It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by CornShucker
I've advise many over the years to do due diligence before choosing a counselor for their kids...
What you say is correct, and her point is a valid one. I've remarked earlier in the thread that Counselors and Psychiatrists CAN BE DAMAGING.
I left the field entirely after discovering two things:
First, as a practitioner, my empathy and compassion levels were unsuitable, and I was UNABLE to remain distant and disinterested. I could not leave it at work. My heart was breaking for these people's suffering, and it drained me too much - to the point that I was 'unavailable' emotionally to nurture my own family.
Second, as an insider, I was privy to the real agendas of the executive directors, the funding agencies, the duplicity of many people in the field, and the FACT that MANY counselors DO NOT HAVE THEIR * TOGETHER. Many, in fact, are quite damaged themselves. It's my opinion that many of those who do go into the field, do so to PURGE THEIR OWN SUFFERING. Same with religious leaders? You bet.
So, I got out. Said, "I will not continue this." The worst part was how they wanted to insist that outside of the clinical setting, we were "not allowed" to have relationships with the client. Not allowed to accept small gifts like home-made treats or craft art, for example, and were expected to simply SEVER the relationship entirely, with no after-care or follow-up contact permitted at all once the treatment had resolved. So, you get close to someone who is sharing intimate thoughts and secrets with you, to work hard to help them establish goals and to explore options, to make suggestions and help them think it through - and then POOF, you're gone! Forever!
That is crap! That is not humanitarian compassion and trust-building. Neither is preaching hellfire and absolute obedience, or insisting that very questionable ideas are true, or that every human being sucks and deserves to go to hell! If any 'helper' sees the 'client' as DEFECTIVE, STUPID, and UNABLE TO MAKE DECISIONS - therefore needing utter control, they are NOT real helpers. They're control freaks.
edit on 29-3-2013 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by CornShucker
So, I got out. Said, "I will not continue this." The worst part was how they wanted to insist that outside of the clinical setting, we were "not allowed" to have relationships with the client. Not allowed to accept small gifts like home-made treats or craft art, for example, and were expected to simply SEVER the relationship entirely, with no after-care or follow-up contact permitted at all once the treatment had resolved. So, you get close to someone who is sharing intimate thoughts and secrets with you, to work hard to help them establish goals and to explore options, to make suggestions and help them think it through - and then POOF, you're gone! Forever!
That is crap! That is not humanitarian compassion and trust-building. Neither is preaching hellfire and absolute obedience, or insisting that very questionable ideas are true, or that every human being sucks and deserves to go to hell! If any 'helper' sees the 'client' as DEFECTIVE, STUPID, and UNABLE TO MAKE DECISIONS - therefore needing utter control, they are NOT real helpers. They're control freaks.
edit on 29-3-2013 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)
What will happen? If a person knows the difference between right and wrong, there's no question of 'standing by the same belief'. Yes, there would be enough motivation/ integrity.
But, I realize I have not lived in the
culture or country where you live, and
maybe the conditions there do
overcome the impulse/motivation to
NOT HARM another....which could lead
to violence, where I am addressing the issue as it plays out in the USA.
If this does become an object of agreement with the APA, does OP accept the reality that some rogue physicians could use this diagnostic category to perpetrate an abuse against a patient, perhaps even for animosity toward the patient's religion?
I agree that some belief systems are wrong and imposing but it seems to me that you are against any belief where God is active. You want people to be good without conciousness of God.
I hope i am wrong about this.
I am glad you are no longer a practicing counsellor because with your angry attitude - you would harm the patients. I have watched this thread from the beginning and you attacked the first poster and have attacked many others also. Your OP implied that you were ready for a fight. You are on the defensive all the time - how does that work for you?
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by Itisnowagain
I am glad you are no longer a practicing counsellor because with your angry attitude - you would harm the patients. I have watched this thread from the beginning and you attacked the first poster and have attacked many others also. Your OP implied that you were ready for a fight. You are on the defensive all the time - how does that work for you?
I never harmed a patient. YOU LOT are not my CLIENTS.
I stand up for what I believe is right, and yes, I will fight for it.
I am on the defensive from ONLY THE PEOPLE I would would take offense at the OP, and ONLY ON THIS SUBJECT and a handful of other bigoted, hate-filled hypocrisy parading around as "good."
Common sense.
When a person's head is full of terror because they fear some future eternal torment that someone else has imposed upon them -- when they are controlled by that fear, as well as being told they are worthless and deserving of it, they have a serious problem behaving in a healthy way.
If the 'treatment was resolved' why do you feel that 'you' still wanted contact? It sounds as though you wanted to take them home and keep them - as a friend..
Originally posted by wildtimes
I stand up for what I believe is right, and yes, I will fight for it.
I am on the defensive from ONLY THE PEOPLE I would would take offense at the OP, and ONLY ON THIS SUBJECT and a handful of other bigoted, hate-filled hypocrisy parading around as "good."
Common sense.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by Itisnowagain
Yeah, so?
You can see my attitude because I make it clear that I KNOW the type of religious indoctrination we are discussing IN THIS THREAD can be damaging. I've seen the damage from many angles, and I don't care if it pisses 'you lot' off - I AM angry at the Evangelical browbeating.
See how you all are treating me? I'm supposed to just "take it"? Why, because 'you lot' are Christian extremists and don't want to be called out or to be SHOWN what you are doing to people?
I don't see anyone thanking the people who have come forward to address their own personal struggles - and there have been more of them in this thread than there are of 'you lot.' You simply don't have a sound leg to stand on.
Why are you not going after them and telling them they are wrong about what happened TO THEM?
You're kinda mentally disturbed I can see .
I am not a 'Christian extremist'. But I am included in 'you lot'.
I have never been in any religion but I still would not like to see 'religious books' burned.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by Anusuia
You're kinda mentally disturbed I can see .
No, I'm FLAT OUT ANGRY about the things those churches are doing to people's self-worth, shaming and scaring them. Now you've again insulted me, and claim that I'm a nutter. What is that supposed to accomplish?
The truth is that I see something wrong, and I'm not willing to just shut up about it.
If you can't see that, then no doubt discussion with you IS a total waste of time.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by Itisnowagain
I am not a 'Christian extremist'. But I am included in 'you lot'.
I have never been in any religion but I still would not like to see 'religious books' burned.
You're NOT included in 'you lot' if you are not a Christian extremist, and clearly you are choosing to attack ME rather than explaining your own position.
You're the one who comes into these discussions making high-brow Buddhist-type "there is only the present moment" stuff, and I have repeatedly told you I understood what you were talking about! Your criticism here is a non sequitor.
I've never said anything about burning 'religious books.' Ever. EVER.edit on 30-3-2013 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by Itisnowagain
I've often wondered what was "up" with you.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by Itisnowagain
I have redacted 'you lot' from my post addressing you. I apologize for assuming that you were simply gang-bashing me with those few here who don't like what I'm saying.