It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DarknStormy
reply to post by Belcastro
But You had Iran in the list that did have a Rothschild central bank.. What about Syria?
Originally posted by DarknStormy
reply to post by Belcastro
Syria don't have a Rothschild central bank and I'm sure the Iranian one isn't either. Of course all you need to see iswho are being threatened and you know who are resisting.
For while any family, business or industry can have a bad year, the Rothschilds, financiers of kings and princes when Europe was a royal family affair, have had a bad century.
The fortune has shrunk as world wars battered the Rothschilds' banks; revolution in Czarist Russia killed their best client, and French Socialists nationalized their Paris bank.
Some of the brightest sons went their own way to earn renown as scientists, poets and wine makers. Family feuds sent off others who, as competitors, outdid those who stayed in the fold in terms of wealth and reputation.
...
Europe, meanwhile, had changed. Nations financed themselves through taxes, not loans. The Rothschilds' relationships with rulers became less exclusive, and as royal courts disappeared, less valuable. They financed Russia's southern oilfields, but then their client, Czar Nicholas II, was killed by revolutionaries.
World War I disrupted alliances. Then the Depression bore down. As Nazism took control of Germany, Austria, and in the end even France, the family withdrew. At the end of World War II Europe had changed again, half of it behind the Iron Curtain.
By the 1970's, the House of Rothschild comprised three much smaller banks, N. M. Rothschild in London, Banque Rothschild in Paris, and a Swiss bank founded by the family's most independent, and wealthiest, member, Baron Edmond de Rothschild.
In 1980, Jacob, the English branch's most highly regarded banker, left N. M. Rothschild after Sir Evelyn, its largest shareholder, rejected his proposal to reinvigorate the bank with outside money. A year later, the French Government nationalized the Paris bank and barred the Rothschilds not only from banking, but from using their family name in business.
By then, the contrast between the fortunes of Rothschilds who had made their own way, and those who had stayed strictly in the family, seemed stark.
Originally posted by CIAGypsy
So....for a moment....let's set aside your conspiracy psychobabble and look at the CURRENT situation of the Rothschilds:
For while any family, business or industry can have a bad year, the Rothschilds, financiers of kings and princes when Europe was a royal family affair, have had a bad century.
The fortune has shrunk as world wars battered the Rothschilds' banks; revolution in Czarist Russia killed their best client, and French Socialists nationalized their Paris bank.
Some of the brightest sons went their own way to earn renown as scientists, poets and wine makers. Family feuds sent off others who, as competitors, outdid those who stayed in the fold in terms of wealth and reputation.
...
Europe, meanwhile, had changed. Nations financed themselves through taxes, not loans. The Rothschilds' relationships with rulers became less exclusive, and as royal courts disappeared, less valuable. They financed Russia's southern oilfields, but then their client, Czar Nicholas II, was killed by revolutionaries.
World War I disrupted alliances. Then the Depression bore down. As Nazism took control of Germany, Austria, and in the end even France, the family withdrew. At the end of World War II Europe had changed again, half of it behind the Iron Curtain.
By the 1970's, the House of Rothschild comprised three much smaller banks, N. M. Rothschild in London, Banque Rothschild in Paris, and a Swiss bank founded by the family's most independent, and wealthiest, member, Baron Edmond de Rothschild.
In 1980, Jacob, the English branch's most highly regarded banker, left N. M. Rothschild after Sir Evelyn, its largest shareholder, rejected his proposal to reinvigorate the bank with outside money. A year later, the French Government nationalized the Paris bank and barred the Rothschilds not only from banking, but from using their family name in business.
By then, the contrast between the fortunes of Rothschilds who had made their own way, and those who had stayed strictly in the family, seemed stark.
Restoring the House of Rothschild
There is not a SINGLE Rothschild in the top 100 wealthiest people. So much for "central banking and the New World Order."
Originally posted by Belcastro
In this thread i try to link Israel and Jerusalem to the great harlot of the bible.
also some esoteric astrology about the book of revelation.
Originally posted by paraphi
Thing is, the Bank of England is nationalised in 1946. Oh, I know the Rothschild fantasy is alive and well, but is there any real evidence to demonstrate the BOE is not what it is? Something peer reviewed would be nice. In the mean time have a look at the legislation, no mention of the Rothschilds, but hey ho – it’s what people want to invent that trumps facts.
www.legislation.gov.uk...
Regards
Originally posted by DarknStormy
reply to post by Belcastro
Buddy, you are definetly on the right track.. The problem though is people are not willing to open up to another perspective which pretty much confirms everything that you and others have said. And it really confuses me how people can run down say the Rothschild's, the US Government yet not see the eact same in a religion that has been demonised for the last 20 years or so.
I see you use the bible to work out who the harlot is.. Well let me tell you that under one god, we were given all the scriptures regardless of what label we come under. The very things you are speaking about here are confirmed in the Koran also. The only difference is that the Koran gives you a more detailed account of who the Dajjal is. Now I'm not saying convert to Islam or anything but you shouldn't be afraid to seek information from that book either. The idea of demonising that religion is so you don't find the truth...
Both religions have something in common, We are both fighting the same enemy in the end.. Unfortunetly people will not see this until it's to late. Extremists, Politicians, Even some religious leaders do not represent the 2 big religions. Tell me, what person who is proud of their religion would hide their face fighting for it? No-one... Extremists are scumbags who are helping the Zionists destroy Islam.
Originally posted by Belcastro
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
- Mayer Amschel Rothschild