It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Klassified
reply to post by LoneGunMan
In western society, atheists and pagans are more likely to suffer persecution than Christians by far. And usually, by Christians.
Originally posted by Klassified
reply to post by Malcher
I said it was more likely in comparison. I didn't say it was common. Although I have seen it in my own life, and the lives of others. Persecution doesn't have to be violent either. There are many ways to persecute someone.
Originally posted by Klassified
reply to post by Malcher
I said it was more likely in comparison. I didn't say it was common. Although I have seen it in my own life, and the lives of others. Persecution doesn't have to be violent either. There are many ways to persecute someone.
Originally posted by neo96
People are violent with or without religion.
Whats the difference if its goverment or Allah or God.
Not much
The deal is people are looking at the wrong things when they should be looking at themselves altho people do love to have scapegoats that way they don't have to take responsiblity for anything.
Them evil Christians, Them evil Muslims and person of God knows the greatest lesson taught in religion: forgiveness,turning the other cheek, do on to others as they have them do unto you.
Those lessons are lost on Christians,Muslims, and Athesits no matter where you go or what you believe ther are always bad "apples" in the bunch always will be.edit on 1-4-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by smurfy
reply to post by NorEaster
It is a flawed premise, since there is no, 'game changing' information given. Furthermore, 'Christian' violence is already well known already, as is 'Muslim' violence. I don't see the point.
I disagree, the whole humus of a human being is to live in peace.
Originally posted by WhoKnows100
Your question overlooks a key - the tares mature.
Your question overlooks a key - multiple religious groups ruled Judea (the world).
Your question overlooks a key - the world chooses the 'son of the father' Barabbas
Originally posted by NorEaster
Maybe you folks that frequent this forum can help settle an argument I'm having with a friend of mine. She says that if Atheists acquired information that could literally transform the way that people who live in the modern world perceive religion - and Christianity in particular - and began to succeed in peeling off impressive numbers of theists from (specifically) Christianity as a result of the powerful nature of that information, that there'd be no overtly aggressive reaction from any Christian groups against the Atheists whose information campaign had transformed the public debate. I say that there would be an overtly aggressive reaction, and that these Atheists would be in grave danger.
What do you folks think would be the reaction. I'm aware that there are about 30 million Evangelical Christians living in the US alone. Who knows how many other kinds of Christians there are, but as I see it, the violence potential primarily exists within the ranks of the 30 million or so Evangelicals. Hell, if even .01% decide that their god has approved of the elimination of these Atheists - preventing the damnation of millions as a direct result of their elimination - that's still 30,000 potential Christian jihadists from this one society alone.
Now, keep in mind that what I'm talking about is a real game changer, as far as what these Atheists possess. Not the usual Richard Dawkins drivel. Serious information that's crumbling the Christian credibility from one end of the globe to the other.
Originally posted by Fromabove
Originally posted by NorEaster
Maybe you folks that frequent this forum can help settle an argument I'm having with a friend of mine. She says that if Atheists acquired information that could literally transform the way that people who live in the modern world perceive religion - and Christianity in particular - and began to succeed in peeling off impressive numbers of theists from (specifically) Christianity as a result of the powerful nature of that information, that there'd be no overtly aggressive reaction from any Christian groups against the Atheists whose information campaign had transformed the public debate. I say that there would be an overtly aggressive reaction, and that these Atheists would be in grave danger.
What do you folks think would be the reaction. I'm aware that there are about 30 million Evangelical Christians living in the US alone. Who knows how many other kinds of Christians there are, but as I see it, the violence potential primarily exists within the ranks of the 30 million or so Evangelicals. Hell, if even .01% decide that their god has approved of the elimination of these Atheists - preventing the damnation of millions as a direct result of their elimination - that's still 30,000 potential Christian jihadists from this one society alone.
Now, keep in mind that what I'm talking about is a real game changer, as far as what these Atheists possess. Not the usual Richard Dawkins drivel. Serious information that's crumbling the Christian credibility from one end of the globe to the other.
Christians are threatened every day. In case you don't know, it is the Islams that are doing most of the slaughter of Christians. As for atheists, they are no threat to Christians because any argument they have they always have to end with the words, "nobody really knows...." So no one takes them too seriously.
And lastly, Christianity isn't crumbling at all. There have always been Christians, and there will still be Christians when Jesus Christ returns. And at that time there will only be Christians.
edit on 1-4-2013 by Fromabove because: (no reason given)