It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CirqueDeTruth
I guess in order to be worried...
I'd have to believe I'm significant. I'm not. Oh, and I'm a vet. They already have me tagged and bagged so to speak.
Cirque
Originally posted by CirqueDeTruth
I guess in order to be worried...
I'd have to believe I'm significant. I'm not.
Originally posted by jcutler12888
reply to post by OzarkIke
I know, and I agree. But some people take it to an extreme. I mean, would you be opposed to sharing your life story in front of a large group of people if you thought it would make a difference? You're almost safer sharing things with people online than you are in real life...in real life, people can follow you home and break in and do as they please if you aren't prepared for such situations. Online...people can troll you and try to start flame wars, they can't come through the computer and get you...and they don't have the resources available to track you down, 99% of the population doesn't, especially in America where the government keeps resources and technology for tracking people down all to themselves and away from the general public. And speaking of the government...there's no use in trying to hide. To be a total nerd and quote the Borg, "Resistance is futile". But honestly, I don't care what the government knows about me...Hell, any of the ABC's could come to my door and drag me off and throw me where ever or even put a bullet in my head and I STILL wouldn't care, but I'm rational enough to know that they would never do that. No, no...they simply wait and watch and listen, and they will do so until they decide to make a move against us all. And then, it really isn't gonna matter what I said in a support group or to my therapist or on an open forum. Neither is anything that anyone else said (or didn't say).
Well, as the person accused of data mining and potentially brainwashing you all, I feel that I should respond.
...
So I put together the questionnaire. It was off the top of my head, just curiosity.
This is really sort of a superfluous bit of worrying. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the Federal government already knows who you are. Posting identifying information online isn't going to tell them anything they don't already know - well provided one isn't stupid enough to confess to things that aren't common knowledge already.
Originally posted by Jeremiah65
... I didn't see how the questions could arrive at a legitimate commonality that would be useful in extrapolating a "cause and effect" for the phenomena the original thread was discussing.
Originally posted by WhiteAlice
reply to post by toocoolnc
Believe it or not, I'm actually a huge privacy person. I actually make a point of searching and eliminating unauthorized information about me on a regular basis for personal safety reasons. Hazard of having had a rough life. I'm also an avid blogger on privacy issues as I recognize those to be, aside from being very personally important to me, a right that isn't a right really. Madison missed privacy when he wrote the Bill of Rights and any rights to privacy are found through other amendments. That's why we have privacy issues.
That said, I pondered the questions that were being asked and found no reason to be concerned that someone would be able to identify me from the billions of other people living on this planet based on those bits of information. Sure, it asks for my astrological sign but that only narrows down my actual month of birth to two months--not even one. Zodiac signs don't follow the months--they begin around the 20th of one month and run til the 20th of the next. Country of birth/residence--well, that just says what country I'm from. It's not asking me what city/state I live in or where in particular I was born. Blood type--everybody has one. Level of education doesn't equate to age. My grandmother is nearly 90 and her highest level of education is high school. 5-8 offer no personally identifying information still and 9 is a yes/no question that still doesn't tell anybody who I am.
If you want to be concerned about your privacy, then comprehend that google tracks everything you do through them. Cookies track your activities as you go from site to site. This stuff is big money to marketers that want to better understand you so they can figure out how to appeal to you and your interests. And really, at the end of the day, unless you're using a really good proxy, any entity that would be interested in who you are could probably either demand that information via a warrant or buy it. I'm more paranoid about that than anybody knowing that I'm an INTJ Leo living in the US with a couple degrees and O neg blood.
INTJ--nothing unless it was done by a shrink. Leo narrows it down to two months of the year. Couple degrees--I'm very likely over the age of 21. US resident. O neg blood is the most potentially identifying as it's rare--6.6% incidence. That means I'm one of 220.9 million US residents over the age of 21. 6.6% incidence means I'm one of 14.6 million. Times that by 1/6 (two months out of 12 in a year) and that narrows me down to 2,420,825 people.
Not worried. Even when you count the fact that I'm female and shave it in half.
Originally posted by jude11
Anyone who gives up that type of personal info on the net is asking for trouble down the line IMO.
Anyone giving up that type of info on ATS should just spanked, scolded and spanked again...
Peace
Originally posted by jheherrin
Originally posted by Jeremiah65
... I didn't see how the questions could arrive at a legitimate commonality that would be useful in extrapolating a "cause and effect" for the phenomena the original thread was discussing.
Agreed. Absolutely pointless beyond seeing who falls for woo with no objectivity whatsoever and who doesn't. Basically the 'do you feel it?' threads are nothing more than asking about whether people are feeling social anxiety, but when you leave it open-ended, ambigious in such a way that people are 'waiting for 'something' (cue ominious music) to happen', or do you sense 'something' (ominous music), the woo factor goes into high gear. Mental pareidolia.
Originally posted by jheherrin
Originally posted by Jeremiah65
... I didn't see how the questions could arrive at a legitimate commonality that would be useful in extrapolating a "cause and effect" for the phenomena the original thread was discussing.
Agreed. Absolutely pointless beyond seeing who falls for woo with no objectivity whatsoever and who doesn't. Basically the 'do you feel it?' threads are nothing more than asking about whether people are feeling social anxiety, but when you leave it open-ended, ambigious in such a way that people are 'waiting for 'something' (cue ominious music) to happen', or do you sense 'something' (ominous music), the woo factor goes into high gear. Mental pareidolia.
Originally posted by chasingbrahman
As I read your response, I was reminded that in my Myers-Briggs assessment (which is the only thing I took from that thread) it indicated that I was a fiercely private person. Before I got to the end of reading your post I thought "Oh, another INTJ!".
Originally posted by jcutler12888
reply to post by Infi8nity
Good, cuz I sure deserve one!
Yes, that's me in my avatar. You like?edit on 2/27/2013 by jcutler12888 because: (no reason given)