripping over them for days?

Cmon Now... I didn't imply they were just left sitting in backpacks for Pete's sakes!
Pre-Planted in the buildings, or in something fixed. The world is much more sophisticated.
I mean what would you do if you were the bomber? Would you be smart about it?
Would you want to be caught? Would you just walk the bomb in to blown apart along with your victims?
If it were an inside job or state sponsored it would have been expertly done!
And we can't rule that out now can we?

reply to post by Danbones

I am being real. 9/11 formed the basis for a war within 60 days following the event. We all knew, the day it happened, war would follow though. It was only a question of who we'd be at war with. The Patriot Act came out of someone's desk drawer and was passed so fast you'd think it was a fart in the wind for all anyone had time to consider it ahead of time.

That was the accomplishment from 9/11. Whether the Government actually did the deed for what caused it or just exploited the living daylights out of it from the moment it began is a fair debate IMO. They did use and abuse it for all it was worth, either way.

The Gulf of Tonkin formed the event that is most attributed to starting the Vietnam War with major deployments and commitment of combat vs. advisor forces. Again, a small event but with enormous outcomes and consequence. The cause and effect was there.

Pearl Harbor... Same thing ..and little things like the fact the water tight doors were open, ship wide across almost every ship in the harbor for an inspection tour which never came, lead to many valid questions. Many questions indeed.

This though?? We're seeing another Olympic Park bombing level event from what will likely turn out to be another nut case. Al Qaeda doesn't think small. They think BIG for symbolism. Terrorists need to cause terror ..and a one-off with a few dead and 100+ injured is called an average day in much of the world, as sad as it is to say. It's no MAJOR attack by any stretch of the imagination. It's simply new to us, as Americans. The rest of the world must be baffled by the uproar, quite frankly.

Still... being real is looking for motive to make sense of Government or large scale organizational involvement. I don't see it here and I haven't from the word go. Multiple attacks or much larger bombs? Perhaps. Bombs with chemicals to add to the impact? Again, that would make me REALLY wonder.

This was hillbilly amateur hour though and to a bit of an extreme, IMO. It's almost insulting to the CIA to suggest American Intelligence or Government had even a passing involvement to something so cheesy and cowardly in nature. Just my thoughts.

Originally posted by Taggart
reply to post by Ozymandias121

 

Navy Seals or not it seems they were there in an official capacity, there is more than just the 2 Photographed, there is a picture of 7 of them together including the 2 mentioned.. Chatting by some type of Black SVU after the explosions. I'm leaning towards they had intel and were there for that reason.

In fact I count 8

edit on 18-4-2013 by Taggart because: added pic

edit on 18-4-2013 by Taggart because: (no reason given)

or they were security

www.thecraft.com...