It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Not of this Earth" Analysis Report on Metal Samples from the 1947 UFO Crash on the Plains Of...
The samples were composed aluminum alloys, all having a low content of copper, and with unusual alloying/trace elements, many of which were unheard of as components of aluminum alloys in 1947, and are unlikely to have been introduced during the aluminum manufacturing process in that era. These facts are consistent with the material being debris from the crash of an aircraft, or spacecraft at the San Augustine desert location. If the crash did occur in 1947, the material seems inconsistent with the materials that were commercially available at that time, and are possibly too advanced to have been produced by the technology of that time period. The mechanical strength of the materials is not extraordinary, however, and seems well within the normal limits of the strength of commercially available aluminum alloys. The materials could all be bent, torn, and cut with relative ease. It is not known where these samples came from in the structure of the craft, however, and it is possible that they came from interior structures, which did not require extreme mechanical strength. If this is the case, then samples from the exterior of the craft may show much more mechanical strength and toughness. The layer of ceramic-like material, seen on some of the samples (W-2, W-3, and W-6) under ligh
Other Tests Performed
Samples W-1 and W-6 were placed on a flat surface, and a pendulum, constructed from a 4 oz lead weight tied to an 18” long piece of monofilament nylon line was passed over the samples. When the weight passed over the samples at close range (< 2”) the weight consistently showed a noticeable deflection away from the sample.
These results are similar to those obtained from a similar test done on all six samples by Chuck Wade at the 2010 UFO Congress, in Laughlin, NV.
Originally posted by RooskiZombi
reply to post by meteorlima
This thread....Doesnt seem to... Have a point...Can you please...Explain your post with an opinion or evaluation
Originally posted by RooskiZombi
reply to post by meteorlima
This thread....Doesnt seem to... Have a point...Can you please...Explain your post with an opinion or evaluation
Chuck Wade and a crew excavated the material,but he doesn't say when,and I highly doubt it was done immediately after the crash in 1947.
Originally posted by intrptr
Other Tests Performed
Samples W-1 and W-6 were placed on a flat surface, and a pendulum, constructed from a 4 oz lead weight tied to an 18” long piece of monofilament nylon line was passed over the samples. When the weight passed over the samples at close range (< 2”) the weight consistently showed a noticeable deflection away from the sample.
This is about Art Campbell who became interested in a second ufo crash mentioned in the Philip Corso book "Day after Roswell" while on vacation driving thru the southwest and decided to look for the crash site which took several years and narrowed the search to a small area located on private land on the Plains of San Augustine,N.M ,with permission from the land owner Art did recover many artifacts.Chuck Wade whose dad owned "Wade's Bar" in Corona where Mac Brazel stopped tell Chuck's dad "Jesse" about the debris field at the Foster ranch had attended the Aztec UFO Symposium where Art was telling his story and they teamed up to return to the crash site where "artifacts" were recovered in 2004. Those metal samples were analyzed back then but the critical "isotope ratio" test to determine it extraterrestrial was not performed until this report by Steve Colbern who agree's more testing is needed to verify the findings thus far.
Originally posted by RooskiZombi
reply to post by meteorlima
This thread....Doesnt seem to... Have a point...Can you please...Explain your post with an opinion or evaluation
Highly suspicious that they didn't confirm these results with another piece of test equipment - like dowsing rods, for example.