My Little Sister Took A Job With The Red Cross....

A few weeks ago my one of my little sisters sent me an email telling me that she got a job with the Red Cross. She knows that I am a socialist and she knows that I have very little respect for the big glass building type employment that she has taken in the past.

I could tell that she assumed I would think work for The Red Cross is a good thing. ( she wouldnt have left her last job unless this one offered higher pay than her last glass building job. (: ) She has told me before about when she was living in Melbourne she volunteered some of her time to work with a 'charity'. ( St Vincent De Paul ). I didnt want to hurt her feelings so I kept my opinion of 'charity' to myself.

When I read that she would be working for The Red Cross I got really worried about her right away. I sent her an email back telling her that if the job required her to travel overseas that she should not take it. I also asked if she really had to take the job.

In my opinion The Red Cross is an imperial terrorist organization. They are used to move weapons and terrorists. The Red Cross is also used to start and justify wars. It is no wonder that 'aid workers' have become a target in many nations of late. The Red Cross is worse than a Spanish jesuit.

Luckily my little sister will be safe and sound in Sydney. She told me she wont agree to travel overseas for The Red Cross. I tried to walk back my concerns a little and I congratulated her on her upward mobilty and sent her some links to 'aid workers' being targeted in certain nations. Tried to gloss over the fact that I think her employer is evil and focus on the upward mobility of a higher paying/ higher status job.

Socialists do not believe in charity and especially not church charity. There is no charity in socialism. 'Charities' are no more than capitalist apologists. A charity maintains capitalism just like a 'social democrat' does. Charity is the devil.

Any person calling themselves a socialist that believes in and supports 'charity' is nothing more than stupid leftist baby boomer spawn. They do not even understand socialism. Something like 'Affirmative Action' for example cannot be possible under socialism. Socialism is about true equality. Not sentimental bourgeois nonsense. Socialism is about solutions to problems.

If you are a socialist that believes in 'charity' then guess what? You are no socialist.

What?

There is nothing in the Spark Notes on this....

(:

Catch up.

reply to post by wemustbreakyou

Socialists do not believe in charity and especially not church charity. There is no charity in socialism. 'Charities' are no more than capitalist apologists. A charity maintains capitalism just like a 'social democrat' does. Charity is the devil.

I really feel bad for your sister........

Grant you there are things I do not like about the Red Cross, but that comment about charity is evil and socialism doesn't believe in it????, just makes it VERY hard for me to take anything you say seriously.....

Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by wemustbreakyou

 

Socialists do not believe in charity and especially not church charity. There is no charity in socialism. 'Charities' are no more than capitalist apologists. A charity maintains capitalism just like a 'social democrat' does. Charity is the devil.

I really feel bad for your sister........

Grant you there are things I do not like about the Red Cross, but that comment about charity is evil and socialism doesn't believe in it????, just makes it VERY hard for me to take anything you say seriously.....

Agreed. I won't give a dime or a moment of my time to the Red Cross, personally. It's because of specific things they've done as an organization. 9/11 money is one, and a local/regional war we fought here in my community over the use of blood from local donations are chief among them.

Having noted that, they are the ones who show up when quakes, tornadoes or hurricanes strike. FEMA sure isn't who I think comes with open arms of warm intent. At least the RC gets people into shelter and puts cups of coffee into everyone's freezing hands.

The Red Cross is an Illuminati front that masquerades as a "charity,"

The American Red Cross or the International Red Cross, like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) or the World Bank, is an Illuminati-controlled front organization whose true purpose is completely opposite from their stated purpose.

The Red Cross is a disaster racket which is in the business of making money from disasters-especially from engineered disasters.

The history is clear, the Red Cross and other large so-called charities are in actual fact front group collection agencies for the military industrial complex. Many informed historians have even alleged that the Red Cross was used as a Skull and Bones cover to overthrow The Russian Czar and pave the way for the rise of the Bolsheviks.

www.illuminati-news.com...

Now, if you add human sacrifices to the cross, you get a bloody red cross and this is really where America got their Red Cross, which is a UN Lucifer Organization. The Red Cross of today, goes to battle fields because these people view war as a form of human sacrifice, which is why we are always at war now a days.

The Red Cross wasn’t formed by some woman, during the Civil War or even in 1863 as people may think but instead the Red Cross was founded by the Illuminati in Va State, as a form of ritual slaughter in effort to have Lucifer bless the land and of course Lucifer’s blessing are really a bloody curse.

hollywoodilluminati.com...

I'm not a fan of the Red Cross either. I think their overhead is too high, for one thing, and they are, for lack of a better term, too successful. I've always also hated the United Way because of the way they get into corporations which, in turn, virtually force you to donate with payroll deduction. Ever been in the service or worked for someone like the phone company? You WILL donate, because the supervisors are graded on participation and they want 100%. In the Army, not donating could get you killed. I will say you can get by with a token amount. It's not that way everywhere. At my last workplace, circa 250 employees, they went through the motions because the organization would have stood out like a sore thumb of they did not, but there was absolutely no pressure to donate.

Even though I don't like the religious aspect, I much prefer the Salvation Army because they get out in the mean streets and put their money into charity--not salaries. They are about the only people in my area who actually FEED the homeless. I like local food banks for the same reason.

But here's a news flash. You may be a socialist, but in my experience that just means someone who wants to tell me what I can do with my life and how to live. You're not in charge of your sister's life. It doesn't matter what you think. Get over it and let her live her own way without a bunch of flack from you. It's unseemly, and when you get right down to it, it's none of your business.

I'm not a fan of the Red Cross either. I think their overhead is too high, for one thing, and they are, for lack of a better term, too successful. I've always also hated the United Way because of the way they get into corporations which, in turn, virtually force you to donate with payroll deduction. Ever been in the service or worked for someone like the phone company? You WILL donate, because the supervisors are graded on participation and they want 100%. In the Army, not donating could get you killed. I will say you can get by with a token amount. It's not that way everywhere. At my last workplace, circa 250 employees, they went through the motions because the organization would have stood out like a sore thumb of they did not, but there was absolutely no pressure to donate.

Even though I don't like the religious aspect, I much prefer the Salvation Army because they get out in the mean streets and put their money into charity--not salaries. They are about the only people in my area who actually FEED the homeless. I like local food banks for the same reason.

But here's a news flash. You may be a socialist, but in my experience that just means someone who wants to tell me what I can do with my life and how to live. You're not in charge of your sister's life. It doesn't matter what you think. Get over it and let her live her own way without a bunch of flack from you. It's unseemly, and when you get right down to it, it's none of your business.

reply to post by Murgatroid


I won't argue that! For evil to work, it is necessary for it to disguise itself as good!

However, my comment might have been more in line and precise, if perhaps I said, "Excuse me! But if I see a starving child/man/woman on the street, and I bought them some food to ease their hunger, how is that Capitalism, and ""JUST HOW IN THE HELL IS IT EVIL""!!

There is a difference between helping people out of the good of your heart, (ie charity) versus an organization that does good to earn the trust of people for nefarious reasons!

Now I might also add, that my distrust of the Red Cross is NOT to be directed to the volunteers that believe they are doing good for volunteering and actually doing good deeds. I respect ANYONE whom helps another human being from their heart.

Now that you got me on the subject, I am also against people who DONATE tons of money to an organization to get recognition!! A TRUE ACT of charity as such, should be done anonymously as to not generate ones self to be put on a pedestal!!