It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hopechest
The only people that should be afraid of a National ID card are the ones who aren't able to work here legally in the first place.
Originally posted by Hopechest
The only people that should be afraid of a National ID card are the ones who aren't able to work here legally in the first place.
Kind of like the only people worried about where cops are hiding on the freeway are the ones who are breaking the law.edit on 22-2-2013 by Hopechest because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Hopechest
The only people that should be afraid of a National ID card are the ones who aren't able to work here legally in the first place.
Kind of like the only people worried about where cops are hiding on the freeway are the ones who are breaking the law.edit on 22-2-2013 by Hopechest because: (no reason given)
reply to post by Hopechest
The only people that should be afraid of a National ID card are the ones who aren't able to work here legally in the first place.
Originally posted by mugger
Why again do we need a National ID card when every state has ID requirements and the military has their ID which all states recognize?
Originally posted by AndyMayhew
Tony Bliar wanted to introduce an national ID card in Britain.
It went the way of the Dodo.
As of 2013, British motorists will be issued a new European driver’s license supplied by Gemalto. Compliant with EU specifications and the latest ICAO standards, the Sealys ID document exemplifies the next generation of highly securepolycarbonate cards. Its operating system is among the fastest, most interoperable on the market, enabling significant cost savings both at the personalization stage and in usage.
ICAO Compliance
Traditional identity documents are now being replaced by electronic documents with biometric features onboard; this enable machine-assisted check of person identity, both when the document is issued and successively for identity verification. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) established a specific working group to determine the most suitable way of "uniquely encoding a particular physical characteristic of a person into a biometric-identifier that can be machine-verified to confirm the presenter’s identity". Face is chosen as the primary globally interoperable biometric characteristic for machine assisted identity confirmation in Machine Readable Travel Documents (MRTD).
Originally posted by mugger
Why again do we need a National ID card when every state has ID requirements and the military has their ID which all states recognize?
On April 16, 2009 the Missouri House of Representatives passed the anti REAL ID bill HB 361 to repeal section 302.171, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof two new sections relating to noncompliance with the federal REAL ID Act of 2005 sponsored by Representative Jim Guest by a vote of 83 Ayes 69 Noes and 3 Present. On May 13, 2009 the Missouri Senate unanimously passed HB 361, 43 Ayes 0 Noes. Missouri Governor Jay Nixon signed this bill into law on July 13, 2009.
en.wikipedia.org...
Fifteen States Have Passed Anti-REAL ID Legislation. As the deadline for compliance draws closer, more states are opting out of the controversial REAL ID national identification system. The states that have passed anti-REAL ID legislation are: Arkansas (pdf), Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Maine, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Carolina, and Washington. The resistance to REAL ID is growing. In May, more than 60 organizations and 215 blogs joined a campaign to submit comments against REAL ID. There are bills in both the U.S. House and Senate that would repeal the national identification scheme. EPIC and 24 experts in privacy and technology submitted detailed comments (pdf) explaining the many privacy and security threats raised by the REAL ID Act. For more information, see EPIC's Spotlight on Surveillance for March. (June 5, 2007)
epic.org...
Originally posted by bekod
It could be taken as to mean "in hand or forehead" as you hold a card in your hand, you know your pin number in your head, simple as that. no implant no chip needed just the good old card and number.
Originally posted by Golf66
Missouri is not on board with the National ID bovine excrement and never will be.
On April 16, 2009 the Missouri House of Representatives passed the anti REAL ID bill HB 361 to repeal section 302.171, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof two new sections relating to noncompliance with the federal REAL ID Act of 2005 sponsored by Representative Jim Guest by a vote of 83 Ayes 69 Noes and 3 Present. On May 13, 2009 the Missouri Senate unanimously passed HB 361, 43 Ayes 0 Noes. Missouri Governor Jay Nixon signed this bill into law on July 13, 2009.
en.wikipedia.org...
For example, Oklahoma has passed a law stating:
Oklahoma – OKLA. STAT. ANN, tit. 47, § 6-110.3 (2007) (The State of Oklahoma shall not participate in the implementation of the REAL ID Act of 2005. The Department of Public Safety is hereby directed not to implement the provisions of the REAL ID Act of 2005 and to report to the Governor and the Legislature any attempt by agencies or agents of the United States Department of Homeland Security to secure the implementation of the REAL ID Act of 2005 through the operations of that or any other state department.
Yet, secretly, Oklahoma has complied with the Real ID act by changing “department policy” in its state DMV offices...
How close is Oklahoma to the Real ID, Much, Much, Closer then it should be
At least 13 (the National Conference of State Legislatures recognizes 16) states passed an actual law against Real ID but we know from Congressional documents that some of these states are quietly issuing Real ID compliant driver’s licenses anyways.
Thirteen states have laws prohibiting compliance with the REAL ID Act. Even so, DHS believes that some of these states already issue secure identification documents consistent with the standards of the regulation.
These states may not sign up for the gold star just yet, but with a wink and a nod, they are just as surely undermining the will of the people by meeting the first 18 benchmarks of Real ID. To state it simply, these states are positioned to do the bidding of the Department of Homeland Security by meeting the requirements of the Real ID Act while retaining plausible deniability about violating their states’ law that prohibits implementation of the Real ID Act.
She is suing the state for its refusal to accommodate her religious beliefs, protected under the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act.
She is also suing the state for violating her right to keep her personal and unique biometric measurements and identification private, per Article II, Section 30 of the Oklahoma Constitution, which is VERY similar to the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment.
www.cis.org...
States like Missouri and Montana have outright bans on REAL ID compliance, but even these states are improving standards. Oregon will not permit its motor vehicle agency to share data with other states. Other states, like New Hampshire, cannot spend money on REAL ID compliance without prior approval.
Originally posted by bekod
reply to post by defcon5
true , take a look at their interpenetration of locusts, in the book of rev, does that not in today's world, seem as if they are describing a helo an ah64?, or is it a real bug? me ill take it they are trying to describe an AH64, or other type of air craft, same with their way of describing tanks, it is all how one sees it, you might be right i might be right and thus is the problem , not every one can be right , or can they?
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by bekod
reply to post by defcon5
true , take a look at their interpenetration of locusts, in the book of rev, does that not in today's world, seem as if they are describing a helo an ah64?, or is it a real bug? me ill take it they are trying to describe an AH64, or other type of air craft, same with their way of describing tanks, it is all how one sees it, you might be right i might be right and thus is the problem , not every one can be right , or can they?
There are many things that can be translated many different ways using hindsight and knowing how the world is now. For the “Mark”, you must realize that Christianity is still one of (if not the) largest group on the plant, and NONE of them are going to accept any ID that goes under the skin because of the common translation of that verse. Yet we know that not only will it be implemented, but a lot of Christians will be fooled into getting it. That's why I am stating that they will keep “threatening” a “Chip”, but have quietly released a “card” that meets all the criteria.
Make a list of the Criteria that the mark mentions and see how the Real ID Stacks up:
1) Its world wide. (so far I've only found one country that does not issue them yet)
2) It in some way involves your head (facial recognition) or hands (fingerprints).
3) You cannot effectively live without one (prevents you from getting employment, opening a bank account, getting prescription meds, traveling any significant distance, making a large withdraw from a bank, driving to a job, etc...)
4) It is the “Number of a Man”, unique digitized biometric measurements.
5) It is issued by the final “beast” world superpower that came into existence after Rome.
6) It is one short (666) of some mark between god and his people (777):
7) Even DHS refers to it as a “Mark” in their benchmark compliance listing.
8) You surrender your freedom to your government in trade for a promise of their protection, protection that you are to look to God for as a Christian. Therefore it means that you trust your government more then you trust your God, and makes your government a god in the eyes of God.
edit on 2/24/2013 by defcon5 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 2ndthought
You've brought a new light to the subject for me, Defcon. I can only see one thing wrong with your assertions. IF it comes down to it, IF I were prepared to go to ground, I could easily lose a card, thereby being lost from prying eyes.
Much harder to do with an implanted chip. And if that chip does become a reality, I WILL be going to ground. Can only hope and pray I'm not the only one, and that a network can be set up by 'us' to help each other survive.