It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nuke2013
If the bombs were ment to go off stratigicly or in sequence...It was a failled attempt to start with, lack of planning and poor judgement I'm thiking.
Bomb #1 goes off at the start line where a mass is assembled,
#2 goes off furter away and making people run away from bomb #1 blast....
wouldn't a carefully planned attack have bomb #2 go off first, make all the people run toward the finish line and assemble in bigger numbers seeing that that is where the nearest exit wasm the let bomb#1 go off soomething like 1:30 after bomb #2 and not 8 seconds ???
Whom ever did this wasn't a very bright person in my opinion, at least not planned to far ahead of time.
my though is leaning towards an angry Democrat voter fed up with all this gun talk and rights being taken away.
Bombs were crude, ballbearing and nails, most likely wrapped around a pipe bomb....So...I'm thinking "Billy-Joe Curtis" from South Carolina just got fed up and .........
Originally posted by IntoxicatingMadness
Well the fact that the attacker was Saudi Arabian leans towards this. Seems to not have been of Korea, suppose I should have known, why do a small bomb when you're gonna nuke?
Originally posted by lnfideI
YOu should probably edit your post to remove someones real name.
You are going to attract all sorts of interest you do not want.
What you just posted leads to someone, or are you giving a tip you want me to forward to the FBI?
Thanks.
Originally posted by Nuke2013
If the bombs were ment to go off stratigicly or in sequence...It was a failled attempt to start with, lack of planning and poor judgement I'm thiking.
Bomb #1 goes off at the start line where a mass is assembled,
#2 goes off furter away and making people run away from bomb #1 blast....
wouldn't a carefully planned attack have bomb #2 go off first, make all the people run toward the finish line and assemble in bigger numbers seeing that that is where the nearest exit wasm the let bomb#1 go off soomething like 1:30 after bomb #2 and not 8 seconds ???
Whom ever did this wasn't a very bright person in my opinion, at least not planned to far ahead of time.
my though is leaning towards an angry Democrat voter fed up with all this gun talk and rights being taken away.
Bombs were crude, ballbearing and nails, most likely wrapped around a pipe bomb....So...I'm thinking "Billy-Joe Curtis" from South Carolina just got fed up and .........
Originally posted by Nuke2013
Good lord man...Relax...I put the name in brakets as in meaning FICTINIONAL name. could of put in " Billy-Bob "
Originally posted by lnfideI
YOu should probably edit your post to remove someones real name.
You are going to attract all sorts of interest you do not want.
What you just posted leads to someone, or are you giving a tip you want me to forward to the FBI?
Thanks.
Originally posted by Nuke2013
If the bombs were ment to go off stratigicly or in sequence...It was a failled attempt to start with, lack of planning and poor judgement I'm thiking.
Bomb #1 goes off at the start line where a mass is assembled,
#2 goes off furter away and making people run away from bomb #1 blast....
wouldn't a carefully planned attack have bomb #2 go off first, make all the people run toward the finish line and assemble in bigger numbers seeing that that is where the nearest exit wasm the let bomb#1 go off soomething like 1:30 after bomb #2 and not 8 seconds ???
Whom ever did this wasn't a very bright person in my opinion, at least not planned to far ahead of time.
my though is leaning towards an angry Democrat voter fed up with all this gun talk and rights being taken away.
Bombs were crude, ballbearing and nails, most likely wrapped around a pipe bomb....So...I'm thinking "Billy-Joe Curtis" from South Carolina just got fed up and .........
Originally posted by Nuke2013
Good lord man...Relax...I put the name in brakets as in meaning FICTINIONAL name. could of put in " Billy-Bob "
Originally posted by lnfideI
YOu should probably edit your post to remove someones real name.
You are going to attract all sorts of interest you do not want.
What you just posted leads to someone, or are you giving a tip you want me to forward to the FBI?
Thanks.
Originally posted by Nuke2013
If the bombs were ment to go off stratigicly or in sequence...It was a failled attempt to start with, lack of planning and poor judgement I'm thiking.
Bomb #1 goes off at the start line where a mass is assembled,
#2 goes off furter away and making people run away from bomb #1 blast....
wouldn't a carefully planned attack have bomb #2 go off first, make all the people run toward the finish line and assemble in bigger numbers seeing that that is where the nearest exit wasm the let bomb#1 go off soomething like 1:30 after bomb #2 and not 8 seconds ???
Whom ever did this wasn't a very bright person in my opinion, at least not planned to far ahead of time.
my though is leaning towards an angry Democrat voter fed up with all this gun talk and rights being taken away.
Bombs were crude, ballbearing and nails, most likely wrapped around a pipe bomb....So...I'm thinking "Billy-Joe Curtis" from South Carolina just got fed up and .........
Originally posted by FreedomEntered
reply to post by RAY1990
Absolutely - You cant blame every Muslim for a terrorist activity. But you have the freedom to DISLIKE any religon or cult etc that you want to. However, that doesnt change much. As it stands we simply have to be tolerant of each others personal faith. As long as it doesnt infringe upon others.
Muslims need to challenge the belief, that is a section of them, the belief that if they act against others in the name of Allah they go to heaven. I mean the types that blow themselves up along with others. Generally think they are dying as martyrs. Some are brainwashed from childhood to believe this .edit on 16-4-2013 by FreedomEntered because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FreedomEntered
reply to post by lnfideI
Well you know history has proven you cannot " steriotype " who hates who.
Say for example, British Royality being friends with the Nazis.
So steriotyping is also idiotic.
Nutters are from all levels of society.edit on 16-4-2013 by FreedomEntered because: (no reason given)
What he did was wrong but he did hit a building, not a crowd of people, there have been a few but not like this, if this was an attack there is more than they are not saying or whom ever did it lost nerve. Just does not make sense to have 2 bombs on the same side of street and so far apart.
Originally posted by PheonixReborn
Originally posted by phantomjack
I must agree with you. I do not see a militia group taking out its own people. That just makes no sense.
Timothy McVeigh
Originally posted by milkyway12
In my opinion, this act deserves a war. We need to go in and send Iran to the stone age, if the Iranian people cannot oust the regime, then we will.
We put Iran down, then a lot of terrorists are going to be left out for dry.edit on 15-4-2013 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by JustTheMan
Sorry, I've came into this thread late, so have we got a name of the bomber? Billy Joe Curtis? I'll get it on twitter now to get the word out. ATS gets the news before the MSM again!! Way to go guys!!
Originally posted by Nuke2013
Good lord man...Relax...I put the name in brakets as in meaning FICTINIONAL name. could of put in " Billy-Bob "