reply to post by LazarusTsiyr
problem is, you can't claim 'faith' as a source of absolute truth. Faith is not fact, therefore it cannot be used for proof.
You believe in what the bible says, which is fine by me. Problem I have with it, is books have been removed. The same ones who removed books to
secure an agenda, had it translated for the same agenda. With those facts in mind, I find myself wary of any conclusions based on a mistranslated
incomplete piece of work, regardless of its religious context in general.
I'm not even disagreeing that there is an apparent illuminati presence in the industry, but I also don't claim whether I believe it is all an act
because it is the 'thing' or subliminal efforts at control.
I do find some fault in the assumption that just because a person didn't take an acting class in high school, that a multi-millionaire family can't
afford to take some private lessons, or assume they don't have internet to learn method acting, or are stupid enough not to consider a persona;
especially considering the industry she comes from is known for doing just that ... her husband wasn't Jay-Z when born, it was a persona. It isn't
just rap industry that creates personas, look at metallica, they turned country at one point, under a different name. Was the heavy metal the
persona? the country? both? We see Ozzy isn't a bat head eating demon irl.
Add to that, Beyonce has acted before; several times.
Asking people to prove the opposition of something you can't prove yourself is a bit much, isn't it?
You can't prove she is possessed, just as much as someone can't prove she isn't. Both sides would lie in belief ... given that the person even
believes someone can be possessed in the first place, which for everyone, isn't a given.
I respect your opinion and views, and you have every right to them. I gave a look at this superbowl performance, even a video claiming the symbolism,
though not yours in particular, honestly. I tried to take first an unbiased look, then watch a biased viewpoint.
The symbolism I saw most obvious, when pointed out, would be what looked like the classical vision of hands in fire, and the use of the 'pyramid'
hand symbol, including those in the 'pit of fire' ...
Most of the stuff, as I see it, could be basically artistry and use of technology to make a flashy show that has far too high of a budget and trying
to be eye candy in an event I could care a bit less about, but I'd have to care enough to not care at all, and I can't be bothered to think enough
about it ... I didn't even realize the superbowl happened, it just isn't part of my life, nor is cable television.
I just find these topics intriguing, especially when done well; check out the symbolic stuff with Michael Jackson; I found that quite interesting,
even if my stance is neutral.
Is beyonce possessed? Hell if I know. The meme pictures of her that I saw floating around a while ago made her look more derpy than possessed ...
so possessed by the derpy demon?
If you believe in illuminati and symbolism, there are a ton of interesting things all over the internet showing possible stuff, I think the 2000 new
years had more convincing stuff than this thread thus far, besides the girl you said has a gay boy inside her that won't get out (euphemism jokes
aside); which is a much more convincing example than this one.
Seems a lot of performers need to create personas to give themselves the confidence; it is not easy to stand in front of hundreds, thousands, millions
of people and perform. I think they could, instead of creating a false sense of self, find it within themselves, and give credit to their true self,
to overcome the stressful burdens ... giving them more pride in self. I think the same could be said for actors ... I think creating 'separate
personalities' is a crutch; it is all you, not some other you. Method acting. Become the character, but know thyself first and foremost.
Some people feel 'possessed' as a way to describe their feelings ... including chemical changes in the brain. My wife, when she took estrogen
birth control felt like a 'different person', I can get a well of emotion and feel like my decision rationality has changed, some would describe
that as being a 'different person' under the effects of their own natural biological responses. Neither of us were possessed, but say a couple
hundred years ago, or to those with a bit more mythical thought process, might consider themselves possessed.
Just to reiterate on the religious aspect, there are no absolutes in it. It is real, provable, factual. Religion is belief, mythos, and in no way
provable, therefore not absolute or fact, nor can be considered a 'truth'. Similar to 'theories' in science. Big bang 'theory' based on faith
of current evidence, Earth existing is truth, factual, absolute, provable.