It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RP2SticksOfDynamite
It appears to be a rock, no its not, ah its a rock, or maybe its a..., no its definately a rock surrounded by millions of rocks on the surface of,........wait for it............................a big f.ck.n ROCK!
Rest my case which aint rocky!!!
I still see a Lizard.
Originally posted by RP2SticksOfDynamite
Its what it is thjat matters (reality), not what you see or think it is (not reality).
when is a rock not a rock, when its not a rock and not something you think it is thats not a rock.
Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by DarKPenguiN
I still see a Lizard.
In this picture I see a Rat but it is just a rock .
Prove to me medusa does not slither the red Planet.... Thought so...
NASA is notorious for changing the color of the photos...the question should be why....why do they feel the need to change the colors?
Originally posted by eriktheawful
The only problem I see with it being any type of animal is: Eco system.
Where is it's food? Does it need water?
Why be the same color as the rocks? That indicates the need to hide from other creatures. Where are they?
So we have a creature that looks like a Earth lizard.....but is able to survive such a thin atmosphere, that is very negligent in oxygen, no water needed, and can apparently absorb very high amounts of radiation from the sun.....
Any other pictures of it? Has it moved?
Of course, it could be that the Martian landscape is really as red as the NASA version shows. But given that it's scientifically acceptable for the Martian sky to be more or less blue, combined with the fact that we have quite compelling photographic evidence like one shown below from the Viking missions exposing the excessive redness of the original pictures released by NASA (the adjusted version on the right shows the colors of the American flag accurately), it is not so farfetched to suppose that NASA has been deceiving all of us about the real appearance of Mars all these years. [The 'correct' image below was produced by Barry Arneson (?) in 2001.]
Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by DarKPenguiN
Prove to me medusa does not slither the red Planet.... Thought so...
Medusa is a mythological creature created by Humans on Earth , it doesn't nor has it ever existed on Earth so why would it exist on Mars .
If that's not proof I don't know what is .
Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by DarKPenguiN
I still see a Lizard.
In this picture I see a Rat but it is just a rock .
Medusa Mythological? I think not
You prove nothing.
Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by DarKPenguiN
Medusa Mythological? I think not
You are entitled to your opinion .
You prove nothing.
With that post you have proved something to me , I will leave you undisturbed under your bridge
There is absolutely nothing that can be [color=FFDD99]plainly seen within any of those blurry pics.
Lizard [color=FFDD99]in plain sight and Creature with tentacles on Curiosity Sol 198!
Just a hunch, but possibly because You =
Originally posted by ListenUpNow
WHY IS EVERYONE IGNORING ME!!
Originally posted by jazztrance
I have a good question,,,,WHY WHY WHY are the pics so blurry and crappy. Seems like they would use atleast a 4 megapixel camera.