It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Carreau
g 1986 August 22, pp. 11-13.
What is that? A book, magazine, newspaper? Has his story been vetted? Does another person verify it? Any proof whatsoever?
The Writing Department itself has a comprehensive library with thousands of books. Additionally, our researchers make use of nearby public and academic libraries. They can also obtain specialized material from other sources by means of interlibrary loans. One of the large university libraries that our researchers use has some five million books, 58,000 periodicals, 5.4 million microforms, and thousands of electronic databases. The Writing Department also maintains a large archive of clippings, experiences, and historical information that is constantly being updated with material from local sources as well as from our branch offices around the world....
Sometimes even minor statements require additional research to confirm their accuracy. For instance, a brother may say in his life story that he was born in Czechoslovakia in 1915. But Czechoslovakia did not come into existence until 1918. So, where was he born? Settling the question might require examining old maps or historical records.
Then, too, a brother may state in his experience that he was baptized in San Francisco on a specific date. Careful scrutiny, however, might reveal that there was no convention or assembly on that date in that city. How can such a discrepancy be reconciled? Individual memories can at times be fragile. While the brother would probably not get confused about the place of his baptism, he might not accurately recall the date of the event. It is usually possible to confirm the accuracy of details by cross-checking various sources of information.
In summary, the Writing Department insists on using only material that is accurate and truthful, even regarding seemingly insignificant details. As a result, “the faithful and discreet slave” can consistently supply spiritual food that brings honor to “the God of truth,” Jehovah.—Ps. 31:5.
Originally posted by Carreau
Your only source is a satanic panic scare piece from the mid 80's that was published by your religion and is out of print. No third party verification, no collaborating witnesses, and no physical evidence, but I'm a slanderer. Got it.
Yeah I'm going to stick with Gordon is a liar.
Originally posted by Manunnaki
reply to post by SubAce
Eyes that see see Christianity as another branch of the occult. Who represent Osiris as Jesus. And Amun as God.
I actually have dozens of other experiences, perhaps hundreds, dating from 1880's to present. So your idea that it was because of some mid 80's "satanic panic" holds no water. So far your batting 0. If you have no proof it is a lie you shouldn't defame the person. It is considered slander. And it is unbecoming of anyone.
Originally posted by Carreau
reply to post by SubAce
I actually have dozens of other experiences, perhaps hundreds, dating from 1880's to present. So your idea that it was because of some mid 80's "satanic panic" holds no water. So far your batting 0. If you have no proof it is a lie you shouldn't defame the person. It is considered slander. And it is unbecoming of anyone.
If you have no proof you don't have dozens perhaps hundreds you have stories, ie nothing. The only person batting 0 is you, no links, no witnesses, no evidence, no nothing. The onus is on you sense you posted the made up story not for me to prove a negative. What truly is unbecoming is passing off fiction as fact and you as a member of this forum should know better.
Originally posted by SubAce
Originally posted by Manunnaki
reply to post by SubAce
Eyes that see see Christianity as another branch of the occult. Who represent Osiris as Jesus. And Amun as God.
Actually that comment was predicted. That is why, if you'll notice in the OP those false demon-gods of Egypt are shown to be in direct opposition to Jehovah. If you are able to see past your occult indoctrination perhaps you'll be able to see it. If not, then so be it.
Originally posted by Manunnaki
Originally posted by SubAce
Originally posted by Manunnaki
reply to post by SubAce
Eyes that see see Christianity as another branch of the occult. Who represent Osiris as Jesus. And Amun as God.
Actually that comment was predicted. That is why, if you'll notice in the OP those false demon-gods of Egypt are shown to be in direct opposition to Jehovah. If you are able to see past your occult indoctrination perhaps you'll be able to see it. If not, then so be it.
That reply was predicted that's why mine will be. The only reason why jehovah had moses back is because the gods do not like to be mocked or used as a tool to do harm unto others who do not deserve it.
In this case moses had the blessings of the gods to free the slaves. So actually it was a shift of blessing from King to slave.
Thats what eyes that see can see.
I observed and participated in hundreds of séances, witnessing most forms of psychic phenomena including direct voice, levitation, ectoplasm and apports [the manifestation of material objects through occult power].
Originally posted by Manunnaki
reply to post by SubAce
Do you realize how illogical it is to believe that jehovah is the all and yet claim that the gods of the occult are different then jehovah or shall i say Amun!
Here see if you can comprehend this.
You have so many choices you can make in any one situation. Therefore you multiple mentalities for one experience in your life. and this is tru to all experiences. So you can imagine the infinite amount of ways you can go about something as with people taking one statement so many ways.
That's why god is an infinite pantheon!
Originally posted by Carreau
reply to post by SubAce
I observed and participated in hundreds of séances, witnessing most forms of psychic phenomena including direct voice, levitation, ectoplasm and apports [the manifestation of material objects through occult power].
Where is the ectoplasm? If he was there and it occurred did he keep it, where did it go? Was a interview with his ex-wife conducted to verify the witchcraft story? Why wasn't it? What is Gordon's last name? Who was his initial church contact? Was he interviewed? Why not?
Look I'm sorry if in your earnest belief of your religion you take this story as truth without any evidence but a critical thinking person would not. What I'm saying is believe in your religion, but not in stories made up by people just to prove a point, Jehovah good, occult bad. If you need it fine, but don't pass it off as fact to everyone else.
Originally posted by Manunnaki
reply to post by SubAce
I knew you couldn't understand it so I didn't listen to the monkey drivel I will celebrate your ignorance and intolerance to other belief systems even if some of them are a little too off the beaten path all the while being the same as yours.
Christianity is nothing new basically you read a history book that has occult gods in it. those occult gods are way older then the religion you follow.
So like I was saying I celebrate your ignorance and intolerance by bumping your thread one last time for all to see.
Originally posted by Carreau
reply to post by SubAce
I take back what I said earlier about religion making someone a better person. In your case it doesn't. You're petty, illogical, narrow-minded, ugly, and ignorant. I don't know if you were like this before you found religion but it obviously hasn't helped and probably made it worse, because now you think you have all the answers. Well for your sake you'd better be right. Because when you die and if you meet your God, if it isn't Jehovah you got some splaining to do. good luck and good bye you're gonna need it.
Originally posted by Cinrad
Why are you replicating whole watchtower articles here and not giving the source? Are you making out that the first post was entirely your own writing?