It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One ofthe most common representationsin early Nasca art
wasthe Anthropomorphic Mythical Being, a human male dressed in elaborate ritual
paraphernalia, holding a severed human head in one hand and a club in the other.
Scholars have argued whetherthis creature represents a shaman or "masked
impersonator", or a supernaturalfigure
Trophy heads were first associated with a Paracas motif known asthe "Oculate Being", a wide-eyed creature holding a trophy head in one hand and a knife, which was used to remove the head
. The Oculate Being was replaced by the Anthropomorphic Mythical Being. Like the Oculate Being, this
creature also displayed severed heads in its hand, attached to the belt, and appended tothe cape.
The Jivaro believed that these souls protected them against sorcery, disease and death, but that they must be periodically replenished with new, more powerful souls as the power drained from the older ones
The ritual killing of another individual was seen as the primary means of gaining accessto a new arutam.Jivaro males formed raiding parties and attacked an isolated household in the early morning hours. Emboldened by the taking of hallucinogenic drugs, the Jivaro murdered as many people as possible, removing their heads in the process.
In addition, other trophy heads found within Nasca cemeteries were treated the same as full-bodied Nasca burialsin terms of grave goods and preparation, leading to the conclusion that ritual fighting took place within Nasca society
The strongest evidence linking head taking with agricultural fertility is a number of depictions of
trophy heads with plants growing out of their mouths. There seems to be a direct link between death/decapitation/blood regeneration/rebirth/agricultural fertility.
Originally posted by phantomjack
While you have attempted to go into detail, your original hypothesis is just flawed.
I, too, give you points for your work, but I can't quite buy into the cactus analogy. I have been told that the lines might well form a series of directions (water, mountain passes) when viewed on the proper plane. And I will add that the crosshatching motif on the ceramics is a common form of decoration, even up here in the Great Pink North. But please keep applying your imagination to the artifacts and features at hand. That's how "Eureka!" moments are nurtured. S&F!
Originally posted by Kantzveldt
Surprisingly it isn't difficult to ascertain the design criteria of the Nazca lines, their form is readily understandable, their function requires a little investigation of Nazcan and the Paracas culture that preceded them.
Originally posted by Kantzveldt
reply to post by phantomjack
And the flaw is...?
Given that there were not apparently any Frost fences around, it wouldn't be what we called a 'waffle'...but I digress.
Originally posted by Kantzveldt
Cross hatching is common, but also in this case there is a clear concern with nets and grids, they didn't put cross hatching motifs on the female figurines buttocks without good reason...
This sacred plant has been used for thousands of years by the ancient cultures of our nation. The clearest traces of the use of San Pedro in antiquity, are in the Chavin culture, which developed in northern Peru 3,500 years ago, although we assume that its use should be traced back to many centuries before the formation of Chavin. Its use has continued throughout history to this day, having been used by the Mochica, Chimu, Nazca, Tiwanaku, Wari, etc.
There are several ways to prepare this medicine, the plant can be eaten fresh and raw, dried and pulverized by adding water or refined cooking of several hours can also be prepared in a mixture with other herbs. It is recommended that the dose be administered by a physician knowledgeable healer the preparation of medicine.