Multiculturalism in the UK has totally failed

Originally posted by redandblue
Out of 38 close family and friends, 4 friends, myself and my sister are the sole remaining residents of the borough we grew up in.

The vast majority are willing to state openly that they left because they no longer felt they belonged, didn't recognise the place, objected to petrol stations & pubs being converted to "social housing" filled with immigrants on benefits.

'Filled with immigrants on benefits' is the key point here.

Who benefits from that?

Only the labour party. Everyone else is paying for it.

Originally posted by ollncasino
Harriet Harman visits her London constituency

Hahaha I just cracked up when I seen that photo...how do you reckon she communicated with the natives lol

Conversation went something like this

Q, what are you unhappy about

A, Not enough benefits

Q Do you find life hard as a single mother, where is the father

A, Which one?

Q What can we do to help you

A, Give me money

Q, Have you tried to get a Job

A, Kind of but it hurt so I stopped

reply to post by boymonkey74


Cheers mate. First of all, I know the word is "bitch", I just didn't know if I could use it, lol. I personally like Manchester and I chose it because it's cheaper than other cities in the UK. I came in the UK after a total of almost 8 years living, studying and working in Spain and Italy. Surely you might not have the nicest weather, but you are A LOT less racist.
I found a job, working there for almost an year now. It's a nice chippy in the Piccadilly. I'm not gonna say the name of the place, but we do make the nicest fish and chips in town.
I don't like football that much, it was never a hobby of mine. I prefer snooker and table tennis.
I-ll tell you one thing ... you people know how to party, I met some of the craziest lads and girls here.
Cheers

reply to post by LUXUS


I'm sorry to say this, but it is not true that Romanians hate English people. It might be true for some of us, but I don't think you should generalize.
Let me ask you one thing, just out of curiosity. You were saying you have Romanian workers. Why did you hired them, when there are so many English people without a job?
Could it be because you pay them less?
If I am wrong I apologize, but if I am right, wouldn't it be a bit contradictory from your part?
All the best

reply to post by LUXUS


Again OP I request you answer my question.What immigrants exactly are you talking about, The Celts, the Europeans, the Anglo Saxon, the Romanians. It seems that from some of your references you are talking about non white immigration. I would like some clarification. Could you also be so kind as to state your ancestory so that we know when your family turned up in the UK. If you are not happy as an immigrant in the UK maybe you should leave instead of complaining.

My point being everyone in the UK is an immigrant... If multiculturalism did not work there would not be a UK now would there..

reply to post by IvanAstikov

Thank you very much. I was just trying to say something that in my opinion is the truth. I hope nobody takes it as something racist. I guess you're right, the few sunny days we get here are beautiful.

Originally posted by purplemer

My point being everyone in the UK is an immigrant...

That's a piece of left wing wishful thinking.

3/4s of British peoples' ancestors arrived at the end of the last ice age between 15,000 and 7,500 years ago. Another wave of immigration arrived during the Neolithic period, when farming developed about 6,500 years ago.

Myths of British ancestry

Originally posted by purplemer

If multiculturalism did not work there would not be a UK now would there..

But the Saxon, vikings etc. did integrate and no such invasion produced more than 5% of the current British genetic stock. Multiculturalism (the Balkanisation of the British population) is a recent left wing invention, rather like the myth that British people are historically immigrants.

British people are not a nation of immigrants nor is multiculturalism anything but a recent left wing invention, no matter how much the left would like to re-write history to make us believe otherwise.

reply to post by leopayaso1987


See this is the issue you want to LIVE in this country but you dont want to belong to it. This is the issue... right here. Once you are part of a country, you are part of its history as history is in the making anyway, you are also part of the politics here. You shouldnt just come here complain and use it for " moneys" you should be in the UK because you are willing to live along side the people as equals. This is best for everyone.

Coming here and helping the economy is fine with your taxes and desire to learn.

reply to post by ollncasino


You are agreeing with my point.

3/4s of British peoples' ancestors arrived at the end of the last ice age between 15,000 and 7,500 years ago.

3/4s of the gene pool that makes up the culture we call British arrived in waves of immigration between 15-7.5 thousand years before present. So I would guess the final 1/4 arrived since and is still arriving today.

Remember also there was no such thing as Britain when the first immigrants arrived here and remember also British is not race.

reply to post by Truth_Hz


London is expensive because its the capital of the UK. And for what you get in London its rather reasonably priced in the scheme of things. But for average folk who want to save and want more space then perhaps its not the best place.Bottom line is ... immigrants shouldnt be taking over a beautiful city.

Maybe one day I will visit cairo and see only japanese or go to spain and see only polish. This is somewhat a pathetic idea.

reply to post by ollncasino


What is annoying is the government dont kinda ask the British people who they want here. If they did . I think everyone would be happy. And you HAVE to start with the best it impacts everyone and everything.

If they allow wild street thugs in chaos comes, if they allow educated hard working types who can integrate and with the culture then this also has smoother results. obvious really...

Originally posted by purplemer

You are agreeing with my point.

75% of the UK's population has been in the UK for at least 7,500 years.

Myths of British Ancestry

That knocks on the head the left's invention that the UK is a nation of immigrants. Unless one calls people who have lived in a country for at least 7,500 years immigrants...

What concerns me about the UK is the amount of food it has to import, in 1939, with a population of, I believe, 30,000,000, the UK imported the same amount of food, one case in point is wheat, it was cheaper to import it than grow it in the UK, with a population of 63,000,000, I wonder how much food is imported, at what it all costs? how much longer can the UK keep importing people and food? And all the junk they seem to need?

reply to post by ollncasino


Yes but these peoples ancestry can be traced back a lot further. My point is not mute they too are immigrants to the UK. You gave me the evidence to back this up yet nothing to refute my opinion.

Originally posted by purplemer

My point is not mute they too are immigrants to the UK.

The 75% of the British population whose descendants arrived in the UK between 7,500 and 15,000 years ago are immigrants?

three quarters of our ancestors came to this corner of Europe as hunter-gatherers, between 15,000 and 7,500 years ago, after the melting of the ice caps but before the land broke away from the mainland and divided into islands.

Another wave of immigration arrived during the Neolithic period, when farming developed about 6,500 years ago.

Myths of British Ancestry

If we are all immigrants, by the same token, we are all African.

The biggest indication that multiculturism has failed is that under EU law racial quotas are legal.It is legal to hire someone because of their race. How can a person be disadvantaged in a multicultural country because of their race? Multiculturalism means that you cannot. So we have a set of people trying to keep getting paid for the work they do on quangos, by keeping and putting quotas in place. This country is becoming a place people go to, to make money: not a place people go to, to live.

Lots of people come here for work and then leave. This is good for them, but is it good for the country culturally?It does have one good point. In a country of people coming here for a short period, the royal family will have no role. The royal family apparently always have felt their position is tenuous because they came here form another place: although a long time ago. However with people not really living here but moving in and out, where is their role? Do they even have one?

I think you may have migration in antiquity confused with immigration in the present.

Your not trying to compare the migration thousands of years ago by anglos to the importation of foreigners today are you? because they are very different.

Thanks casino for educating, not only Mr purple, but myself.

Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by ollncasino

 

Yes but these peoples ancestry can be traced back a lot further. My point is not mute they too are immigrants to the UK. You gave me the evidence to back this up yet nothing to refute my opinion.

Originally posted by ollncasino

Originally posted by purplemer

My point is not mute they too are immigrants to the UK.

The 75% of the British population whose descendants arrived in the UK between 7,500 and 15,000 years ago are immigrants?

three quarters of our ancestors came to this corner of Europe as hunter-gatherers, between 15,000 and 7,500 years ago, after the melting of the ice caps but before the land broke away from the mainland and divided into islands.

Another wave of immigration arrived during the Neolithic period, when farming developed about 6,500 years ago.

Myths of British Ancestry

If we are all immigrants, by the same token, we are all African.

Ooh, you was so near. All HUMAN was the actual answer. There was no place called Africa when our oldest common ancestors first started seeking new territories to conquer and claim as their own.

reply to post by leopayaso1987


Yes you are wrong, they came to the site asking for work and I didn't have any work for them so I told them perhaps another time but they turned up 3 days in a row so I gave them a job cleaning up the site as they had no skills. Had no idea where they were from...anyway they were thieves, stealing copper, tools and all kinds of building materials to sell.

We gave one of them the nickname "italiano" because if asked where he was from by a women he would put on an Italian accent and say "italiano" Ho obviously knew the reputation Romanians have.

ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.