It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by colbe
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by colbe
Okay, sorry for calling them extra books. Just re-read what I said earlier and ignore the word "extra", it's been to long to edit it.
You're are so nice, I can never get upset with you. I just want you to become Roman Catholic. When the Great
Warning happens, you hear it in Protestant prophecy called the "awakening", you will smile and say, that crazy
Colbe kept on at ATS because what she shared is true and the Remnant is Roman Catholic.
Have a quiet and prayerful weekend NTT,
colbe
But I don't have to be Catholic to be saved. I'm just concerned with Christ's death and resurrection for my sins and I'm sharing that with others. You can work out your faith however it best suits you, but I don't have any part of denominationalism.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by colbe
That's irrelevant to me. I'm against denominationalism.
And no, I don't have to be Catholic. The gospel is clear as a bell in Romans 10:9-10 and 1 Corinthians chapter 15.edit on 13-7-2013 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by colbe
Well that's fine, but I never said denominationalism was a Catholic word.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Well I am pleased you are so faithful.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by truejew
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by truejew
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by truejew
Well that doesn't make any sense. No prince destroyed the temple in 70AD. So the Hebrew rendering must be understood, not the Greek translation. Daniel wasn't a false prophet. The Arab Romans destroyed the city and temple.
Are you still trying to find the Scriptures?
Scriptures for what specifically?
For your claims of the Antichrist being Arab, having Arab titles, being from the revived Roman Empire,...
Its hard to do all those copy/pastes with a cell phone. So Google "33 titles of the man of sin", notice the Arab/Muslim theme of some of them, and as far as the Roman Empire being revived that is Daniel chapter 2 and 7.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by truejew
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by truejew
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by truejew
Well that doesn't make any sense. No prince destroyed the temple in 70AD. So the Hebrew rendering must be understood, not the Greek translation. Daniel wasn't a false prophet. The Arab Romans destroyed the city and temple.
Are you still trying to find the Scriptures?
Scriptures for what specifically?
For your claims of the Antichrist being Arab, having Arab titles, being from the revived Roman Empire,...
Its hard to do all those copy/pastes with a cell phone. So Google "33 titles of the man of sin", notice the Arab/Muslim theme of some of them, and as far as the Roman Empire being revived that is Daniel chapter 2 and 7.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by colbe
We all have things the Lord is working on us with, don't be ashamed u have a temper just pray about that.
Some Jewish genealogists[who?] consider him to be a patrilinear descendant of King David and thus a "prince" or Nassi of the ancient Davidic royal line.
Originally posted by truejew
reply to post by NOTurTypical
I do think that Yosef Dayan is one to keep an eye on.
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by truejew
reply to post by NOTurTypical
I do think that Yosef Dayan is one to keep an eye on.
I'd like to think that the anti-Christ would have a less lame web site, lol.
Forum of the Three Commandments
I suspect that it isn't hard to find ridiculous claims among fringe groups in Israel, any more than it is hard to find such claims in fringe groups anywhere. When this guy actually achieves something, apart from claiming to be a descendent of David (as noted with the "Who?" tag in the Wikipedia article, there is likely no real evidence for that claim) and to have supposedly cursed a couple of people he disagreed with (and missing everyone else who held those same beliefs,) maybe he'll be of note, otherwise, he's just some random nut.
The Arab Romans destroyed the city and temple.
Originally posted by truejew
He is also a member of the Sanhedrin.
reply to post by coyotepoet
I believe that every path leads ultimately to God and that there is so much diversity because people resonate to different things.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by NOTurTypical
The Arab Romans destroyed the city and temple.
That's why Titus couldn't stop them from burning it down. It was his intention to use the temple for Jupiter or Saturn, but those zealous arabs, just had to go fulfilling Christ's prophecy that the temple would be destroyed.
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by truejew
He is also a member of the Sanhedrin.
There is no such thing, it was dissolved almost 2000 years ago.
Claiming to have reinstated a long dead institution on one's own authority is as credible as me saying that I'm resurrecting Plato's Academy and now it exists and I'm a member of it.