It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NarcolepticBuddha
I'm not sure, but have always wondered, when and where we dropped the fur in favor of sweat glands etc. Maybe Byrd knows a little more about this one.
there is very little neanderthal DNA in us based of studies on mtDNA , that signifies that that cro-magnon males were the ones impregnating neanderthal women for that 1-5% of DNA to be present. I said earlier that its a sign of violent pairing.
Because mtDNA passes directly from mother to children. Dad's mtDNA is destroyed when the sperm fertilizes the egg. The Neanderthal mtDNA would be lost but there would be plenty of Neanderthal nuclear DNA around.
There are a number of possibilities here. One is that these new people attack and kill everyone in your tribe. They move into your cave and you are forgotten until the 1850's when your bones are found.
Or there's plenty of food so you each mind your own business. As time goes by, there are more and more of these people. Eventually your descendants slowly die out leaving just these African interlopers.
And finally, maybe we all just get along and have kids together. What comes out of this is some hybrid between the Africans and the Neanderthals.
Which idea is right? No one really knows. What we do know is that Neanderthals ruled Europe for hundreds of thousands of years. Then by 30,000 years ago, they were all gone.
We also know that Neanderthals and our predecessors, Cro-Magnon man, overlapped in Europe for thousands of years. And that they may have lived near one another at the same time. So Neanderthal's disappearance was not quick.
So, did Neanderthals die out or did we interbreed? After so much time this is hard to figure out. One way solve this puzzle is to look for Neanderthal DNA in ours.
The most straightforward way to do this is to look at Neanderthal DNA. And compare it to ours.
Until very recently, this wasn't possible with most of their DNA. So scientists looked at the little snippets they could get a hold of. Or compared African and European DNA to look for differences that might suggest mixing. One group even postulated that red hair came from Neanderthals!
All of these studies suffer from the same thingnot enough Neanderthal DNA to compare human DNA to. New technologies are now making more Neanderthal DNA readable.
Neanderthal genocide or assimilation
As I said, around 30,000 years ago there were no Neanderthals left in Europe. Either they integrated with Cro-Magnon or died out.
There is strong genetic evidence that we just replaced the Neanderthals in Europe. This evidence comes from the little bit of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) that scientists have managed to pull from a few Neanderthal fossils.
Why did they want to look at mtDNA? Because they could. There is a whole lot of it in a cell making it relatively easy to get.
This kind of DNA is a cool relic from our evolutionary past (click here to learn more). Instead of just two copies per cell like our chromosomes, our cells have thousands of copies of mtDNA.
Because there is so much of this DNA, we are able to get some from unlikely sources. Like hair or mammoths. Or Neanderthals.
When scientists looked at this DNA, they found that it was pretty different from modern day European mtDNA. Too different for there to have been much more than 25% mixing.
Of course, if we were 25% Neanderthal, that would be a lot of Neanderthal. However, a recent study looking at the same data suggests that mixing was much lower than this.
The paper claims that if advancing Cro-Magnon men assimilated Neanderthals into the population along the way, then there should be a lot of Neanderthal DNA in all of us. Why?
Imagine that you have a group of Africans and they come up against a group of Neanderthals. These two groups laugh and sing and have babies. Or the occasional Cro-Magnon sneaks out for a tryst with a Neanderthal.
After a while, the valley is getting a little crowded. So this mixed tribe moves over to the next valley where more Neanderthals live. The same thing happens. And no new Africans enter Europe.
As this wave spreads across Europe, there would be an awful lot of Neanderthal DNA in the final mixed group. And yet, we find very little mixing to have happened.
The authors conclude that in order to see the level of mtDNA overlap that we see, there had to be 120 matings or less. In thousands of years. Not much at all.
And yet, other groups assume a lot of mixing. One group decided to compare European and African DNA and look for differences. There were plenty. Too many they claimed to be explained simply by the two groups being apart for a long time.
he best explanation for the level of differences was some mixing between Cro-Magnon DNA and other DNA both in Europe and in Africa. In fact, the best way to explain the data was to say that the mixing rate was around 5%. That is 1 in 20.
The difference in the numbers between these two studies is huge. Of course both of these ideas are speculative and not really based on Neanderthal DNA from the nucleus. They are tied up in models that extrapolate the data back 30,000 years to explain our past.
This is very tricky to do and a small change in the model can have huge effects. Now I do want to re-emphasize that the first group did look at mtDNA. But this kind of DNA makes up just 1/300,000th of our DNA and so it is a pretty small bit to look at.
What if Cro-Magnon didn't find Neanderthal women attractive? But the Neanderthal men loved Cro-Magnon women? Then you might end up with a lot of mixing that is invisible to mtDNA. Why?
Because mtDNA passes directly from mother to children. Dad's mtDNA is destroyed when the sperm fertilizes the egg. The Neanderthal mtDNA would be lost but there would be plenty of Neanderthal nuclear DNA around.
The kind of economy wouldn't allow large numbers. If anybody survived with Neanderthal genes from those times, a new wave which came after the Ice Age, would have assimilated them easily and only traces of Neanderthal genes would be left in modern Europeans or Asians.
Originally posted by Plugin
Came across this article, which I find an interesting take/look on the Neanderhaler which states the Neanderthaler was basicly savage, cannibalistic carnivores - top flight predators of the stone age
www.themandus.org...
When you assume they where basicly humans and you reconstruct them in pictures and so on, they could be really realy wrong about how they looked really.edit on 5-3-2013 by Plugin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by tadamanapparently it is full of errors, and honestly after looking it over some more, it has some very blatant errors that even I can see. It is interesting though.
I hang my head in shame......
EDIT:
one thing that I did find interesting was the comparison of neanderthal eyes with our own
The author implies that being that the eye sockets were larger, which I am sorry byrd they are,
Maybe the more squared eye sockets provide better protection from light.
Originally posted by Hopechest
The fossil evidence shows that they were skillful, innovative, adaptive, and creative.
Apparently not enough to beat out the homosapiens. Survival of the fittest in nature is the rule.
Originally posted by tadaman
I see civilization as the dawn of evil in men as well.
Originally posted by Blue Shift
Originally posted by Hopechest
The fossil evidence shows that they were skillful, innovative, adaptive, and creative.
Apparently not enough to beat out the homosapiens. Survival of the fittest in nature is the rule.
As successful as they were for the million or so years they lived, they never did better. They made the same tools, but never improved on them, like a bird building a sophisticated nest. All instinct, not much insight or inspiration.
My theory is that they tended all to be at the same level of intelligence, and never really produced super geniuses like humans did. So much of human advancement is a result of a small number of exceptional intellects that kind of drag the rest of us forward and upward. Neanderthals never had a Confucius, Imhotep, DaVinci or Newton or Einstein.