It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kyviecaldges
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
I calculated wrong. I missed a decimal.
The amount of cash in circulation at this time is 1.17 trillion.
But that only exemplifies my point even more, because for every one of those dollars that we owe on our deficit, we actually owe a federal reserve note. The deficit can only be paid in federal reserve notes, and federal reserve notes by nature are instruments of inflation.
For every dollar/fed note we borrow to facilitate our economy, we owe more than 1 dollar back.
This is all econ 101 stuff.
We never have enough money in circulation to pay off the value of federal reserve notes.
Now, maybe foreign capital could take care of that, but that is irrelevant.
By removing billions from the economy, we are creating deflation, which is the exact opposite of what we need.
You can speculate and I can speculate, but in the end we can only see what happens, and I predict that this sequester will stall growth and effectively destroy any headway we have created.
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
Originally posted by Majiq1
reply to post by TauCetixeta
Yeah I see that, but that is just the budget deficit. That will continue to fall as the "sequester cuts" increase. The problem is that the sequester cuts will stop at about 84-85 billion. they are already up to over 15 billion. sequester is a start but doesn't do nearly enough and will not bring down the debt. In fact the debt is on a steady rise. We need real cuts in spending, not this sequester which only slows growth of government
Food For Thought: Is it possible will see a Sequester 2.0 in the near future?
For Example: Another $85 Billion?
History Can repeat itself.
Bringing Down The National Debt: That will require an economic boom like
President Clinton saw during the Dot.com BOOM.
I remember when the first SURPLUS arrived for Clinton. Washington D.C. was caught
off guard when the......unexpected.....Cap Gains Tax Checks arrived at the IRS.
Also, Newt controlled spending. Goal: Aim For Zero
4 years of surpluses arrived during the 1990s.
When surpluses arrive again THEN we can talk about " Bringing Down The National Debt".
edit on 8-3-2013 by TauCetixeta because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kyviecaldges
OOPS!
"I predict that this sequester will stall growth and effectively destroy any headway we have created."
Well, that is what happens when someone COMPLETELY IGNORES the private sector.
You appear to have blinders on.
When the U.S. Government doesn't spend like crazy then the U.S. economy automatically
gets flushed down the toilet.
Did you by any chance see the Job Report today??? Unemployment rate fell to 7.7%.
236,000 jobs added!
So much the Sequester Doom & Gloom Monster.
We have switched to Plan B: Put the U.S. Government in --- neutral ---
and grow the Private Sector instead.
Current USA economic boom : Fracking North Dakota & Residential New Homes
are selling fast! Praying for an economic disaster won't work just because the
Sequester is now in effect.
Originally posted by sean
They are all bat sh!t crazy. The first thing they do is go after the janitor the one that is the least paid and least impact on anything. Everything that is given to them is paid by the taxes. Not much is spent directly out of their wages. They just don't want to admit that they are living high off the hog. There is lots to be cut there. They need to come back to reality plain. Down here where the majority live off a grossly underpaid poverty level income.
Originally posted by Majiq1
reply to post by TauCetixeta
The chart is based on current spending rates. And a steady increase in taxes. The sequester doesn't accomplish this, and the tax hikes won't either as spending will not remain at the current level.