BREAKING:Explosion At Boston Marathon

I will add some pics of older gentleman with the grey stripe backpack. I had seen this on liveleak. I refuse to speculate and participate in the witch hunt. However, I do think this back pack the guy is wearing looks more like the remnants of the charred one IMO.

Photos Here

Ok questions about these pics floating around





In the bottom photo is the square is that the backpack?

If so i see a few backpacks in those before/after pics but nothing with the reflective stripe..

Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by Indigo5

 

huh ?? BSed what ? what about a 'maybe' is BS to you ?

political baiting ??? how do you figure ?
are these prior convicted bombers automatically exluded in your book and if so, why ??

you don't approve of FR, don't use them, provide your own souce and stop knocking the ones provided when YOU asked.

hmmmm, rather review the list of Czars (provided by FR), you just claim its bunk ???
neato.

Oh I do dismiss Free Rebulic threads as a news source...like any sane person would do..but all the same I read the trash you provided and no where in the link of freaky trash claims does it accuse any of the Presidents "Czars"...as being members of the expired, radical, "Weather Underground"...while you claimed that they were "government employees/czars today"

So yes...even by the standards of your own your own bottom-of-the-barrel link you outright lied...and for the sake of baiting and derailing the thread.

Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by neo96

 

i wonder how many posters here remember the WU bombings of the 60s & 70s ??
those 'perpetrators' are government employees/czars today.
who'd've thought they could do that ??

reply to post by misfit312


I've seen that image of the object on the ground on the road side of the fence a couple of times now, and I think that is misleading. It looks more like a sand bag to me, used to weight down the fence.
It certainly doesn't look like anything anyone would have been able to get into that position without suspicion. It stands to reason that they would have hidden their explosives in a back pack, and that is a little too obvious and unusual to be sensible.

Also, in the second image after the explosion, there doesn't seem to be any visible damage to the side of the trash can. If a bomb had just gone off right next to it, with the force to do damage ten feet away on the front of the building, there WOULD be more damage to that bin. There would at leas be a scorch mark up the side of it, and denting from the shrapnel. But there's nothing visible on it at all.

Originally posted by WonderLustKing
I will add some pics of older gentleman with the grey stripe backpack. I had seen this on liveleak. I refuse to speculate and participate in the witch hunt. However, I do think this back pack the guy is wearing looks more like the remnants of the charred one IMO.

Photos Here

WE NEED background checks and 3 month waiting period for backpack purchases!!

The battery that was part of the bomb.



www.amazon.com...=cm_cr_pr_product_top




For a RC car.

reply to post by Rocker2013


I understand about the bag..

I was talking about the debris in the road in the after pic right next to the guys foot who had his clothes blown apart...

I was asking if that is the backpack in first photo...

place hover sensors in regions of large mass humans
these sensors are FIT with radio/chem/bio detecting mechanisms

then when large ammunitions or weapons are detected the DRONES
respond to the human threats... With active responses human guided or with alert human system.

transmitted-

Originally posted by Rocker2013

Originally posted by Cbell77

This image is one of the most accurate and important as far as I can see. Going from other images that bag is resting on the exact spot where the dark explosion stain is seen on post-blast images of site one. There is a walk through in the fencing around the store front, and the scorch mark is on the ground directly in front of it, this image shows a bag (or something resembling a bag?) directly in that spot.

It would incredibly important to see any images before or after this one, and to know exactly when this photo was taken.

Edit: sorry, incorrect image referenced, correct one now added.

edit on 17-4-2013 by Rocker2013 because: (no reason given)

Where is the metal fence that it was near? The fence was right next to the black spot.

1. It was initially claimed that the bombs were left inside trashcans, and that ALL trashcans were supposed to be removed from the site by the police earlier on.

So it could be that the bombers actually carried those heavy trashcans and placed them there. If so, then the clue would lay in any out of focus pics of guys carrying trashcans around, and where those trashcans were bought or stolen from if anyone saw anything.



2. Those bombs have to be heavy in order to cause the huge fireball and damage seen, as it is no letterbomb sized or a paper bagged macdonald burger and frieds. Thus they would have to be carried as an appendage. The clue lays in people having big bags, male or female, not just backpacks.

There will be many to search, as there are thousands of folks there. But it can be shortened down to a few as not many may be carrying big bags, or leaving empty handed without their bags later.


3. Handphone cameras aren't often as clear as desired, but there are software that can process the pic to make or even add in details that cannot be seen, such as using alogorithms based upon surrounding pixels to predict a missing pixel within an enlarged image to show a clearer picture.

reply to post by Indigo5

yeah, yeah, yeah, do your own research or get a secretary.

you don't know who the members of the WU were so how are you going to dismiss any of the czar/CPA members of today ?
one of the czars is a blood relative of a high profile member of the group.
i'll leave it to you to determine which one.

your terrible attempt to derail failed then and it's failing now, so you might want to catch up and diss the newest possibility, the IRA.

Originally posted by roadgravel

Originally posted by Rocker2013

Originally posted by Cbell77

This image is one of the most accurate and important as far as I can see. Going from other images that bag is resting on the exact spot where the dark explosion stain is seen on post-blast images of site one. There is a walk through in the fencing around the store front, and the scorch mark is on the ground directly in front of it, this image shows a bag (or something resembling a bag?) directly in that spot.

It would incredibly important to see any images before or after this one, and to know exactly when this photo was taken.

Edit: sorry, incorrect image referenced, correct one now added.

edit on 17-4-2013 by Rocker2013 because: (no reason given)

Where is the metal fence that it was near? The fence was right next to the black spot.

The fence is right behind it, it has an image attached to the railings. You can see this blown off the fencing in post-blast images.

If you look a little behind it, less than a foot away, there is a black and orange (kind of amber) graphic, this was signage attached to the fence.

You can also see women standing against the front of the enclosed fencing area outside the store in this image.

reply to post by Ophiuchus 13

that sounds like something out of Phantasm
i think i'll vote no ... i like my machete

reply to post by Rocker2013


This is in reference to the post pictures (site) at LensCrafters, right? I do see something where the pink lady is standing.

Perhaps organisations such as the OathKeepers and NRA can help with investigations to cover the question if the bombings had been domestic terrorism, such as those in spokane and oklahoma.

There had been plenty of vitrol by a few over the gun, abortions and homosexual issues that may had pushed some over the edge into thinking that violence is the answer.

These few would be trying to look for like-minded, and organisations such as the Oathkeepers and NRA may be the ones they turn to first, before being rejected outright, as Oathkeepers, NRA and other militia organisations do not engage in violence while Rule of Law is still adhered in the land.

But they can shed some light over individuals whom may had come across very strongly to demand for violence as a solution now, within their records, conversations or knowledge.

However, it must be noted that every citizen is innocent till proven guilty in a court of law. It is the rule of law that keeps a society alive, protected and functioning, observed, adhered and supported by all, where are all equal in the eyes of the law, so that fairness and justice can be served.

are the sub are ok in this video ?
www.liveleak.com...

read how he see the event !


Let's watch France .....

Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13

 

that sounds like something out of Phantasm

i think i'll vote no ... i like my machete

As technology develops advanced measures to Prevent dangerous outcomes will be reached. Its the balance or the gift and curse.

A compilation of all 'suspect' photos...

imgur.com...

www.capitalnewyork.com...

so here we have an instance of a paper manipulating a photo..in this instance it was to 'hide' a gory scene but.....do i have to ask the obvious question? i will....what else has been manipulated?

i see the pics of the guy holding a backpack in the crowd but were is his location in relation to the blast are?..getting lost with all the pics of the scence now...

reply to post by Rocker2013

the lady circled is holding a jacket, not the fencing.
is this view in front of the Forum or Atlantic Fish ?

the pics of the aftermath reveal both a dual lamp post and a hedge line near the double doors.
where are they in relation to this photo ?

to see what i'm looking at, scroll through/past the gore, about 1/2 way down the page and there are two or three shots of the Forum/AF before & after the blast and from a better vantage point.
cryptome.org...
CAUTION: Link above includes extreme graphic images !!


it appears that the origin should be closer to the street or the glass double doors would be more damaged