It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Iwinder
Have any of you noticed the Police/Government are doing all they can to ban or make it a crime to take a photograph of anything happening.
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by Iwinder
Have any of you noticed the Police/Government are doing all they can to ban or make it a crime to take a photograph of anything happening.
No, care to show us this police/government law?
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by Iwinder
Have any of you noticed the Police/Government are doing all they can to ban or make it a crime to take a photograph of anything happening.
No, care to show us this police/government law?
Originally posted by Iwinder
let me know after reading it how you feel about photographic/ video footage now and what lengths the people in power will go to.
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by Iwinder
let me know after reading it how you feel about photographic/ video footage now and what lengths the people in power will go to.
Actually you are the one who should read it, just what are they being charged with? It actually points out how silly the claim:
Have any of you noticed the Police/Government are doing all they can to ban or make it a crime to take a photograph of anything happening.
Is, as they are being charged with destroying video evidence....
Originally posted by Iwinder
Back to the OP.......Photographs/ videos cannot be denied hence they are feared by anyone that has done or is thinking of doing an illegal act.
Originally posted by Iwinder
Now back to the OP I would love for any parents to show those photographs to their kids and ask them which building do you think would fall down?
It would be interesting to see what they say.
Regards, Iwinder
Originally posted by Iwinder
Care to deny this?
Well I have and the reason should be obvious to everyone here.
Photographs/ Videos do not warp the known facts.
Regards, Iwinder
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by Iwinder
Care to deny this?
Well I have and the reason should be obvious to everyone here.
Photographs/ Videos do not warp the known facts.
Regards, Iwinder
WELL they did on this thread as NONE of the buildings were the same construction as WTC Towers or WTC 7 , none of them were 110 floors high, none were struck by aircraft or falling debris most of them had concrete cores unlike the buildings in 9/11. They ALL suffered damage/collapsed steelwork the concrete cores stopped total collapse and if you read the reports on these building steelwork had to be replaced and others demolished.
That's the real problem on here members with absolutely NO understanding of construction techniques think a building is a building is a building the OP is a stunning example of that total ignorance!!!
Originally posted by Another_Nut
I suggest you look into the steel and concrtet cores of the towers
Brian Clark was one of the only four survivors from both towers to escape from above where the planes hit. He describess clambering over the shattered walls to break through a smoke-filled stairwell to get out. "Drywall had been blown off and was lying up against the stair railing." he says, "We had to shovel it aside." Another survivor, window cleaner Jan Demczur, found the drywall so soft that he was able to dig through it with a squeegee to break out of a lift he was trapped in.
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by Another_Nut
So what you are saying that there are two options:
a) reinforced concrete that enhances structural integrity
b) drywall
And you logically deduce that drywall could not be it because people would fall through it into the elevator shaft when they trip.
Couldn't it also have been Gypsum block? Brick? Wood? Or some other material? Just asking questions.
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by Another_Nut
It is one of the most basic fallacies. Just because you are not able to understand something doesn't mean it is impossible. Admitting you do not understand something is not a stupid thing to do. We can only understand so much in our lifetime. When you do not have the right qualifications (for instance master degree structural engineering) we should listen to the people who do have the qualifications. We do that with every other subject too. Why make up your own theories in this case? Of course you are free to do so, but to literally make up Tesla weapons that don't even have any evidence at all they even exist, is not just a bit far fetched. We do for certain know that fire exists and weakens steal. That plane impacts are not very good for structural integrity. That gravitational collapses without explosive are possible. Just to name a few that don't require a wild imagination.edit on 9-5-2013 by -PLB- because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by -PLB-
Originally posted by Iwinder
Back to the OP.......Photographs/ videos cannot be denied hence they are feared by anyone that has done or is thinking of doing an illegal act.
Ironically, a lot of photographs, videos and audio evidence is often ignored by people who claim to search the truth. Things like photos of inward bowing of perimeter columns, videos of the penthouse collapse, the complete lack of explosives going off on any video prior to the collapses, damage caused by the plane to the surroundings, are ignored. Its most often the case when the evidence shown on the photos or videos contradicts their believes. Regularry people go as far as to call the photos or videos fake or staged.
On the other hand we see people who have no training in video or audio analysis come to the weirdest conclusion after their own "analysis". It turns out that videos contain more than just known facts, and people make up their own, based on what they want to believe.edit on 9-5-2013 by -PLB- because: (no reason given)