Missing bullet documentary actually proves JFK conspiracy

reply to post by TheKeyMaster

This would also explain WHY the brain went missing...

I always believed the brain went missing because it would have revealed damage to the frontal lobes, implying that indeed the last shot was fired from the grassy knoll.

Originally posted by Cosmic911
reply to post by TheKeyMaster

 

This would also explain WHY the brain went missing...

I always believed the brain went missing because it would have revealed damage to the frontal lobes, implying that indeed the last shot was fired from the grassy knoll.

That's a definite possibility... but do you think the military and the people in power would put themselves in jeopardy like this?

This is the key to everything IMO. Do people really think the powers that be would risk Kennedy surviving the assassination attempt? A gun leaves way to many possibilities of botching the whole thing.. just as I think multiple shooters, especially right in the thick of things in the grassy knoll, puts them all in jeopardy. IF there were other shooters they were likely in surrounding buildings where no one would detect them.

And Oswald, or whoever was acting as Oswald, was likely there just to shoot him in the body.. which makes the whole thing much easier to pull off and does the job of making people think it was a gun that killed Kennedy.

reply to post by TheKeyMaster


So tell us what you think it was that killed Kennedy if not a gun.

reply to post by wtbengineer


I don't think people are ready for that answer... haha

And this is precisely why it was used... no one would ever know or believe it.

The ONLY way people could possibly figure it out is if the brain was examined at a later date - like right now. And even then they would likely need witnesses to help corroborate what they experienced to help give some clues what was used - and everybody is dead or too old to probably even remember.

I will be writing something soon that shows people what I feel happened. This is the only way I feel I can convey what I envision fully.

reply to post by stirling

This does not explain, the bullet hole in the WINDSHIELD of the limmo.......
Nor the enhancement film showing shooter on the grassy knoll....
Nor the testimony of the switchman, ( in the tower behind the knoll....)who saw shooters on the grassy knoll, behind a fence.

Good points. Especially the "people" on the train yard parking lot side of fence behind the grassy knoll. There is other eyewitness testimony of "people behind the fence".

Ever seen this one?


On the windshield, it could have been a bullet fragment hole. There were bullet fragments recovered from inside the limo. There are no pics of the broken windshield though? And they sure replaced it in a hurry, didn't they?

reply to post by TheKeyMaster


Well I would be looking forward to reading that. Do you plan on posting it here?

What if the grassy knoll shooters claim is a red herring?

What if the CIA had people at the scene to plant disinfo? People who were working for the CIA directing them away from the real info they are trying to hide?

reply to post by wtbengineer

There are just too many things that don't add up.

I agree with that. Just not the bullet from the front in the neck. Where did it go? If you believe that one young doctor, where did it go? They must have found an exit wound or a bullet in his body? But they didn't. What explains that? There are no other witness corroboration or hidden evidence regarding the throat wound.

Just two bullets hit Kennedy. The one through his back out the front and into Connelly... and the one in the head.

reply to post by TheKeyMaster

which makes the whole thing much easier to pull off and does the job of making people think it was a gun that killed Kennedy.

Oh do tell... lets not hear your particular never before revealed fantasy about it. You realize that you wouldn't be the very first person to sway us with a fairy tale of "no gun". By chance do you also subscribe to the "no plane theory" regarding 911 and "Sandy Hook didn't happen" either?

Lemme guess...

reply to post by wtbengineer


I'm not sure how I am going to publish or display it right now but I added you as a friend and I will message you if you want to check it out. I really feel this is the answer to the riddle.. and I feel it's why people have been chasing shadows for so long.

And ironically I think they use us not being able to figure it out as justification for what they did. But that's a long story too.

Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by TheKeyMaster

 

which makes the whole thing much easier to pull off and does the job of making people think it was a gun that killed Kennedy.

Oh do tell... lets not hear your particular never before revealed fantasy about it. You realize that you wouldn't be the very first person to sway us with a fairy tale of "no gun". By chance do you also subscribe to the "no plane theory" regarding 911 and "Sandy Hook didn't happen" either?

Lemme guess...

Why would you mock someone for having a conspiracy theory on a conspiracy theory site? lol It's that whole pot and kettle thing.. Does that make you feel better about yourself?

It's funny to me you find these theories so outlandish.. you should study WWII... The British had a magician help them devise covert operations - they used the art of misdirection in their war tactics...

What better way to pull off a conspiracy than using the art of illusion?

reply to post by TheKeyMaster

It's funny to me you find these theories so outlandish.

Because well frankly, they are.

It never happened is the most outlandish. Just my opinion though you know.

you should study WWII... The British had a magician help them devise covert operations - they used the art of misdirection in their war tactics...

I have. He made germans bomb the wrong target, invented fake armies. That is all fact. Its also another topic.

Now back to what Killed Kennedy...

Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by TheKeyMaster

 

It's funny to me you find these theories so outlandish.

Because well frankly, they are.

It never happened is the most outlandish. Just my opinion though you know.

Without even having heard it? Well done...

What I have found is that truth is far far far far far far stranger than fiction. This is why so many people are oblivious to it all. I was.

reply to post by TheKeyMaster

What if the CIA had people at the scene to plant disinfo? People who were working for the CIA directing them away from the real info they are trying to hide?

Which is what exactly? Something to back that up? Or just "what if-?"

reply to post by TheKeyMaster

Without even having heard it?

Well...?

Whatever... I got some place else to be. Will check back later...

Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by TheKeyMaster

 

What if the CIA had people at the scene to plant disinfo? People who were working for the CIA directing them away from the real info they are trying to hide?

Which is what exactly? Something to back that up? Or just "what if-?"

It's just speculation. It just ties into my over all theory - how I envision that things went down.

If you are looking for hard evidence you might be looking for a long long time... these people have unlimited funds... which is how and why they didn't leave any tracks leading to them. So how else can you determine what really happened?

the chauffeur killed mr body ( JFK) w/ a specially designed gun hidden in a special compartment at point blank range - the others (not LHO - a patsy) were for plan b.

reply to post by Studenofhistory


What happened to the tapes and what was one them?

Explosive Jackie O tapes 'reveal how she believed Lyndon B Johnson killed JFK and had affair with movie star'

Jackie Onassis believed that Lyndon B Johnson and a cabal of Texas tycoons were involved in the assassination of her husband John F Kennedy, ‘explosive’ recordings are set to reveal. The secret tapes will show that the former first lady felt that her husband’s successor was at the heart of the plot to murder him.

www.dailymail.co.uk...

Has anybody considered the possibility that an expanding ( dumb dumb ) bullet was used for the head shot ??
I have seen photographs of the wound to the throat , which was a clean shot and the headshot wound was a lot more extensive .
This in itself would prove the theory of a second gunman .

Regards.