It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So which is it? greek mythology or Christian 'knowledge'?
Originally posted by Bybyots
reply to post by Extralien
So which is it? greek mythology or Christian 'knowledge'?
It's both, man. You can't really understand Christianity without understanding the Greeks. That, for one thing, is how you learn that Origen could have never anticipated the hermeneutical power of Google.
P.S. After you do the Greeks, go directly to Plotinus; who was Roman.edit on 18-3-2013 by Bybyots because: .
Hercules and the Hydra
(ca. 1475) by Antonio del Pollaiuolo
the hero wears his characteristic lionskin and wields a club
Originally posted by Bybyots
There is no reason that I can think of as to why a Catholic artist would not portray The Resurrected Christ as emerging from some morass of chaotic shapes, as Fazzini has done in his sculpture. Remember, the work is called, The Resurrection.
The Apostle's Creed
I believe in God,
the Father almighty,
Creator of heaven and earth,
and in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord,
who was conceived by the Holy Spirit,
born of the Virgin Mary,
suffered under Pontius Pilate,
was crucified, died and was buried;
he descended into hell;
on the third day he rose again from the dead;
he ascended into heaven,
and is seated at the right hand of God the Father almighty;
from there he will come to judge the living and the dead.
I believe in the Holy Spirit,
the holy catholic Church,
the communion of saints,
the forgiveness of sins,
the resurrection of the body,
and life everlasting. Amen.
en.wikipedia.org...
The last place Jesus was, before he rose from the dead was Hades, scholars believe that it was modernized to read "Hell".
edit on 18-3-2013 by Bybyots because: .
Originally posted by Senduko
Okay I want to point some things out with two clear pictures, as
people have said before the sculpture that is called the
Resurrezione is CLEARLY not the same sculpture that was
shown on TV.
And I read a comment here that the sculpture says its his lifeworks
his masterpiece, so what are the chances he made two? And the
last one seems bigger and more vile and you can almost feel the evil
that is the church.
Sounds crazy and all but it almost looks like the statue grew over
the years... turning more vile..
The real Ressurezione
Originally posted by DarknStormy
Originally posted by LastStarfighter
Right the vatican set up a nuclear explosion. You are looking to wrong the place. Wake up
But the other thing people don't touch upon is his relationship with what looks like Catholic Jesuit priests. Hitler was a catholic also.
The seventh circle houses the violent. Its entry is guarded by the Minotaur, and it is divided into three rings:...
... Middle ring: In this ring are suicides and profligates. The suicides – the violent against self – are transformed into gnarled thorny bushes and trees and then fed upon by Harpies. Dante breaks a twig off one of the bushes and from the broken, bleeding branch hears the tale of Pietro della Vigne, who committed suicide...
... Dante learns that these suicides, unique among the dead, will not be corporally resurrected after the final judgement since they gave away their bodies through suicide; instead they will maintain their bushy form, with their own corpses hanging from the thorny limbs.
Originally posted by Bybyots
The sculpture in the throne room behind the Pope is called La Resurrezione ("The Resurrection") and it is by Italian artist, Pericle Fazzini.
He began work on the thing in 1970 and finished it in 1977, just in time for Star Wars. He considered it to be his masterpiece, and if you can believe it, it's a bronze.
It looks to me as though it is very hard to get close enough to it to get any good detail images, it also just looks like it is plain hard to photograph.
It is also probably important to note that Fazzini had obvious surrealist influences, at least, and that is why people probably find a touch of the 'grotesque' in the work.
The thing is convoluted to the point that it should come as no surprise that it be as conducive to pareidolia as any assembly of clouds; in fact, more so, if one has some religious paranoia going on.
So, no, I don't see a 'Baphomet', and yes, I think way too much is being read in to the image.
edit on 17-3-2013 by Bybyots because: