Scientists find treatment to kill every kind of cancer tumor!!!

reply to post by paxnatus


If everything goes according to the current procedures your mother will "be fine". I do not know how the transplant was made (was it a self-transplant of her irradiated medulla?) but she has now a new life to live.

I am sorry to tell you this but remission does not mean cure. Do not be surprised if further treatment is required.

I wish you all the luck. We are nothing but humans...

reply to post by novrod


Thank you for your comments. Her stem cell transplant was from an unrelated donor, Fresh not frozen and yeah they did cure her....she has less than a 1% chance of her leukemia ever coming back. She developed Graft vs.
Host disease and I am not sure of your profession so please do not think I am insulting you. Unless you are a medical professional in the study of genetics and bone marrow transplants then you may not know what this is.
GvHD is when the donor cells take over the Host cells and recognize the host cells as foreign, therefore they begin eating away the hosts tissue. My mom developed stage IV in the gut and has had a tough recovery...However, she is doing fine.

She has a complete new blueprint, so to speak, so there is no reason the cancer should ever return. Because he bone marrow was completely wiped out leaving in place brand new bone marrow where all the cells in the body are manufactured.

I am also a nurse, so i do know a little bit on this subject but I am on the learning curve.....

Originally posted by Rezlooper
This is great news, but here is a great story of a cure that took place in my family over the past two months. There are too numerous to count natural cures available to us all. People just need to open their minds to the fact that these cures do exist and quit believing everything you're told by the medical establishment.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

During my father-in-law's struggle he has been told constantly things like, "You can't cure cancer...it never really goes away...it's always there, only the traditional doctors can help...this cure has only made you feel better but the cancer is there...etc."

It would be great if this pill is real, but remember that there has always been a cure for cancer and this pill is just another way for Big Pharma to capitalize. Why so many millions of dollars on cancer research and years and years of study and we finally have a pill. Maybe Big Pharma finally realized that the natural cures are gaining more and more steam, so if they don't want to lose out, they had better come up with something. Just a thought, anyways.

Except the above is not true. Your FIL still has an enlarged nodular prostate with a PSA that is still elevated. Unless he has a biopsy that comes back negative, you cannot say he is cured at all.

Unfortunately, even if this proves beneficial in the long run, we will not see it come to market for at least 5 years. First of all, they are going to have to do long term tests to see if anything takes a negative turn. Because while this may work initially, once the body starts to get a sense of what is going on, something could change. That probably is not the best way to explain it, but others have expressed similar sentiment in this thread already. But despite the things that could happen, this is not to say that any difficulties cannot be overcome. It just may take a bit longer.

And the realist in me says that the drug companies may get involved in this process and affect things negatively. I suppose it depends on how much a drug like this would cut into their profits, if it actually went to market. But if they are already ready for human trials, I think that is a good sign. Some drugs take forever before they are tested on humans, so they must feel confident enough at the moment to go ahead with testing in this manner. Hopefully this works out for the best. Cancer seems to run in my family, and there have been many deaths of family members over the years because of cancer. At the moment my grandpa has overcome cancer 2 different times, and my grandmother as well. It is likely the cancer will come back as well, so hopefully I am wrong in thinking it will take forever to get this drug to market.

reply to post by PhoenixOD


Thanks for this - sent it to a friend of my who has leukemia. This ought to be through clinical trials within two or three years I'd imagine, and my friend's white blood count is stable with the latest drug, but it looks like this would wipe it out and thus represent a potential CURE.

Best Regards,

NAM

My grandfather died of brain cancer... well, this seems to work, but is the research going to be allowed to be funded or go mainstream? More often than not, it seems, the government, political groups, and corporations tend to block beneficial science from becoming available to the public.

Originally posted by darkbake
My grandfather died of brain cancer... well, this seems to work, but is the research going to be allowed to be funded or go mainstream? More often than not, it seems, the government, political groups, and corporations tend to block beneficial science from becoming available to the public.

The choke point is really our bloated and bureaucratic FDA. As usual, big government is the problem...that and voters who have the unrealistic expectation of treatments that are 100% effective and 100% risk free and a litigious society that sues for any unsatisfactory outcome. Europe and Japan are not as risk adverse or litigious, so meds go to market much earlier. Of course, OTOH, the US did not have any thalidomide babies because we doe not rush drugs to market.

Originally posted by Blazer
Yet another in an extremely long line of cures, free energy devices, etc that will change the world and yet are swept under the rug and never heard from again.

Isn't it interesting how everyone one of these stories, there is zero follow-up. This miracle treatment will never be developed, and months and even years from now the very people excited about it today (including yourself) will not ask anyone else "hey what happened to that miracle cure"? Very soon you won't care, or you will be distracted by the next big thing which will also never come to fruition.

Every researcher thinks that their discovery is the "ultimate answer" to their problem. They've been doing this since the 1970's. Then they find that there are exceptions to their treatment, awkward, stubborn, difficult to treat cases. Further research is applied, and these researchers find that there are even more genes, chemicals, hormones, signal pathways, marker molecules, antibodies, macrophages, white blood cells involved than they originally anticipated. When the human body has 60,000 genes, that's over 360,000,000 million possible interactions.

reply to post by PhoenixOD


Great news, but I just hope it doesn't fall off the radar and nothing else is heard about it again. When they have promising results like this, I say skip anymore lab testing and allow those people who have exhausted current treatments to have hope and let them try this new treatment now! Have them sign a waiver, there's nothing to lose but a chance to live. Unfortunately, it will be bogged down in government red tape while people will continue to die from this hideous and painful disease.

reply to post by PhoenixOD

Cancer is the body's defence to a fungus.

What they are describing is perhaps one step in the cascade of defensive processes...
...one of perhaps thousands of biological steps...
...this might be developed into some commercial 'treatment' but it is not a cure.

There is no money in a cure for cancer. The money is in the drugs which treat the cancer. If a cure is ever found, be sure it will be suppressed and forgotten about as quickly as it gets noticed.

reply to post by kushness


My Mum died of cancer of the Brain, Liver and Spine thirteen weeks ago. I can post you every drug she took in the six weeks from diagnosis to death if you like but I can promise you that not one was of any kind of specialist expensive type. Her main drugs were steroids to reduce the risk of seizures and Morphine for the pain. Most of her care was provided by two charities. The largest expense generated by my Mums illness came from scans and a biopsy.

I find your ill informed assumptions disgusting and cynical and I hope that you never feel how I do, not for one day.

Well considering cancer is our number one moneymaker in the medical field and a way of population control. I dont see them letting this research go on. In a few months Im sure they will find a way to make this treatment illegal. and squash it. Yeah big pharma! We cant let people have a cure that wont take all their money before they die. We live in a world where monsanto is immune from prosecution and the head of the fda is a monsanto exec. Thisnwill never happen. Hope Im wrong!

Without reading anything but the title this pst is manure. Put a simple list of te cure of all cancer.

reply to post by PhoenixOD


I heard this guy interviewed on "Beneath The Surface with SuzieWeissman on KPFK here in LA driving home. The lead researcher is her brother Erv Weissman. You can find a podcast of the show at archive.kpfk.org... - Look up "Beneath The Surface" Friday April 5, 2013 5:00 pm.

He made it pretty understandable for laypeople and talked about the business involved too.

This is a result of Stem Cell research here in California. Fascinating.

Originally posted by the_philth
Consider this scientist dead within a few weeks ---- probably in a weird jogging accident or reports that he died in his sleep... you know... died of natural causes!

Nahhh he's going to stab himself three times in the back, hang himself then jump in the trunk of his car and drive off a cliff... Just a regular suicide...

For anyone looking for quality help, that I would bet on, is the 'high-end' in scientific complimentary therapy. It's this blood work lab in Greece that you send them a sample, and about $1500, and they do detailed analysis detecting all the markers for cancers, isolate these nasties, your personalized strains of them, and then test these culture against about 50 mainly natural, from the best of them known, cancer fighters. Then they send you a detailed report book loaded with graphs and visual aids from all the data and results. What this does is vastly boosts your ability to screen out things that in your case are time/money wasters, and weed out things that might even make your cancer get worse (in your case).

Having been thru this, I realized that all the money one could ever need to chase every potential complimentary chem they could ever find, doesn't mean much for an afflicted person doesn't mean much for them, when they cant hope to ever ingest all the stuff in any meaningful way.

The lab:
www.rgcc-genlab.com...

Originally posted by Pardon?
The one problem in looking up individual studies as you've done in your A-Z thread is that there are a lot of chemicals, compounds, plant extracts etc etc which work very well at attenuating and/or killing cancer cells...in a lab environment.
The problem is when we try to introduce them via the human body and that's where most of them fail.
For instance, did you know that paracetamol, given directly into a cancer cell is one its most potent killers?
However recently it's been found that it can actually promote the occurrence of some leukaemia's.

The reality you've touched on is too often truth, but it also cuts both ways:

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
Anticancer drugs that target metabolism: Is dichloroacetate the new paradigm?

The fact that DCA has better in vivo activity than in vitro activity suggests that there are unique aspects of solid tumor growth and metabolism that are difficult to recapitulate in vitro and may be important in determining the effectiveness of this class of drugs.

But you might do a double take and note that a great many from the cancer killers list, I made sure had at least one in vivo cancer-type result.

In the thread here I tried to expand in a different direction, my overall point is that a chem that might annihilate one type of cancer, might just fuel another into your death sentence. In people that is. DCA has better in vivo results than in vitro. Some do the lab but nothing in humans, or as with your example, good in lab bad in people.

COMPLEXITY the real lesson here, so as 'the guy that made that huge cancer killers thread', I'm stating that I don't believe there will ever be a one size fits all across the board CURE for every cancer. My logic dictates, that in chemistry... that is mathematical probabilities it just seems an all out impossibility, because cancer organisims from unique person to person in each genesis organ to organ, are all personalized.

For everyone waiting for 'them' to 'give us' 'the cure', to me that way of trying to interpret this world of issue is way too oversimplified. I just cant imagine a future where we all get to look back one day and be like 'good thing that one such and such chemical-whatever was discovered and now all cancers are a thing of the past'. That is, not for a single thing, for all of them. I do think that reality in abstract can be mostly achieved via a diverse range of chems & other solutions, in a mature comprehensive full spectrum array of tools, chems and methods.

I believe that at least 80% of cancers, that the keys to defeating them is already published amongst the 3.8M+ cancer papers over at pubmed. I believe that we humans have already solved these problems, for the most part, and solved them the right way not this radioactive scorched earth overkill methodology that is the norm in oncology....

For me, when I look at some complex biological 'thing', and the research shows 8 different mechanisms identified that inhibit such thing, to not target every known mechanism to instead go all in triple down on
one single mechanism, to the degree of poisoning the subjects, is ruthlessly har

reply to post by Donahue


Hit me with the cure ? Marijuana oil ?

There was a thread on here not long back about using nanites with anti-cancer drug warheads that could be transfused into the bloodstream where they would embed into a tumor. mmmm... could have been nanite diamonds... i cant remember.

bet 7of9 could cure cancer