This is how the New World Order will be achieved

reply to post by Murgatroid


and which version of the bible are you refering to, the original gospels which constantine outlawed and burnt except 4 of them, or the re-written by man version we have today. I believe in God and do believe their is truth in the Gospels, but the bible we know today is mostly propaganda rubbish, there is some truth in it ( as there is the Quran, and other religious text) Constantine was nothing more than a murderous roman emperor who's job was to expand and maintain an empire, all of which are contradictory to what the bible teaches. the original story is true but it has been clouded and manipulated, so therefor cannot be trusted, The sabbath day is Saturday, not sunday ("SUN"day)

reply to post by AprenticeofLight

Originally posted by AprenticeofLight
and which version of the bible are you refering to, the original gospels which constantine outlawed and burnt except 4 of them, or the re-written by man version we have today. I believe in God and do believe their is truth in the Gospels, but the bible we know today is mostly propaganda rubbish...

And which version of dis-info are YOU referring to?

You say that "the bible is propaganda rubbish, and cannot be trusted " while at the same time you put your trust in and base your argument on propaganda and disinformation from known Illuminati shills.

You are saying that the Bible is propaganda while USING propaganda to back up your argument.

Do you realize the absolute sheer IRONY of this?

Instead of trusting God, you are placing your trust in the Illuminati, whose CEO is the father of ALL lies.

The Da Vinci Code Claims that the four Gospels were selected by Constantine from eighty others. Brown writes: 'Constantine commissioned and financed a new Bible, which omitted those gospels that spoke of Christ's human traits and embellished those gospels that made Him godlike. The earlier gospels were outlawed, gathered up, and burned' (p. 317). Or again: 'More than eighty gospels were considered for the New Testament, and yet only a relative few were chosen for inclusion' (p. 313). This is wrong.

Emperor Constantine - Did he remove books from the Bible?

Dan Brown has followed the classic route of disinformation artist. Having established his credibility as a concerned citizen Brown then went on to spread disinformation about some of the major themes of the Rothschild secret empire including, in his 2001 novel Deception Point, the notion that governments are hiding the truth about extraterrestrial life.

What then is the objective of establishment backed stories about secret socities? Now that the internet has allowed the cat out of the bag and people are aware of the Knights Templar; the Rosicrucians; the Freemasons; the Illuminati and the esoteric symbology they share, these organisations are attempting to influence the public's perception through controlled disinformation.

Dan Brown » Controlled Opposition

Manuscript evidence for the New Testament is remarkable, far surpassing that which exists for any other ancient book. And those who work with these ancient copies (called "textual critics") are convinced that they have been able to recover a Greek New Testament which is virtually identical to the original.

This evidence does not prove that the Bible is the word of God. But it does demonstrate conclusively that the Bible you have is the same which was first written by its authors. When Teabing (the Da Vinci Code's "historian") asserts, "History has never had a definitive version of the book" and claims that scholars cannot confirm the authenticity of the Bible, he's simply wrong.

Is the Bible true?

And the Vatican's intense propaganda continues as they simply are supplying huge payoffs to their friends in Hollywood to keep the real truth from the masses.

Let's start with screen writer Dan Brown of Da Vinci Code fame and move on to Vatican shills, movie director Ron Howard and leading actor in the film, Tom Hanks, who also starred in the Da Vinci Code.

And to factually remind American movie fans of the Vatican and Jesuit connection to this film, eye witnesses in Rome reported that in May of 2007, the trio mentioned above along with media mogul Rupert Murdoch and high level Jesuits and a Vatican Cardinal all met to discuss the film's financing.

Further, they all met to discuss important propaganda points that must be brought out in the film in order to make the black robed Vaticanites appear as innocent and white as snowflakes falling from heaven.

Looking at the group assembled, we know Brown and Murdoch have sold their souls to Lucifer and the Vatican satanists, but shouldn't Howard and Hanks do some research before accepting the Vatican's dirty money?

Vatican Propaganda Reaches All-Time High

Originally posted by AprenticeofLight
reply to post by Elliot

 

the problem with that is, you are not invited to the show. and you are right nations and power rise and fall, but what your teachers have failed to realize is that. most of our history, all the wars, crusades, terrorism, you name it, has all been for the New world order, it is the original plan that these Cabal worshiping Zionists have been working on for the longest of time. all these exchanges of power and structures has all been for the new world order.

Well these "cabal worshing Zionists" are terrible at their job. They went from a world where a most of humanity was under the rule of a handful of empires that would have been much easier to bring under a one world rule, where between religion and political power most people were firmly under the boot of small population and were kept poorly educated and out of communication. To now a world with hundreds of nations, where people have freedom then anytime in human history, have the ability to communicate and organize with anybody on the planet. have the freedom to talk about anything the want including things like the NWO, and have information once reserved for the very elite at their fingure tips. Either the NWO does not exist or the completely and totaly incompetent. Either way its complete was to worry about them because they have failed to do anything thus far other than move the world further away from unity.

Yes i agree, but i would be more worried about how the use of a frequency range (0 - 3000Mhz) can be used to harm people. Furthermore, how can individuals build such a thing and use it in society? I say we build a receiver of some sort that can detect it such as on radar and that way we can stop it happening in our societies once and for all.

Check it out:

www.stephen-knapp.com...