It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Homeland Security's specifications say drones must be able to detect whether a civilian is armed. Also specified: "signals interception" and "direction finding" for electronic surveillance.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has customized its Predator drones, originally built for overseas military operations, to carry out at-home surveillance tasks that have civil libertarians worried: identifying civilians carrying guns and tracking their cell phones, government documents show.
The documents provide more details about the surveillance capabilities of the department's unmanned Predator B drones, which are primarily used to patrol the United States' northern and southern borders, but have been pressed into service on behalf of a growing number of law enforcement agencies including the FBI, the Secret Service, the Texas Rangers, and local police.
Homeland Security's specifications for its drones, built by San Diego-based General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, say they "shall be capable of identifying a standing human being at night as likely armed or not," meaning carrying a shotgun or rifle. They also specify "signals interception" technology that can capture communications in the frequency ranges used by mobile phones, and "direction finding" technology that can identify the locations of mobile devices or two-way radios.
Originally posted by pheonix358
Clearly, the use of drones is an infringement of the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution.
Why do they need cell interception for border patrols?
Clearly these will be used against US citizens and are illegal. Tyranny is upon you!
P
Originally posted by Templeton
reply to post by eXia7
So these things can fly right to you based on your phone and spy on you and make a determination on whether or not you are armed? Wow. Scary stuff. I am sure it will read biometric data to to see if you are angry or aggressive. Eventually I suppose it might lead to some Judge Dredd drone bots. I love living in the future sometimes but this scares me.edit on 2-3-2013 by Templeton because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by brandiwine14
One day not too far from now an elder will be sitting around telling stories to the children, stories of freedom, of will, freedom to think for oneself, freedom to say your thoughts and opinions out loud, freedom to write them down, freedom to protect yourself from others, freedom to roam the land. The children will say to their elder "What is this freedom you speak of" then the elder will be shot dead by a drone.
This is what we are headed for. Your post scares me to my bones but I knew it to be true, I keep trying to hold out faith for the Government to turn around and remember where we came from and why it was fought so hard for.
God I loved this country so much, it's history is so rich, the people of all different walks of life and their opinions so vast, I will miss this when it's gone.
Originally posted by endats01
The expanding control grid gets a little notice here. Go back to sleep nothing here to see move along now. These are not the droids you are looking for. Perhaps they will be able to diagnose/cause cancer in mass with their back scatter x-ray technology? What a country.
Originally posted by eXia7
Here is another article on the advancing drone front. DHS has ordered their drone manufacture to include the ability to detect if a person is armed or not, either daytime or nighttime. They can also track your cellphone activity through this modified predator drone as well. (I did a search, nothing showed up, dunno about this samaru stuff)
Homeland Security's specifications say drones must be able to detect whether a civilian is armed. Also specified: "signals interception" and "direction finding" for electronic surveillance.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has customized its Predator drones, originally built for overseas military operations, to carry out at-home surveillance tasks that have civil libertarians worried: identifying civilians carrying guns and tracking their cell phones, government documents show.
The documents provide more details about the surveillance capabilities of the department's unmanned Predator B drones, which are primarily used to patrol the United States' northern and southern borders, but have been pressed into service on behalf of a growing number of law enforcement agencies including the FBI, the Secret Service, the Texas Rangers, and local police.
Homeland Security's specifications for its drones, built by San Diego-based General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, say they "shall be capable of identifying a standing human being at night as likely armed or not," meaning carrying a shotgun or rifle. They also specify "signals interception" technology that can capture communications in the frequency ranges used by mobile phones, and "direction finding" technology that can identify the locations of mobile devices or two-way radios.
current border patrol version
It seems these are getting popular with local law enforcement, and the border patrol. It wouldn't take much for them to have these modified to do domestic spying in the near future.
It seems they will keep pushing this drone issue, just like they are trying to push gun control. It's time people wake up and see that things are changing, and they are changing at an incredible pace. This type of stuff needs to be kept in check, with strict oversight. I am against domestic spying, and I see nothing good coming of this. It won't make us safer, it'll just rob us of the rest of our privacy and rights.
You can also read about the navy putting in a drone air base outside of malibu here: Malibu Navy Drone Base
news.cnet.com...edit on 3/2/2013 by eXia7 because: (no reason given)
DHS has ordered their drone manufacture to include the ability to detect if a person is armed or not
Originally posted by pheonix358
Why do they need cell interception for border patrols?