Grace be unto you, and peace, from him which is, and which was, and which is to come
...when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is
Ignore the quotes. It is what is in them that we will use.
Lets talk about what "is, was, and is to come" means. Or what "was, is not, and yet is" means. Why should we? Since it holds the truth to whether
we've always existed or started existing.
Existences are basic communications that mean they are present.
Present communications are nonetheless basic activities. And it is even if not intended activities by the existences.
Check out this definition:
pre·sent
1. give something: to give or hand something to somebody, often in a humorously formal manner
Well, existences give communication to one another that they are there by their simple presence.
Now check out this definition using the same spelling:
pres·ent
1. A moment or period in time perceptible as intermediate between past and future; now.
By this definition, the past to existences are deaths of their former present which follow them.
The future is not, but if the present remains, and the existences somehow hold knowledge it will, then existences can set things they will do for a
later present they know is to come, and call it their future before it is done by them.
How long has the present been going on for? The present can not exist unless there are forms of awarenesses.
To be an
is not means you are but not something you once was, even though you will return to proceed that something you once was when you will
be your
yet is after your
is not. Like the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
The last question is this: How long back does that
was being something go before it got into that
is not? Ever?
If you noticed the bible keeps using the phrase "for ever and ever." What is the "and" implying between? Is it impying the present between the past
and the future is FOR remaining, as to mean to tell us that the present is awarenesses themselves in what they actually are?
For ever and ever might be another way of meaning for past and future, which the present, seeing how it is actual awarenesses between, remains all for
being.
Or:
Could existences have formerly back as far as ever been in their full grace and glory with activities in some other format before putting those same
activities into what would be their spin-offs? Could one "ever" in "for ever and ever" be one now past format of activity while the second "ever" is
the other now present and maybe furture format of activities?
In the book of Daniel there is mention of a conspiracy type thinking to change times and laws. If the first ever represents a way of times and laws,
then the second ever represents a great change to those things. This would mean we always were existing, basically, just in another format of
activity.
There are people who wonder why they didnt just start off in paradise. Well maybe they've always been in paradise, previously under a former way of
activity of a grace and glory till put here, to get an understanding of how paradise shall proceed CHANGED for and even further exceeding great way.
I take it that the existences are not FOR ever, they are FOR ever and ever. Meaning, FOR being changed, to greatly exceed the former times and laws of
their existences together.
edit on 24-3-2013 by WarJohn because: (no reason given)