CNN Shows Thatcher Accepting Donation From Jimmy Saville for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children

reply to post by something wicked


Hi there!
I suppose with the Rob Brydon example, you would have to question how well he actually knew Savile. Was it just a case of 'do charity event and go?' I would expect so and I wouldn't expect Brydon to know...... but Thatcher spent 11 Christmases with the feller! He was also allowed a free run of Buck Palace and asked for advice when appointing advisers to Charles and Di, which has sinced been downplayed by the palace.

I seen this from elsewhere about MT.



"3 million pounds for the funeral of Margaret Thatcher?

For 3 million you could give everyone in Scotland a shovel, and we could dig a hole so deep we could hand her over to Satan in person."

Originally posted by DrHammondStoat
reply to post by Afterthought

 

I know, I find the 'It was the 70s' excuse really odd.

As a child of the 70's and teen of the 80's, in one way I too find it odd - no excuse could ever - ever be given when we are talking about a pre-teen. I do however think that there are points around teens (14 - 16) dressing and acting older and perhaps not being honest about their age. Please note I am not putting forward any excuse for that, neither am I saying for a second in the case of Savile this is even the case. I am reminded though of a famous photo of John Peel with his then lover in the bath when I believe she was either 14 or 15.

Originally posted by DrHammondStoat
reply to post by something wicked

 

Hi there!
I suppose with the Rob Brydon example, you would have to question how well he actually knew Savile. Was it just a case of 'do charity event and go?' I would expect so and I wouldn't expect Brydon to know...... but Thatcher spent 11 Christmases with the feller! He was also allowed a free run of Buck Palace and asked for advice when appointing advisers to Charles and Di, which has sinced been downplayed by the palace.

Helloooo! I understand what you are saying. I was making the point that Mr Brydon mixes/mixed in the circles from which a lot of people have since came forward talking about their doubts. One would have thought if they were so open in expressing them prior to his death Mr Brydon would have been aware and he may have been a little more circumspect about mentioning him quite prominently in his book.

Originally posted by TrainDispatcher
I seen this from elsewhere about MT.



"3 million pounds for the funeral of Margaret Thatcher?

For 3 million you could give everyone in Scotland a shovel, and we could dig a hole so deep we could hand her over to Satan in person."

Is that suggesting Hell can be found buried in Scotland? Hmmm, interesting thought.

Originally posted by muse7
It amazes me as well the amount of people that are worshiping this witch just because she died.

I notice from your profile that you were born in 1991. A year after she resigned. Explain to me how this makes you an expert on her time in office?

Originally posted by Afterthought
UK citizens need to demand that Edwina Currie be brought up on charges immediately and have her guilt or innocence put on trial!
Sure, this info is coming from David Icke's website, but he's already proven that he was right about SoVILE.
www.davidicke.com...
"Thatcher government minister Edwina Currie writing about the Thatcher inner-circle paedophile Peter Morrison"

Thatcher didn’t know? Are you having a laugh? Clearly everyone knew, including many in the media, and what was that Currie said about Chester MP Morrison? – He admitted as much when he became deputy chairman of the party, but said he was very discreet??

Didn't David Icke work at the BBC during the 80's I wonder why he didn't say anything at the time?

I never heard of Jimmy Saville before honestly, but I've heard of Kevin Jennings. Where's the outrage from the left on Jenning's encouragement of adult/teen activities in schools when our POTUS appointed him our school safety czar? Oh yes and then there's the award to the relative of Harvey Milk who was involved in the shooting of Congressman Ryan at Jonestown. Where is the outrage on the left on these things? Defending these people...but then they hate the one conservative woman who "broke the glass ceiling" of Prime Minister.


People on the left amaze me.

reply to post by MrInquisitive


She was a good friend to Reagan, and a conservative. It is totally transparent why people in the UK hate her, they've all become Socialists. She was a friend to Reagan, one of the best US Presidents in American history, despite being surrounded by members of the CFR and the Shadow govt and even Bush Sr who is an obvious NWO player. Reagan told the Soviet Union to, as you guys say, "bugger off", and Maggie backed him up as far as I know.

Originally posted by armed2teeth
This is pretty sick. But when you realize that the media elite/men behind the current are all into pedophaellia due to sex magik, it makes sense

Yes, this is the problem, it is terribly entrenched in the political realm because the Elites can use it against people who don't do what they want. It is used as a blackmail tool, Eyes Wide Shut style, in fact I bet that's why someone made a movie out of the concept, complete with all the midnight masked balls.
For a woman to break the glass ceiling, why is everyone expecting her to also break the International pedo ring too? Isn't that asking a lot for the 80's?

reply to post by alfa1

Personally I suspect its just some variation of rushed incompetence.

Or more, they deliberately tried to cast her in a bad light while pretending to give a good eulogy. After all, CNN is one of the most left leaning media outlets today.

"Didn't David Icke work at the BBC during the 80's I wonder why he didn't say anything at the time? "


Icke got a job presenting Grandstand (sports programme) in the early 80s I doubt he had much involvement with Savile.

a relevant snippet from wiki

His contract with the BBC was terminated in August 1990 thanks to a political row, when he refused to pay his Community Charge, a controversial local tax introduced that year in England by Margaret Thatcher. He did end up paying it, but his announcement that he was willing to go to jail rather than pay prompted the BBC, by charter an impartial public-service broadcaster, to distance itself from him.[

Also what's age got to do with having an opinion about someone? Plenty of people are not too keen on Hitler.

reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus


Thanks for the info. Always wondered how Thatcher got party leadership. Had a lot of gumph on them did she?

reply to post by Rocker2013

This argument is making absolutely no sense. It's built on false claims in the OP suggesting it was "established", and now others are suggesting that the power of the state should be monitoring random TV presenters, and that if they're not they are guilty of something?

And what else could we expect from the Nanny Staters who believe that Nanny Cams monitoring whether parents make their kids eat their broccoli are a normal thing. Where was the US State department when Jay Z and Beyoncé went to Cuba against strict rules banning Americans traveling to Cuba? Celebrities seem to have a fascination for this Communist State. Stephen Stills did perform apparently at Karl Marx theatre in Havana.

Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
My response to your question will come in the form of another question, please forgive me if it seems like I am being a "smart ass" as it's not my intention, but how could they not have known?

edit on 4/10/2013 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)

This is about as nonsensical as me asking how YOU could not have known.

Do you assume that all politicians know each other, or that all TV personalities socialise in the same circles?

So because one man committed disgusting crimes over the course of his career, anyone and everyone he ever met during those years should have somehow "known" that he was an abuser?

What complete and utter nonsense!

Originally posted by teapot
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus

 

Thanks for the info. Always wondered how Thatcher got party leadership. Had a lot of gumph on them did she?

Dunno how she got elected. I wasn't that into UK politics then, but everyone knew she and Reagan were friends.

As Prime Minister she should have known. Her security should have known, after all that is their job. Which we the people pay them to do. The police knew with out a doubt since at least 1963. The BBC knew as they broad cast it on live tell lie vision. MI5 vetted all BBC staff they had an office in the basement, so they knew. Now none of these people told maggie? I find it very hard to understand how she could not have known about Sir jimmy so VILE savil.

Originally posted by illuminnaughty
As Prime Minister she should have known. Her security should have known, after all that is their job. Which we the people pay them to do. The police knew with out a doubt since at least 1963. The BBC knew as they broad cast it on live tell lie vision. MI5 vetted all BBC staff they had an office in the basement, so they knew. Now none of these people told maggie? I find it very hard to understand how she could not have known about Sir jimmy so VILE savil.

Obama should have known about Kevin Jennings when he appointed him school safety czar. But I think we all know why he did that.

reply to post by Rocker2013


I don't see how difficult it is for you to admit that it has been established for decades that this man was a molester/pedophile as it has been mentioned various times that it even happened on live television and that's not including all the other data members in this thread have provided.

Why are you defending this monster and his enablers?

Your motives are very suspect.

If she truly knew this guy was a pedophile and supported him then she truly was evil.