posted on Feb, 21 2013 @ 11:57 AM
Crazy thought.
Almost all animals solve their disputes without getting into total destruction mode. They will cause harm for sure... and in extreme circumstances do
actually kill. But most disputes seem to be solved like this.
What if they are able to "sense" out who would actually win to the death in all probable scenarios via the way they express their aggression here.
That way they can reduce any unnecessary physical harm while still "knowing who's boss". These sort of tense showdowns would only happen between
relatively similar strengths because obviously overbalanced ones would be resolved on first sight.
We however, with most people lacking a truly strong intuitive sense... have to actually *do* it all the way to the end. Or at least we're led to
believe so.
Dunno if that comes out clear... but it was interesting to see that they really seemed to need to figure out who was the true strength, but didn't
want to cause each other any actual harm.
edit on 21-2-2013 by ErgoTheConclusion because: (no reason given)