It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hopechest
So let me get this straight.
If some guy is walking around saying hes going to blow up the Empire State Building, says he has the bomb making material, and has a date...you would think its inappropriate for federal officials to dig into his life because of his first amendment rights?
What about the rights of the thousands of people he may kill?
I guess the government should leave people like this alone. Kinda like they did with Timothy Mcveigh?
Originally posted by Meaningless
reply to post by winofiend
Ever heard of the internet? What ever device connects to a server gets logged and tracked constantly. Your phones, consoles (especially the up-coming ones) computers, laptops, tablets, etc.... even some appliances and in some cases they can even listen to your conversations. This is how they'll track citizens, with the devices they make for us.
Originally posted by Hopechest
So let me get this straight.
If some guy is walking around saying hes going to blow up the Empire State Building, says he has the bomb making material, and has a date...you would think its inappropriate for federal officials to dig into his life because of his first amendment rights?
What about the rights of the thousands of people he may kill?
I guess the government should leave people like this alone. Kinda like they did with Timothy Mcveigh?
Originally posted by 2manyquestions
Is that where we are headed? Will we end up on the "bad guy" list for stating our opinions? These information-collecting centers are just plain wrong. I don't like where this is going.
Originally posted by Hopechest
reply to post by sulaw
Its not apples and oranges. Do you really think the federal government has the resources to put 300 million people under surveillance or do you think they prioritize people who have said or done something that makes them a larger threat than the rest of society?
I'm sorry but if a government is not keeping an eye on what some extreme people are up to they are not doing their job of protecting society as a whole. I'm sure they have an entire file on me simply because of the kind of forums I hang out in and some of the comments I post and I would expect that.
If there weren't I would be mighty disappointed. Now do I see a black van parked outside my house or people in raincoats following me around?
Nope, but I'm also probably not considered a threat. Now if I were to make some outrageous claims about something I plan to do I would expect that to raise flags and stronger more appropriate action to begin. If my neighbor is saying he want's to build and release a chemical weapon in my neighborhood I fully expect the government to find out about it and smash down his door. Its for my protection and something I can't do on my own.
Originally posted by Cabin
reply to post by BrokenCircles
It depends. When somebody truly is talking on the phone about bombing some place or doing something highly illegal, how else would it be possible to prevent it?
There is a difference between tapping and tapping. Probably simply some computer program overhears the talk without even saving it and when somebody talks too much about some illegal acts, like bombings or nukes or something more specific, and it happens a lot, then surveillance might start.
I personally had no problem with something like that, if it existed. I have nothing to hide.edit on 2-4-2013 by Cabin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by hounddoghowlie