Guns guns and guns

I honestly think the us government is losing it's mind
If they want to ban guns they can easily do this using their current laws or rectify UN laws which does not need congressional approval

I think that they want US to get guns. it's like telling a little kid that he cannot have candy within the next couple of weeks / months.

what happens is that everyone get guns and ammo. people are searching the internet for ammo and drive some miles to buy them.

I put this in US political Madness because it does not make sense coming with all these nice statements where the government will take a way your guns.

i almost feel that they want us to get weapons for some kind or threat that is coming towards us
No no Nubiru!! or will it???

it looks more and more that they will create a tax globally for protection against asteroids or meteorites which could be hinting towards operation blue beam.

regardless as a good citizen i have done exactly what they asked me to do and got some shotguns and 9 mm.
all officially acquired through my local gun dealer....

(imo) Nubiru and guns are a bad combination. That's why they're pushing hard for mental health back ground checks

reply to post by canucks555


yes could be but everyone can be considered to be nuts!!
all depends on how to classify it

reply to post by cayote


I've had this conversation with a few of my friends. While the possiblity is there for the ol' reverse psychology ploy . . . I have to believe based on the history of the agenda being pushed and the methods used that is not the case here.

I really think this is more of a case to make us fall in with the rest of the world, so the Collectivist agenda to subjugate the world and destroy Individualism is carried out.

Liberal policies always backfire. Always. They don't see unintended consequences.

The funny thing with guns is that people who are normally conservative in their views can be basically made to almost empty their accounts at the first mention of the dreaded words of "gun grab" since most of them will buy more guns to show 'the man' but at the same time forgetting they're giving the man loads of money in taxes by buying said guns so they can work quicker to do you over time, now how to work out the paradox it creates that buying guns helps the enemy but at the same time protects you from him is a good question

Originally posted by jimmiec
Liberal policies always backfire. Always. They don't see unintended consequences.

There is nothing liberal about prohibition . . . Too many "liberals" in this country fall for the myth the anyone in the Democratic party is "liberal" or that their platform/policies are.

I think they did it on purpose as well OP. The way I see it, (Most people would prolly disagree) What better way to arm your citizens than to use some scare tactics (Heck I picked up a Rugger .40 and Mossberg 590) just in case someone came knockin that should be at the door. WHY? Why use scare tactics and arm the citizens? Obviously something is aloof~ that's for sure.

In regards to the state of the union and the rest of the world for that matter, it seems like WW3 could kick off by a mouse farting on the other side of the globe. So what would the US do? Deploy the troops!!! Then who's at home to protect our homeland???? WE ARE~~!!!

Meh~ Whatever happens, happens..... Hopefully it will just be an Atomic Bomb... Short and sweet... If we loose or whatever occurs, let it be swift~ And if we find ourselves with the upper hand, let the fire fly~ ^_^

reply to post by cayote


Gun control has nothing to do with a political label!

It has to do with minions or useful idiots being used to usher in the NWO!

The rest of the world better pray to whatever GOD they choose to worship, because if they succeed in taking away guns from lawful gun owners in the US, ya'll might as well kiss your asses good bye!

reply to post by seeker1963


the point is that by telling people we will take away your guns will just make sure people get more guns and potentially hide them, like what has been done in Australia.

reply to post by cayote

i almost feel that they want us to get weapons for some kind or threat that is coming towards us No no Nubiru!! or will it???

Are we supposed to shoot at Nubiru??

I was going to take a picture but….OK!

I hope it doesn’t come down in NY because I hear they can’t have hi-capacity magazines up there!

Originally posted by cayote

I think that they want US to get guns. it's like telling a little kid that he cannot have candy within the next couple of weeks / months.

i almost feel that they want us to get weapons for some kind or threat that is coming towards us
No no Nubiru!! or will it???

I would consider that there are covert methods being used to get the 'patriot' type armed to the teeth, meanwhile they label those patriots as 'home grown terrorists'... Then, they covertly 'initiate' those patriot types into using those weapons.

In this manner they have a controlled revolution. The 'rebels' will be labeled terrorists and 'conspiracy nuts' by mainstream media, most americans likely too busy with their financial situations, job situations and increasingly difficult way of life to truely and rationally investigate the situation beyond the propaganda.

I would say this plan can only work if their planned 'patriotic rebels' are armed and willing to fire the first shot against them, that way the corrupt factions within the government can spin it to their benefit.

I have had the same idea.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by Mr Tranny


the third amendment to bear arms- was put in place- for a present// future// because of the Fahisim and Monarchy- for the people to be able to defend them selves against- their government or other countries- -- at that time- the 13 colonies where rebels against their own government-

but these new ideas about guns i have no idea-