MARS: Fossilized Lizard? Large Image.

reply to post by Vasa Croe

Originally posted by Zarniwoop
reply to post by Vasa Croe

 

Bwaaahaahahahaha! Very nicely done. I totally see it now.

reply to post by Zarniwoop


NOW I see it!



I was going to say bird at first.

reply to post by CALGARIAN


Thats a good picture of a fossilized ROCK!

it doesnt look like any natural rock formation to me ........ GODZILLA

reply to post by CALGARIAN


Great Find!! S&F.


A long TAIL.............

Interesting find OP, 1 just wonders where are its tracks?

NAMASTE*******

Are all you guys still arguing if there are rocks on Mars? As I've pointed out before, I think ATS has proven that there are no rocks on Mars, just lizards and assorted toys and gizmos, whatnots, and whatzamacallits.

As for the lizard, good muscle tone in its legs, and the tail is very nice. But he's walking a little close to the ground, and may get scraped up quite a bit. The large eye is obviously for night vision, for when his prey comes out. And I don't see any toes, just feet like flippers, which may be useful to skim along the surface quickly like a pair of cross-country skis.

But where is its mate? If someone can find a few of these things, all of the same kind, on one or different pics, then we have something to really talk about. And what if Arken came up with another Hugo to match the first one! Ha! You'd have the MSM, or at least a scandal sheet or two, beating down a path to your door.

Originally posted by Aleister
And I don't see any toes, just feet like flippers, which may be useful to skim along the surface quickly, like a pair of cross-country skis.

i see a rock that to some people resembles a 2d image of a lizard

transmission RETURN

it is as if psy ops are / were ran/run to detect Pareidolia in members to determine if wishful thinking associated with astral travels -detected- and RV cosmic or ACTUAL as well as HEAVEN/Hell. Which is interesting way with the Mars rock and a "REAL" here and there just wanted to tell you all HELLO and not that wishful they in whom some may wonder.

closed.

Now MRO images in different colors would be nice of the ENERGY there.

LOVE LIGHT ETERNIA*******

reply to post by TinkerHaus


Also during a asteroid bombardment it would just curl up. And take a nice comfy nap in the hundred below zero atmosphere. Where other adamantium skinned lizards would sit and wait for the annunaki and planet z or x. To show up. And help them to build pyramids and temples lit up by baghdad batteries. So they could see there well camoflage mates better in the dark. Knowing all along that one day they could send a rover to saturn. And prove once and for all that there was other life out there at one time.

reply to post by TinkerHaus


Tinker you just cracked me up!



OP I see no lizard just like I saw no lizard in the other thread that claimed a lizard was on Mars.

If there is only rocks on mars why spend money going there again and again? What good will it do?

So what if it had water? So what if it could support life once?
Why keep going back? Waste of money nasa!

They say you are what you eat and this applies to reptiles too. This proves the point, this lizard has eaten so many rocks that it has turned into one itself. The poor little guy couldn't find anything else to eat. What an existence

Originally posted by symptomoftheuniverse
If there is only rocks on mars why spend money going there again and again? What good will it do?

So what if it had water? So what if it could support life once?
Why keep going back? Waste of money nasa!

Because beneath the surface, in the right places, there could be evidence of life, perhaps beyond microbial. Imagine what an uncovered skeleton of any animal would do to our understanding of life and our own origins.

We have only scratched the surface of Mars. We need to get even more advanced robots or actual people with archaeological skills on the planet to have a proper dig around.

Nasa says mars is dead. Like the moon. No point in wasting money on mars. Lets help the poor instead. Rich boys and their toys hey,problem is its we are paying for the toys.

reply to post by symptomoftheuniverse

Compared to military and other expenditures, both the Mars missions and the space telescopes are a drop in the bucket. Most science geeks would want the money ramped up a hundredfold, and send more rovers to Mars, get that manned mission started, send rovers to Europa and Titan and other moons, plop a few more onto every planet, and fund everyone's most far out ideas of great telescopes - both space and earth based. What the U.S. and Europe did with the bank and corporate pay-offs a few years ago, you take a quarter of that and put it into space research and then us geeks may be happier. As for this Mars mission, I wish there were twenty more like it, all operating at the same time.