NASA really did find a nearby Brown Dwarf!! With Pics!

And they are a binary system too. There are two brown dwarfs. They are the third closest stars to our solar system, at 6.5 light years.

NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) has discovered a pair of stars that has taken over the title for the third-closest star system to the sun. The duo is the closest star system discovered since 1916. Both stars in the new binary system are "brown dwarfs," which are stars that are too small in mass to ever become hot enough to ignite hydrogen fusion. As a result, they are very cool and dim, resembling a giant planet like Jupiter more than a bright star like the sun.

Pics here

This is truly great.


Finally evidence to put an end to the "nibiru is a brown dwarf which we can't detect " nonsense from the crazies.

If it can be detected 6.5 light years away we sure as hell would know about one within our solar system.

reply to post by siliconpsychosis


or maybe NASA just hasn't announced it yet.

reply to post by siliconpsychosis


Obviously, you are confused. This IS Nibiru, and soon it will destroy us all!!1!

You fool, the Nibirunians have long ago invented the Dillon-Wagoner Graviton Polarity Generator, and can move their entire star at faster than light speed.

THEY ARE COMING!!11!!

WISE completed its all-sky survey in 2011, after surveying the entire sky twice at infrared wavelengths. The maps have been released to the public, but an ongoing project called "AllWISE" will combine data from both sky scans. AllWISE will provide a systematic search across the sky for the nearby moving stars... and also uncover fainter objects from the distant universe.

Oh noes...!

With the wording of this press release, they're sneakily admitting they are deliberately searching for brown dwarfs that are moving, as well as mysterious distant objects...

N****U?

reply to post by Bedlam


Lets not forget the transdimensional gravity phase momentum drive that allows it to be in perfectly opposite position to the earth in the same orbit therefore hiding behind the sun

reply to post by FlyInTheOintment




Well by definition "moving stars" would include brown dwarfs yes

reply to post by FlyInTheOintment


I agree.....They didn't scrap our shuttle program for no reason. They know something is coming!!

They are also buttering us up, so to speak, with these commercials warning us to be prepared for a potential catastrophic event......no, nothing to see here-move on


I know that a lot of you are offended when someone quotes the Bible; but you will grow up and get over it

However, the Bible has a name for the infamous planet X.... It is called Wormwood.

But your going to have to read it for yourselves. It is quite a read; even for the most die hard GOD and Bible hater........And plus-- you will receive a blessing from GOD for doing as much. It says that at the end of Revelation!

reply to post by siliconpsychosis


It's not really about detection, but rather about disclosure.

Would 'they' tell the masses if a threatening planet-sized spacecraft was approaching from far off in the Southern skies, perhaps carrying the 'gods' of olden days?

I doubt it. They might spoon-feed information in certain ways, to prepare the mind of man to cope better with the shock (when it can no longer be hidden - when the Moon lights up, when the fleet descends - when the paradigm collapses in a heartbeat...)

Anyway, I'm not convinced either way. Nibiru, if it were a genuine contender for freakiest god-carrying planet in the solar system, would surely be cloaked with shielding tech by now, considering how advanced the ancient devas were to start with..

reply to post by siliconpsychosis

any star that appeared to early astronomers to be in a fixed position when compared to other stars, in contrast to the planets, which were thought to be moving stars

Definition 1 disagrees... Planets were referred to as wandering stars.

Definition of MOVING CLUSTER

1
: a cluster of stars that have common motions in space

Definition 2 seems to be a bit open-ended compared with your definition, and says nothing about brown dwarfs..


sou rce, search it and see...

reply to post by FlyInTheOintment


I doubt they would tell, what would be the point?


And....


Tech advances enough to cloak and hide a whole planet, yet make opaque enough to not block light from any stars, and advanced enough To totally negate any gravitional diatortions, gravitional lensing of starlight and energy output of any kind?

Surely if they were able to counteract the entire planets gravity then they have reduced its effective mass to 0 therefore creating another problem......maintaining any sort of directional and velocity control of an.entire planet with no mass?


Just think about how absurd that all is

Originally posted by radpetey


They are also buttering us up, so to speak, with these commercials warning us to be prepared for a potential catastrophic event......no, nothing to see here-move on

They mention elsewhere that they also found 10,000 asteroids.

Originally posted by FlyInTheOintment
reply to post by siliconpsychosis

 

any star that appeared to early astronomers to be in a fixed position when compared to other stars, in contrast to the planets, which were thought to be moving stars

Definition 1 disagrees... Planets were referred to as wandering stars.

Definition of MOVING CLUSTER

1
: a cluster of stars that have common motions in space

Definition 2 seems to be a bit open-ended compared with your definition, and says nothing about brown dwarfs..


sou rce, search it and see...

edit on 1-4-2013 by FlyInTheOintment because: (no reason given)

I.may be wrong but in the context of the article "moving stars" would be defined as any point light source that would be described as appearing to move. "Star" being ANY point point source

reply to post by Ghost375


I know... I heard about that.

I am very uneasy about the next decade.

It will be a time of great sorrow

reply to post by Ghost375

oh noes!
now there are two nibiroos!
what are we to doo!

Originally posted by radpetey
reply to post by FlyInTheOintment

 

I agree.....They didn't scrap our shuttle program for no reason. They know something is coming!!

Can I have $150 to buy a new microscope? I want a new microscope.

If you say NO to my request, then it is proof that you have something to hide, at the microscopic level. What is it you're hiding from me? I want to know now, damn it. I am mad as hell, who the hell do you think you are to tell me that I cannot look at the microscopic level. How dare you sir. What are you hiding. I demand truth NOW.

right?

I know that a lot of you are offended when someone quotes the Bible; but you will grow up and get over it

Praise Jebus!

Originally posted by tinhattribunal
reply to post by Ghost375

 

oh noes!
now there are two nibiroos!
what are we to doo!

We divide the populace into two factions.

One will be the red nibiru, and the other will be the blue nibiru.

As their gods, we must control their fate. Raise the lands above sea level. Cast continent shift spells and diversify them further. Erode their crops, flood their plains. Send natural disasters to wreck their lives, and then betray them as they pray for help.

Then we.. oh hang on, that's populous..

hmm, what do internet, 2 noobierus..

*shrugs*

reply to post by ,


Ghost375, do you, or anyone else, happen to know what the number's "03.11.13" over top of the
photo at the OP's link are for ?

reply to post by azureskys


I'm going to hazard a guess that those are the dates of the photo

Originally posted by azureskys
reply to post by ,

 

Ghost375, do you, or anyone else, happen to know what the number's "03.11.13" over top of the
photo at the OP's link are for ?

edit on 1-4-2013 by azureskys because: added more

Probably the date of the press release.

Although I suspect it's the combination of the safe which holds the real press release. The one the presidents get, and the oil company chairmen, and the mistresses of presidents and oil company chairmen. What that press release says, you don't wanna know!