It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ~widowmaker~
reply to post by beezzer
lies all lies, its some stupid fashion award on a cover of a magazine.
...and Kim-jon-il had a unicorn ,knew each and everyone's name that lived in in north korea ,graduated on every notable graduation there is, was in direct contact with the creator and .. !!11 .....
Originally posted by galacticgirl
reply to post by beezzer
I'm not upset - just taking a deep breath and feeling the animosity sent toward the First Lady. She grows organic vegetables, promotes good health and exercise. Really good reasons to condemn and cast aspersions at her.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by ~widowmaker~
reply to post by beezzer
lies all lies, its some stupid fashion award on a cover of a magazine.
We know. But depicted wearing a crown? What kind of message is that sending?
Does the magazine consider her royalty?
Or does she consider herself royalty?
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
beezer, come on. Why would you say "does she consider herself royalty?" when she has nothing to do with this conceptual "art" piece?
Do you honestly believe the magazine considers her royalty?
Have you never seen other depictions like this?
This is really silly and another excuse to attack her...she has NOTHING to do with this...
CJ
CJ
Originally posted by Jadette
And this is what stands for 'breaking political news' these days? Come on folks, this is ATS, lift the bar a bit.
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by beezzer
Oh my. Do you typically follow the fashion magaizines? Now truly they are paragons for making important statements (not).
CJ
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
Originally posted by CaticusMaximus
Originally posted by beezzer
Disgusting.
All I have to say about that.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by ColoradoJens
The magazines I enjoy usually have you colouring within the lines.
But thanks all the same.
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by ColoradoJens
The magazines I enjoy usually have you colouring within the lines.
But thanks all the same.
Beezer, step back. Admit this is stretching it. There is no conspiracy. You don't like her and some lame brained fashion editors picked her for their "fashion royalty" spread. That's it.
"Highlights" is a good choice for coloring within the lines.
CJ
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by ColoradoJens
The magazines I enjoy usually have you colouring within the lines.
But thanks all the same.
Beezer, step back. Admit this is stretching it. There is no conspiracy. You don't like her and some lame brained fashion editors picked her for their "fashion royalty" spread. That's it.
"Highlights" is a good choice for coloring within the lines.
CJ
Tell you what.
I did a search and could find no other first lady depicted as a queen with a crown.
You find another fashion mag that had a past first lady depicted in a similar fashion and I will concede the point.
Fair?
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
Please, don't make me do that. Are you just torturing me?
CJ