Big Week for NWO - RFID goes Live March 23rd

Voluntary Non-Compliance is a good term to memorize. March 23rd will come and go. This law will not pass before it accomplishes what they have designed it to accomplish. As your money fails, they saviors will come in with a solution.

Here are some helpful websites to assist you as you are chipped and tracked. Don't miss all the fees associated with chipping and regulations. Also, make sure you note the fact that they emit radiation. This part is regulated as well. These chips will not just go into your body, they will go into your food, drug and all commerce related packaging.

RegisterCorp.com

National Medical Device Registry

BREF Medical Registry



What the medical industry thinks:

Layered deep within the bill itself, however, is an important issue that is infrequently discussed. HR 3590 dramatically changes the relationship between the U.S. government and the medical device industry.

A basic understanding of these policy shifts is critical for the practicing orthopaedic surgeon because they will, in turn, affect physician-industry relationships. This article briefly discusses five key issues regarding HR 3200 and medical devices.

SEC. 2561. NATIONAL MEDICAL DEVICE REGISTRY.

(a) Registry-

(1) IN GENERAL- Section 519 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i) is amended--

(A) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and

(B) by inserting after subsection (f) the following: 'National Medical Device Registry

‘(g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that--

‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and

‘(B) is--

‘(i) a class III device; or

‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.

‘(2) In developing the registry, the Secretary shall, in consultation with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, determine the best methods for--

‘(A) including in the registry, in a manner consistent with subsection (f), appropriate information to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by type, model, and serial number or other unique identifier;

‘(B) validating methods for analyzing patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and for linking such data with the information included in the registry as described in subparagraph (A), including, to the extent feasible, use of--

‘(i) data provided to the Secretary under other provisions of this chapter; and

‘(ii) information from public and private sources identified under paragraph (3);

‘(C) integrating the activities described in this subsection with--

‘(i) activities under paragraph (3) of section 505(k) (relating to active postmarket risk identification);

‘(ii) activities under paragraph (4) of section 505(k) (relating to advanced analysis of drug safety data); and

‘(iii) other postmarket device surveillance activities of the Secretary authorized by this chapter; and

‘(D) providing public access to the data and analysis collected or developed through the registry in a manner and form that protects patient privacy and proprietary information and is comprehensive, useful, and not misleading to patients, physicians, and scientists.

‘(3)(A) To facilitate analyses of postmarket safety and patient outcomes for devices described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall, in collaboration with public, academic, and private entities, develop methods to--

‘(i) obtain access to disparate sources of patient safety and outcomes data, including--

‘(I) Federal health-related electronic data (such as data from the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act or from the health systems of the Department of Veterans Affairs);

‘(II) private sector health-related electronic data (such as pharmaceutical purchase data and health insurance claims data); and

‘(III) other data as the Secretary deems necessary to permit postmarket assessment of device safety and effectiveness; and

‘(ii) link data obtained under clause (i) with information in the registry.

‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘data’ refers to information respecting a device described in paragraph (1), including claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.

‘(4) Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall promulgate regulations for establishment and operation of the registry under paragraph (1). Such regulations--

‘(A)(i) in the case of devices that are described in paragraph (1) and sold on or after the date of the enactment of this subsection, shall require manufacturers of such devices to submit information to the registry, including, for each such device, the type, model, and serial number or, if required under subsection (f), other unique device identifier; and

‘(ii) in the case of devices that are described in paragraph (1) and sold before such date, may require manufacturers of such devices to submit such information to the registry, if deemed necessary by the Secretary to protect the public health;

‘(B) shall establish procedures--

‘(i) to permit linkage of information submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A) with patient safety and outcomes data obtained under paragraph (3); and

‘(ii) to permit analyses of linked data;

‘(C) may require device manufacturers to submit such other information as is necessary to facilitate postmarket assessments of device safety and effectiveness and notification of device risks;

‘(D) shall establish requirements for regular and timely reports to the Secretary, which shall be included in the registry, concerning adverse event trends, adverse event patterns, incidence and prevalence of adverse events, and other information the Secretary determines appropriate, which may include data on comparative safety and outcomes trends; and

‘(E) shall establish procedures to permit public access to the information in the registry in a manner and form that protects patient privacy and proprietary information and is comprehensive, useful, and not misleading to patients, physicians, and scientists.

‘(5) To carry out this subsection, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for fiscal years 2010 and 2011.’.

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE- The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish and begin implementation of the registry under section 519(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by paragraph (1), by not later than the date that is 36 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, without regard to whether or not final regulations to establish and operate the registry have been promulgated by such date.

(3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- Section 303(f)(1)(B)(ii) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 333(f)(1)(B)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘519(g)’ and inserting ‘519(h)’.

(b) Electronic Exchange and Use in Certified Electronic Health Records of Unique Device Identifiers-

(1) RECOMMENDATION - The HIT Policy Committee established under section 3002 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300jj-12) shall recommend to the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for the electronic exchange and use in certified electronic health records of a unique device identifier for each device described in section 519(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by subsection (a).

(2) STANDARDS, IMPLEMENTATION CRITERIA, AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA- The Secretary of the Health Human Services, acting through the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, shall adopt standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for the electronic exchange and use in certified electronic health records of a unique device identifier for each device described in paragraph (1), if such an identifier is required by section 519(f) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i(f)) for the device.

LINK

Ron Paul

Republican Congressman Ron Paul from Texas, states on his
website:
"Buried deep within the over 1,000 pages of the massive US Health Care
Bill (PDF) in a “non-discussed” section titled: Subtitle C-11 Sec. 2521—
National Medical Device Registry, and which states its purpose as........ He
quotes that part of the law and then goes on to say: "In “real world speak”,
according to this report, this new law, when fully implemented, provides the
framework for making the United States the first Nation in the World to
require each and every one of its citizens to have implanted in them a
radio-frequency identification microchip for the purpose of controlling who
is, or isn’t, allowed medical care in their country".
[url=http://www.catholicintl.com/index.php/latest-news/897-obamacare-madates-rfid-chip-implant-for-every-us-citizen-by-march-2013?format=pdf]LINK[/url ]

This has nothing to do with putting RFID chips into anyones body, but it regulates that the manufacturers of devices that are meant to be implanted into human bodies ( like prostheses, artificial joints, pacemakers, etc ) have to register such devices in a central database in order to start collecting data about their safety and so on.
On top of that it says that all collected data will be accessible by the public and private research organizations to improve the safety of such devices. I am surprised that no national registry of such devices exists already, apparently there are different standards in place per state right now.

But maybe I missed the relevant part ?

reply to post by EnochWasRight
And people think that the feds trying to curb our second amendment rights or an economic collapse is what will end up causing a civil war! I would say that trying to force people into allowing them to implant ANY kind of foreign device into their bodies is when the real uprising will begin! I hope they have enough space in their FEMA camps/indoctrination centers for at least half of the citizens of the US if they try it because that dog ain't gonna hunt!

reply to post by EnochWasRight


Educate yourself into the exact nature of rfid class iii semi-passive biobond. Your new RFID includes some amazing technologies. LINK You can even get your credit report included on the chip. So many uses on such a tiny chip. With a range of 100 meters and increasing, this chip is a wonder of NWO development.

Our VeriMed system, which includes our VeriChip, is designed to rapidly and accurately identify people who are unconscious, confused or unable to communicate at the time of medical treatment, for example, upon arrival at a hospital emergency room. The VeriChip is a passive RFID microchip, approximately the size of a grain of rice, which is implanted under the skin in a patient’s upper right arm under the supervision of a physician. The capsule is coated with a polymer, BioBond TM to form adherence to human tissue, thereby preventing migration in the body. Each microchip contains a unique 16-digit identification number. With that identification number, emergency room personnel or EMTs can securely obtain from our or a third party’s database the patient’s pre-approved information, including the patient’s name, primary care physician, emergency contact information, advance directives and, if the patient elects, other pertinent data, such as personal health records. We have not actively marketed the VeriMed system since early 2008.

reply to post by EnochWasRight


I am seriously thinking of dropping this website due to the sensationalism and fear mongering that just overshadows all the great posts. No matter the headline, one of you will try to turn it in to something it is not. I say to you.

I am starting to think, by what I have seen, Enoch was anything but right. I think he was educated by a more advanced northern civilization that had flight capabilities and he never saw any aliens. They say advanced misunderstood technologies will always be perceived as magic. j.s.

Really? A quick search of GOOGLE: USE THIS LINK... tells another story. Check my post above on the recent report to the commerce commission. They have big plans for this technology. We are one law away from requiring this in every human on Earth. Obamacare was just a start.

Originally posted by H1ght3chHippie
This has nothing to do with putting RFID chips into anyones body, but it regulates that the manufacturers of devices that are meant to be implanted into human bodies ( like prostheses, artificial joints, pacemakers, etc ) have to register such devices in a central database in order to start collecting data about their safety and so on.
On top of that it says that all collected data will be accessible by the public and private research organizations to improve the safety of such devices. I am surprised that no national registry of such devices exists already, apparently there are different standards in place per state right now.

But maybe I missed the relevant part ?

Originally posted by EnochWasRight
reply to post by EnochWasRight

 

Educate yourself into the exact nature of rfid class iii semi-passive biobond. Your new RFID includes some amazing technologies. LINK You can even get your credit report included on the chip. So many uses on such a tiny chip. With a range of 100 meters and increasing, this chip is a wonder of NWO development.

Our VeriMed system, which includes our VeriChip, is designed to rapidly and accurately identify people who are unconscious, confused or unable to communicate at the time of medical treatment, for example, upon arrival at a hospital emergency room. The VeriChip is a passive RFID microchip, approximately the size of a grain of rice, which is implanted under the skin in a patient’s upper right arm under the supervision of a physician. The capsule is coated with a polymer, BioBond TM to form adherence to human tissue, thereby preventing migration in the body. Each microchip contains a unique 16-digit identification number. With that identification number, emergency room personnel or EMTs can securely obtain from our or a third party’s database the patient’s pre-approved information, including the patient’s name, primary care physician, emergency contact information, advance directives and, if the patient elects, other pertinent data, such as personal health records. We have not actively marketed the VeriMed system since early 2008.

edit on 21-3-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)

There is the pretty red bow to make it seem like a grand idea

My iPhone updates and I can do more with it, will the same thing be possible with these chips? You bet.

Originally posted by H1ght3chHippie
This has nothing to do with putting RFID chips into anyones body, but it regulates that the manufacturers of devices that are meant to be implanted into human bodies ( like prostheses, artificial joints, pacemakers, etc ) have to register such devices in a central database in order to start collecting data about their safety and so on.
On top of that it says that all collected data will be accessible by the public and private research organizations to improve the safety of such devices. I am surprised that no national registry of such devices exists already, apparently there are different standards in place per state right now.

But maybe I missed the relevant part ?

You are correct. If there's an RFID, it will be in the artificial hip, knee etc. I used to work in surgery, and I had a little sticker that I'd peel off the box the implant came in and attached it to the medical record. This had the serial number of the device. This was used in case of recall so we would know the lot number and serial number of the device you had.

So everyone can relax. This is just to track devices.

Edit to say that I think it's safe to say if there were ever some sort of Mandatory RFID implant plan, millions would refuse. Like, most anyone who's ever been in a church. Unless of course you would slowly starve without it, in other words need it to buy and sell. Then hang it up, we're in the end.

I'm not a Mormon, but I think they are spot on with their doctrine of storing at least a years worth of food... Maybe they could avoid the mark of the beast...

So what is the problem with taking this RFID other than of course the typical "Hacking?

We have been id'ing people since we could start writing this is just a digital form of it. Unless you can give me a more nefarious reasons.

Originally posted by littled16
reply to post by EnochWasRight

 

And people think that the feds trying to curb our second amendment rights or an economic collapse is what will end up causing a civil war! I would say that trying to force people into allowing them to implant ANY kind of foreign device into their bodies is when the real uprising will begin! I hope they have enough space in their FEMA camps/indoctrination centers for at least half of the citizens of the US if they try it because that dog ain't gonna hunt!

They would not force people. They will rely on our laziness and lack of awareness. Fees will guarantee that a choice is made. Keep an eye on this. They will make it harder and harder to say no as time passes. Two days from now is only the beginning of the process. Companies all over the world are gearing up in every country. This is a huge industry and a great deal of money will be made from fees and development. Make it fashionable and people will follow. They will make people who resist out to be wackos.

No laws necessary. The media will take care of it over the course of a few years. As the economy collapses, you will be given incentives to come one board. Eventually, the people who resist will be in the minority.

reply to post by EnochWasRight


I agree with you that the technology exists. However, in one of the drafts of the Affordable Care Act, there WAS a section on the chips but in the final version, that section was not put into the current bill that was made law.....

Legally, (at this point) I am not aware of any law that requires anyone to be chipped if they do not want it! Not to say in a martial law situation that it may be forced upon people or that "illegally" people may be chipped without their knowledge.......

Agenda 21 is after all part of the globalists plan to inventory EVERYTHING, including people.

Originally posted by abeverage
So what is the problem with taking this RFID other than of course the typical "Hacking?

We have been id'ing people since we could start writing this is just a digital form of it. Unless you can give me a more nefarious reasons.

Other than the fact that the Bible expressly predicts this technology in Revelation 13, It is a form of control over commerce. The first step is to mandate that you purchase obamacare. The next step is the same story, second verse. We also have the coming UNESCO Carbon Tax and Trading System for the new monetary system. Do a search for UNESCO and Carbon Trading. What do you see?

UNESCO and Biosphere Reserves for Carbon Trading

reply to post by EnochWasRight


I see yet more misinformed bull#.

Nice try, using stories from a book to justify such ignorance.

Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by EnochWasRight

 

I agree with you that the technology exists. However, in one of the drafts of the Affordable Care Act, there WAS a section on the chips but in the final version, that section was not put into the current bill that was made law.....

Legally, (at this point) I am not aware of any law that requires anyone to be chipped if they do not want it! Not to say in a martial law situation that it may be forced upon people or that "illegally" people may be chipped without their knowledge.......

Agenda 21 is after all part of the globalists plan to inventory EVERYTHING, including people.

Legally, you can't be forced to purchase products. Of course, this does not stop the government from mandating you purchase healthcare. Since they control your healthcare now, they also control your access to it. Be chipped or receive no products. If they can make you pay, they can deny you a service as well. What law do they need? They can simply tell you to go to the back of the line if you are not chipped. You can die trying to resist for all they will care. If the commerce clause means nothing, then neither does Section 242, Title 18 of US Code. We know today that it means little.

The purpose of this thread is to show the ATS community what is coming in the future. These technologies are real and our experience with our own government is clear by now: they are in bed with big money corporations. Demonstrate otherwise and you have a voice here. I do not need to rely on THE BOOK for that. It's in our face each day and people like you, coming here to say, "Nothing to see, move along people," are fast becoming ridiculous to anyone reading. What was stated in that BOOK is happening all around you. If you choose IgnoreANCE, that's your decision. I respect it. I simply do not choose to ignore truth. We agree to disagree and let the reader decide for themselves. We are here to deny your ignorance. You can hit the back button if this bothers you.

Originally posted by VaterOrlaag
reply to post by EnochWasRight

 

I see yet more misinformed bull#.

Nice try, using stories from a book to justify such ignorance.

Originally posted by H1ght3chHippie
This has nothing to do with putting RFID chips into anyones body, but it regulates that the manufacturers of devices that are meant to be implanted into human bodies ( like prostheses, artificial joints, pacemakers, etc ) have to register such devices in a central database in order to start collecting data about their safety and so on.
On top of that it says that all collected data will be accessible by the public and private research organizations to improve the safety of such devices. I am surprised that no national registry of such devices exists already, apparently there are different standards in place per state right now.

But maybe I missed the relevant part ?

I agree with your assessment. I believe we have something similar in Canada. All medical devices used inside or outside the body have to be registered so that health care officials, the companies who make the devices and the patients are informed as to how the device works and if there are any issues with a particular device. As well this information can be easily accessed by all.

Originally posted by RedShirt73

Originally posted by H1ght3chHippie
This has nothing to do with putting RFID chips into anyones body, but it regulates that the manufacturers of devices that are meant to be implanted into human bodies ( like prostheses, artificial joints, pacemakers, etc ) have to register such devices in a central database in order to start collecting data about their safety and so on.
On top of that it says that all collected data will be accessible by the public and private research organizations to improve the safety of such devices. I am surprised that no national registry of such devices exists already, apparently there are different standards in place per state right now.

But maybe I missed the relevant part ?

I agree with your assessment. I believe we have something similar in Canada. All medical devices used inside or outside the body have to be registered so that health care officials, the companies who make the devices and the patients are informed as to how the device works and if there are any issues with a particular device. As well this information can be easily accessed by all.

Of course this is the case, but the literature you can read tells a different story. Follow the money. Chipping a few implants cannot possible be the context of the investment made into this technology. If you do some reading, you will quickly find that this is going to be a HUGE business and they are not gearing this up to implant prosthetic devices. The websites make it clear that people are the target audience for this technology. Again, simply follow the money and actually read what the websites say in the open.

Do some reading. Educate yourself. This is all I am saying. Read this link.

Originally posted by EnochWasRight

Originally posted by abeverage
So what is the problem with taking this RFID other than of course the typical "Hacking?

We have been id'ing people since we could start writing this is just a digital form of it. Unless you can give me a more nefarious reasons.

Other than the fact that the Bible expressly predicts this technology in Revelation 13, It is a form of control over commerce. The first step is to mandate that you purchase obamacare. The next step is the same story, second verse. We also have the coming UNESCO Carbon Tax and Trading System for the new monetary system. Do a search for UNESCO and Carbon Trading. What do you see?

UNESCO and Biosphere Reserves for Carbon Trading

There already are forms of control over commerce and trade it is called MONEY! I already exchange money in my hand to another hand! Now I was hoping this would have a religious slant to it because if you take the mark so what?

Religious or not I doubt there will be many who will not have to be forced to take this implant...So it will have to be forced! What if I AM FORCED TO TAKE THE MARK? Then what? I go to hell?

Originally posted by abeverage

Originally posted by EnochWasRight

Originally posted by abeverage
So what is the problem with taking this RFID other than of course the typical "Hacking?

We have been id'ing people since we could start writing this is just a digital form of it. Unless you can give me a more nefarious reasons.

Other than the fact that the Bible expressly predicts this technology in Revelation 13, It is a form of control over commerce. The first step is to mandate that you purchase obamacare. The next step is the same story, second verse. We also have the coming UNESCO Carbon Tax and Trading System for the new monetary system. Do a search for UNESCO and Carbon Trading. What do you see?

UNESCO and Biosphere Reserves for Carbon Trading

There already are forms of control over commerce and trade it is called MONEY! I already exchange money in my hand to another hand! Now I was hoping this would have a religious slant to it because if you take the mark so what?

Religious or not I doubt there will be many who will not have to be forced to take this implant...So it will have to be forced! What if I AM FORCED TO TAKE THE MARK? Then what? I go to hell?

That form of control breaks down when they can tell you what you must buy. When this happens, you lose your will over that money. This is very much like what they are proposing with your investments. Trillions of dollars are just sitting there waiting for the government to manage. If you wish to take any of it out now, you pay penalties. You are taxed on every dime you take out. You are taxed when you put it in. You will pay a fee for your RFID when it is required. You will likely pay the fee for those Americans who cannot afford their own. You will likely pay a fee for the wireless connection to a cell carrier. Who knows, maybe we will be our own walking wifi hotspot. I'm sure there will be an app you can purchase to read your own chip.

reply to post by EnochWasRight


You did not answer my question. So what? And what about babies? Surely hospitals will be implanting children shortly after they are born with our without parental consent. So what?