posted on Feb, 21 2013 @ 07:15 AM
With so much arguable drama getting thrown around , from vaccines to chem-trails. There are some good points to both sides of almost all of them. But
, should we be upset with just the matter at hand that's being argued? I'm not so sure , so far from what I can tell both sides of any of the
arguments seem to be fairing pretty badly. I think if we asked our self's why there is an increasing limit to our right to information , and our
right to choice. Then we all have a common ground that would cover a lot of topics thus all working together to hold people in our government
responsible for their negligence and corrupt behavior rather than fighting and arguing with each other giving the government just that much more
leverage and ammo. I think if we start asking the direct questions of What Options for Information and What Options of Choice are being limited and
Why they are being limited. We would have a better suited common anger directive for the public to act united on. Just a rambling half thought after
not really being able to sleep all night but I'm always trying to think of ways to help and figured if every ones going to be pissed about some thing
then they might as well be pissed together and still accomplish what they desired in the first place. Good nighorning y'all. Thanks for listening ,
take care.