Michael Savage Calls 9/11 Truther "Jew Hater" For Simply Mentioning 911 Was An Inside Job

It's a technique. Amy Goodman, a Jewish American, explains how it works

first thing i thought of when i read this..From Weiner to Savage.

Inside jobbers = serious mental issues with no respect for victims families.

It's akin to denying the Holocaust.

Originally posted by Miracula
Inside jobbers = serious mental issues with no respect for victims families.

It's akin to denying the Holocaust.

Or you could say, great respect for the victims, because they are determined to go to the bottom of it. Dissent is the greatest form of patriotism.

Disposing of viable intelligence about an imminent attack and letting it happen, makes one an accessory. Too many facts that do not add up. Time will tell.

Calling someone else a hater because (s)he doesn't agree with your views is, in turn, hateful.

reply to post by Corruption Exposed


Nah. Don't feel bad about having negative vibes for this dude. That's what he does. He peddles AM anger porn.

Savage is a paid hater. It doesn't matter whom or what. What have you got? He'll spit and foam into the mic just like any other overzealous spin-doctor. His ranting resembles that of a grand wizard, just using different vocabulary. He is not anti-bipartisan. He is pro-establishment. He's like Limbaugh after-dark.

The only thing that can be done about these types is simply ignoring them. If no one listens to the smut merchants then they are only crazy people screaming in a soundproof booth.

I know. Lets all wake up to the voice of rage and jump into rush hour traffic to start the day. Why bother spending an evening in a quiet house or working the night shift in stoic silence when one can tune in to regularly scheduled statist brainwashing? Douche-baggery I say.

Radio could be so cool. But no, we get beer jingles, sammy hagar, and a-holes like mike savage.

Originally posted by starfoxxx
The only person I can see here polluting minds is the OP... There is no real evidence 9/11 was an inside job done by the government.. The number of people needed to keep the whole thing under cover without something or someone breaking even up's the amount of disbelief... OP is just looking to pollute WITH his own waste, no better then the man he is trying to 'clean up'. Do you clean up pollution with more pollution? DISBELIEF

edit on 25-3-2013 by starfoxxx because: (no reason given)

I read you response in disbelief. There may not be direct evidence of who did it, but there is direct evidence of the buildings being demolished by thermite explosives not the airplanes that hit it. This alone proves that some dark forces were involved. If not who you deny it to be, then who would have the power and resources? Read the facts instead of what the nightly news has fed you. ***unless you are a paid shill***

Originally posted by Miracula
Inside jobbers = serious mental issues with no respect for victims families.

It's akin to denying the Holocaust.

Not even close. Your math does not equate. We can feel for the families while realizing, unfoolishly, that buildings on fire don't perfectly implode into their own footprint at free fall speed.

go collect your check.

Originally posted by Turkenstein
but there is direct evidence of the buildings being demolished by thermite explosives

Except thermite is not a explosive, and there is no evidence whatsoever thermite was used....

This alone proves that some dark forces were involved.

No, it proves you have no clue at all what happend on 9/11

that buildings on fire don't perfectly implode into their own footprint at free fall speed.

None of the buildings fell into their own footprint - just look at the damage they caused to surrounding buildings....

WTC 7 is the only building that free fell for a short time (due to it being built over a substation) - just watch the collapse of WTC 1 & 2 and you will see the debris falling at free fall speed falling much faster than the building was collapsing.

Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
Here is another example of the media whores saying whatever possible to discredit anything or anyone that stands against the official story of 911. Michael Savage, who I have never heard of before today as I am not much of a fan of MSM radio shows, was live on air discussing the NK crisis and around two minutes into the video a caller dials in and discusses the original topic of the NK crisis but the conversation eventually evolves into a discussion about 911.

As soon as the caller mentions his opinion that 911 was an inside job Savage automatically says "Oh you're one of those guys" then goes off on a sarcastic rant about how "the Zionsits did it" when the caller did not even mention Zionism or Jews, yet Savage proceeds to call the caller a "Jew Hater".

If you don't know who Savage is, here is a little bit of information on him before I share the video:

Michael Savage (born Michael Alan Weiner; March 31, 1942) is a conservative American radio host, author and political commentator. He is the host of The Savage Nation, a nationally syndicated talk show that aired on Talk Radio Network across the United States. The Savage Nation had an audience of 8 to 10 million listeners on 400 stations across the United States, making it the second most listened-to radio talk show in the country.[2][3] Beginning October 23, 2012, after several weeks off the air, Michael Savage returned through a new syndicator, Cumulus Media Networks. He holds master's degrees from the University of Hawaii in medical botany and medical anthropology and a Ph.D. from the University of California, Berkeley, in nutritional ethnomedicine. As Michael Weiner, he has written books on herbal medicine and homeopathy; as Michael Savage, he has written four political books that have reached the New York Times Best Seller List.[4][5][6][7]

en.wikipedia.org...(commentator)

The caller calls in at about the two minute mark of the video if you are in a hurry:

Personally I believe 911 was an inside job and that it was ochestrated by shadow elements of the US and Israeli governents. I know this has been discuss a lot on ATS so I am not here to dispute the facts of 911 or change anyone's mind but my goal here is to point out the media's complicity in discrediting anyone who questions the official story of 911 and any other "conspiracy" topic. They even resort to name calling and off topic deflections in the form of ad-hom attacks among many other tactics. Total censorship is another tactic that they use when it comes to questioning the official story of "taboo" subjects that indicate how evil our elected officials really are.

Michael Savage resorted to the oldest trick in the book that Zionists use, even though the caller did not mention Zionism or Israel he pulled out the "Jew Hater" card. I hate having to post this video over and over but it does showcase their desperation and they always turn to this "trick" as a last resort.

As long as we have programmed puppets like Michael Savage who are willing pollute the minds of radio listeners with their lies and deceit (he has up to 10 million listeners per show) we need to continue to try and spread what we consider to be the truth to counter the liar's lies because the sad reality is that there are people who take what people like him say seriously.

I found his actions on this particular radio broadcast to be rather desperate and pathetic but since I believe in free speech I respect his right to express his opinions no matter how Jaded they might be.

Originally posted by Miracula
Inside jobbers = serious mental issues with no respect for victims families.

It's akin to denying the Holocaust.

I reported your post to the mods but since they took no action I will respond accordingly.

Official story believers = serious mental issues with no respect for victims families.

It's akin to believing the official story of the holocaust.

Both "official stories" have more holes than swiss cheese and stink even more.

The holocaust happened, but why is it so taboo to question certain inconsistencies?

The same goes for 911, why is it so wrong to question obvious errors in the official story?

What are your thoughts on Mr. Savages behavior?

I know on this forum that the following position is not going to be a popular one, however, here it is:

There has been no solid proof presented that 911 was in "inside job". In fact, most of the "proof" I have seen has been obvious bunk, easily de-bunked.

The problem with a conspiracy of this magnitude is that there would always be someone who would blow the whistle. The problem with most conspiracies is that in order to make them work there would be so many people involved that keeping a secret would be virtually impossible.

The most damning theory would be that the admin just decided to do nothing, allowing it to happen, but even that has it's thorns.

That'll be quite enough, people...

The name calling, and assorted other antics will cease. Attempting to insight intemperate responses will stop. Replying to those sorts of comments will stop.

Discuss the issue, or don't post.

Opinions on Savage's remarks OK. Opinions about Savage himself, provided they're within T and C OK.

Opinions about other members? Most definitely not OK.

You've all been warned.

reply to post by hellobruce

Except thermite is not a explosive, and there is no evidence whatsoever thermite was used....

Here is a peer reviewed study that proves thermite was used, now debunk it...

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

No, it proves you have no clue at all what happend on 9/11

Please elaborate, empty statements such as yours have no significance without evidence to support them so please enlighten us.

None of the buildings fell into their own footprint - just look at the damage they caused to surrounding buildings....

Yes, they fell into their footprint at next to free fall speed. Damage to surrounding buildings also happens in other controlled demolitions, and never have buildings such as the Twin Towers been demolished so the effects would have been unpredictable therefore you have absolutely nothing to base your assumptions on.

WTC 7 is the only building that free fell for a short time (due to it being built over a substation) - just watch the collapse of WTC 1 & 2 and you will see the debris falling at free fall speed falling much faster than the building was collapsing.

WTC 7 wasn't hit by a plane and closer buildings stayed standing...explain that one.

It's Micheal Savage, what are you expecting? This is the guy who told a man to go get aids and die after he confessed to being gay. He's not known for being polite. He's basically a neo-con shock jock.

The statement is absurd but I expect no less from his kind. The frightening thing is a very large segment of the population actually believes the man is an astute political analyst.

Originally posted by Turkenstein

I read you response in disbelief. There may not be direct evidence of who did it, but there is direct evidence of the buildings being demolished by thermite explosives not the airplanes that hit it. This alone proves that some dark forces were involved. If not who you deny it to be, then who would have the power and resources? Read the facts instead of what the nightly news has fed you. ***unless you are a paid shill***

The facts? The facts that constantly shift as the are de-bunked? I followed the "911 truther" theories for a while, until I realized how just how screwed up and, in some cases, deceitful the arguments were.

The most damning of those were the pictures that were presented of the Pentagon, showing no debris from a plane, with the claim that it was a cruise missile. Turns out that the pics in question were taken from such an angle, with a small hill obscuring the debris, very cleverly taken from just such an angle as to hide the debris. This pretty much cinched it for me. An obvious attempt by truthers to deceive.

No doubt someone will claim this was a clever move by the CIA to add disinformation and misinformation damaging their cause....if so then this was jumped on and accepted by virtually every "truther" website in existence at the time.

So...in my humble opinion, it's all bunk. So much of the truthers claims have been de-bunked by science or by obvious logic and so many claims have been proven to be nothing but bold attempts at deceiving that i can no longer believe that truther claims contain any shred of real evidence.

Your response to that will no doubt be that I too am a "paid shill"....how convenient for you. Anyone who disagrees with you are obviously paid shills.

reply to post by bbracken677


I wouldn't call you a shill. I tend to always say "I don't know", because I really don't know how I feel. There are some things about the OS that don't add up, but some things that are pushed by people around here are just...they don't make sense to me.

I think the problem here is people like Savage who immediately jump to antisemitism accusations and rude comments when someone dares to think something they "aren't allowed to".

reply to post by SheopleNation


Yeah, I mean he is definitely a good speaker, he hooked me in for a couple weeks, but during the election season it became too much to handle and I stopped listening. He definitely said some things I liked (when he was talking about the things he disagreed with), but lost me when he started talking about the things he DID support in a lot of cases. I feel like I should give a more thorough answer since you replied with so much, but I'm on my phone, so a star will have to do.

Originally posted by Miracula
Inside jobbers = serious mental issues with no respect for victims families.

It's akin to denying the Holocaust.

It is more disrespectful to not demand a real investigation into what happened. Something that the families of the victims are demanding. And take the holocaust bull somewhere else.

reply to post by bbracken677

There has been no solid proof presented that 911 was in "inside job". In fact, most of the "proof" I have seen has been obvious bunk, easily de-bunked.

Sorry but you can't debunk gravity and physics. Not to mention all the people that were there and heard explosions before and after the plane hit.